Literature DB >> 19171891

Generalized ensemble methods for de novo structure prediction.

Alena Shmygelska1, Michael Levitt.   

Abstract

Current methods for predicting protein structure depend on two interrelated components: (i) an energy function that should have a low value near the correct structure and (ii) a method for searching through different conformations of the polypeptide chain. Identification of the most efficient search methods is essential if we are to be able to apply such methods broadly and with confidence. In addition, efficient search methods provide a rigorous test of existing energy functions, which are generally knowledge-based and contain different terms added together with arbitrary weights. Here, we test different search methods with one of the most accurate and predictive energy functions, namely Rosetta the knowledge-based force-field from Baker's group [Simons K, Kooperberg C, Huang E, Baker D (1997) J Mol Biol 268:209-225]. We use an implementation of a generalized ensemble search method to scale relevant parts of the energy function. This method, known as Hamiltonian Replica Exchange Monte Carlo, outperforms the original Monte Carlo Simulated Annealing used in the Rosetta package in terms of sampling low-energy states. It also outperforms another widely used generalized ensemble search method known as Temperature Replica Exchange Monte Carlo. Our results reveal clear deficiencies in the low-resolution Rosetta energy function in that the lowest energy structures are not necessarily the most native-like. By using a set of nonnative low-energy structures found by our extensive sampling, we discovered that the long-range and short-range backbone hydrogen-bonding energy terms of the Rosetta energy discriminate between the nonnative and native-like structures significantly better than the low-resolution score used in Rosetta.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19171891      PMCID: PMC2631076          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0812510106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  22 in total

1.  Local energy landscape flattening: parallel hyperbolic Monte Carlo sampling of protein folding.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Daisuke Kihara; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2002-08-01

2.  Replica Monte Carlo simulation of spin glasses.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1986-11-24       Impact factor: 9.161

Review 3.  Progress in modeling of protein structures and interactions.

Authors:  Ora Schueler-Furman; Chu Wang; Phil Bradley; Kira Misura; David Baker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-10-28       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  TASSER: an automated method for the prediction of protein tertiary structures in CASP6.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Adrian K Arakaki; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2005

5.  Toward high-resolution de novo structure prediction for small proteins.

Authors:  Philip Bradley; Kira M S Misura; David Baker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Macromolecular modeling with rosetta.

Authors:  Rhiju Das; David Baker
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 23.643

7.  Clustering of low-energy conformations near the native structures of small proteins.

Authors:  D Shortle; K T Simons; D Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-09-15       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Using a hydrophobic contact potential to evaluate native and near-native folds generated by molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  E S Huang; S Subbiah; J Tsai; M Levitt
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1996-04-05       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Assembly of protein tertiary structures from fragments with similar local sequences using simulated annealing and Bayesian scoring functions.

Authors:  K T Simons; C Kooperberg; E Huang; D Baker
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1997-04-25       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Close agreement between the orientation dependence of hydrogen bonds observed in protein structures and quantum mechanical calculations.

Authors:  Alexandre V Morozov; Tanja Kortemme; Kiril Tsemekhman; David Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-04-26       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  From laptop to benchtop to bedside: structure-based drug design on protein targets.

Authors:  Lu Chen; John K Morrow; Hoang T Tran; Sharangdhar S Phatak; Lei Du-Cuny; Shuxing Zhang
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.116

2.  Replica exchanging self-guided Langevin dynamics for efficient and accurate conformational sampling.

Authors:  Xiongwu Wu; Milan Hodoscek; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  When the lowest energy does not induce native structures: parallel minimization of multi-energy values by hybridizing searching intelligences.

Authors:  Qiang Lü; Xiao-Yan Xia; Rong Chen; Da-Jun Miao; Sha-Sha Chen; Li-Jun Quan; Hai-Ou Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Multiscale coarse-graining of the protein energy landscape.

Authors:  Ronald D Hills; Lanyuan Lu; Gregory A Voth
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  Sequence motifs in MADS transcription factors responsible for specificity and diversification of protein-protein interaction.

Authors:  Aalt D J van Dijk; Giuseppa Morabito; Martijn Fiers; Roeland C H J van Ham; Gerco C Angenent; Richard G H Immink
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  The dual role of fragments in fragment-assembly methods for de novo protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Julia Handl; Joshua Knowles; Robert Vernon; David Baker; Simon C Lovell
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-11-17

7.  A probabilistic fragment-based protein structure prediction algorithm.

Authors:  David Simoncini; Francois Berenger; Rojan Shrestha; Kam Y J Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Potentials of mean force for protein structure prediction vindicated, formalized and generalized.

Authors:  Thomas Hamelryck; Mikael Borg; Martin Paluszewski; Jonas Paulsen; Jes Frellsen; Christian Andreetta; Wouter Boomsma; Sandro Bottaro; Jesper Ferkinghoff-Borg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A population-based evolutionary search approach to the multiple minima problem in de novo protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Sameh Saleh; Brian Olson; Amarda Shehu
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2013-11-08

10.  The roles of entropy and kinetics in structure prediction.

Authors:  Gregory R Bowman; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.