Literature DB >> 18550801

CpG dinucleotides and the mutation rate of non-CpG DNA.

Jean-Claude Walser1, Loïc Ponger, Anthony V Furano.   

Abstract

The neutral mutation rate is equal to the base substitution rate when the latter is not affected by natural selection. Differences between these rates may reveal that factors such as natural selection, linkage, or a mutator locus are affecting a given sequence. We examined the neutral base substitution rate by measuring the sequence divergence of approximately 30,000 pairs of inactive orthologous L1 retrotransposon sequences interspersed throughout the human and chimpanzee genomes. In contrast to other studies, we related ortholog divergence to the time (age) that the L1 sequences resided in the genome prior to the chimpanzee and human speciation. As expected, the younger orthologs contained more hypermutable CpGs than the older ones because of their conversion to TpGs (and CpAs). Consequently, the younger orthologs accumulated more CpG mutations than the older ones during the approximately 5 million years since the human and chimpanzee lineages separated. But during this same time, the younger orthologs also accumulated more non-CpG mutations than the older ones. In fact, non-CpG and CpG mutations showed an almost perfect (R2 = 0.98) correlation for approximately 97% of the ortholog pairs. The correlation is independent of G + C content, recombination rate, and chromosomal location. Therefore, it likely reflects an intrinsic effect of CpGs, or mutations thereof, on non-CpG DNA rather than the joint manifestation of the chromosomal environment. The CpG effect is not uniform for all regions of non-CpG DNA. Therefore, the mutation rate of non-CpG DNA is contingent to varying extents on local CpG content. Aside from their implications for mutational mechanisms, these results indicate that a precise determination of a uniform genome-wide neutral mutation rate may not be attainable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18550801      PMCID: PMC2527700          DOI: 10.1101/gr.076455.108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  70 in total

Review 1.  L1 (LINE-1) retrotransposon diversity differs dramatically between mammals and fish.

Authors:  Anthony V Furano; David D Duvernell; Stephane Boissinot
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 2.  Mobile elements: drivers of genome evolution.

Authors:  Haig H Kazazian
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-03-12       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Error-prone DNA polymerases: when making a mistake is the only way to get ahead.

Authors:  Alison J Rattray; Jeffrey N Strathern
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 16.830

4.  GC content evolution of the human and mouse genomes: insights from the study of processed pseudogenes in regions of different recombination rates.

Authors:  Adel Khelifi; Julien Meunier; Laurent Duret; Dominique Mouchiroud
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 5.  Characteristics, causes and evolutionary consequences of male-biased mutation.

Authors:  Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Strong and weak male mutation bias at different sites in the primate genomes: insights from the human-chimpanzee comparison.

Authors:  James Taylor; Svitlana Tyekucheva; Michael Zody; Francesca Chiaromonte; Kateryna D Makova
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Genetic evidence for complex speciation of humans and chimpanzees.

Authors:  Nick Patterson; Daniel J Richter; Sante Gnerre; Eric S Lander; David Reich
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-05-17       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Recently mobilized transposons in the human and chimpanzee genomes.

Authors:  Ryan E Mills; E Andrew Bennett; Rebecca C Iskow; Christopher T Luttig; Circe Tsui; W Stephen Pittard; Scott E Devine
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-02-02       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Evolutionary discrimination of mammalian conserved non-genic sequences (CNGs).

Authors:  Emmanouil T Dermitzakis; Alexandre Reymond; Nathalie Scamuffa; Catherine Ucla; Ewen Kirkness; Colette Rossier; Stylianos E Antonarakis
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-10-02       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 10.  Cytosine methylation and DNA repair.

Authors:  C P Walsh; G L Xu
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.291

View more
  35 in total

Review 1.  Variation in the mutation rate across mammalian genomes.

Authors:  Alan Hodgkinson; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  The mutational spectrum of non-CpG DNA varies with CpG content.

Authors:  Jean-Claude Walser; Anthony V Furano
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Point mutation instability (PIN) mutator phenotype as model for true back mutations seen in hereditary tyrosinemia type 1 - a hypothesis.

Authors:  Etresia van Dyk; Pieter J Pretorius
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 4.982

4.  Segmenting the human genome based on states of neutral genetic divergence.

Authors:  Prabhani Kuruppumullage Don; Guruprasad Ananda; Francesca Chiaromonte; Kateryna D Makova
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  DNA Demethylation Dynamics in the Human Prenatal Germline.

Authors:  Sofia Gkountela; Kelvin X Zhang; Tiasha A Shafiq; Wen-Wei Liao; Joseph Hargan-Calvopiña; Pao-Yang Chen; Amander T Clark
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  The (r)evolution of SINE versus LINE distributions in primate genomes: sex chromosomes are important.

Authors:  Erika M Kvikstad; Kateryna D Makova
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 7.  On the sequence-directed nature of human gene mutation: the role of genomic architecture and the local DNA sequence environment in mediating gene mutations underlying human inherited disease.

Authors:  David N Cooper; Albino Bacolla; Claude Férec; Karen M Vasquez; Hildegard Kehrer-Sawatzki; Jian-Min Chen
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 4.878

8.  Characteristics of the CArG-SRF binding context in mammalian genomes.

Authors:  Wenwu Wu; Xia Shen; Shiheng Tao
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 2.957

9.  The impact of CpG island on defining transcriptional activation of the mouse L1 retrotransposable elements.

Authors:  Sung-Hun Lee; Soo-Young Cho; M Frances Shannon; Jun Fan; Danny Rangasamy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Integrated genetic and epigenetic analysis identifies haplotype-specific methylation in the FTO type 2 diabetes and obesity susceptibility locus.

Authors:  Christopher G Bell; Sarah Finer; Cecilia M Lindgren; Gareth A Wilson; Vardhman K Rakyan; Andrew E Teschendorff; Pelin Akan; Elia Stupka; Thomas A Down; Inga Prokopenko; Ian M Morison; Jonathan Mill; Ruth Pidsley; Panos Deloukas; Timothy M Frayling; Andrew T Hattersley; Mark I McCarthy; Stephan Beck; Graham A Hitman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.