Literature DB >> 16280537

Strong and weak male mutation bias at different sites in the primate genomes: insights from the human-chimpanzee comparison.

James Taylor1, Svitlana Tyekucheva, Michael Zody, Francesca Chiaromonte, Kateryna D Makova.   

Abstract

Male mutation bias is a higher mutation rate in males than in females thought to result from the greater number of germ line cell divisions in males. If errors in DNA replication cause most mutations, then the magnitude of male mutation bias, measured as the male-to-female mutation rate ratio (alpha), should reflect the relative excess of male versus female germ line cell divisions. Evolutionary rates averaged among all sites in a sequence and compared between mammalian sex chromosomes were shown to be indeed higher in males than in females. However, it is presently unknown whether individual classes of substitutions exhibit such bias. To address this issue, we investigated male mutation bias separately at non-CpG and CpG sites using human-chimpanzee whole-genome alignments. We observed strong male mutation bias at non-CpG sites: alpha in the X-autosome comparison was approximately 6-7, which was similar to the male-to-female ratio in the number of germ line cell divisions. In contrast, mutations at CpG sites exhibited weak male mutation bias: alpha in the X-autosome comparison was only approximately 2-3. This is consistent with the methylation-induced and replication-independent mechanism of CpG transitions, which constitute the majority of mutations at CpG sites. Interestingly, our study also indicated weak male mutation bias for transversions at CpG sites, implying a spontaneous mechanism largely not associated with replication. Male mutation bias was equally strong at CpG and non-CpG sites located within unmethylated "CpG islands," suggesting the replication-dependent origin of these mutations. Thus, we found that the strength of male mutation bias is nonuniform in the primate genomes. Importantly, we discovered that male mutation bias depends on the proportion of CpG sites in the loci compared. This might explain the differences in the magnitude of primate male mutation bias observed among studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16280537     DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msj060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  44 in total

Review 1.  Variation in the mutation rate across mammalian genomes.

Authors:  Alan Hodgkinson; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Mutation biases and mutation rate variation around very short human microsatellites revealed by human-chimpanzee-orangutan genomic sequence alignments.

Authors:  William Amos
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  The mutational spectrum of non-CpG DNA varies with CpG content.

Authors:  Jean-Claude Walser; Anthony V Furano
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 4.  Genome analyses substantiate male mutation bias in many species.

Authors:  Melissa A Wilson Sayres; Kateryna D Makova
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 4.345

Review 5.  Characteristics, causes and evolutionary consequences of male-biased mutation.

Authors:  Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Sperm competition can drive a male-biased mutation rate.

Authors:  Justin P Blumenstiel
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 2.691

7.  A GATA-1-regulated microRNA locus essential for erythropoiesis.

Authors:  Louis C Dore; Julio D Amigo; Camila O Dos Santos; Zhe Zhang; Xiaowu Gai; John W Tobias; Duonan Yu; Alyssa M Klein; Christine Dorman; Weisheng Wu; Ross C Hardison; Barry H Paw; Mitchell J Weiss
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  CpG dinucleotides and the mutation rate of non-CpG DNA.

Authors:  Jean-Claude Walser; Loïc Ponger; Anthony V Furano
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Evidence that replication-associated mutation alone does not explain between-chromosome differences in substitution rates.

Authors:  Catherine J Pink; Siva K Swaminathan; Ian Dunham; Jane Rogers; Andrew Ward; Laurence D Hurst
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 3.416

10.  Activating mutations in FGFR3 and HRAS reveal a shared genetic origin for congenital disorders and testicular tumors.

Authors:  Anne Goriely; Ruth M S Hansen; Indira B Taylor; Inge A Olesen; Grete Krag Jacobsen; Simon J McGowan; Susanne P Pfeifer; Gilean A T McVean; Ewa Rajpert-De Meyts; Andrew O M Wilkie
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2009-10-25       Impact factor: 38.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.