Literature DB >> 14526086

Evolutionary discrimination of mammalian conserved non-genic sequences (CNGs).

Emmanouil T Dermitzakis1, Alexandre Reymond, Nathalie Scamuffa, Catherine Ucla, Ewen Kirkness, Colette Rossier, Stylianos E Antonarakis.   

Abstract

Analysis of the human and mouse genomes identified an abundance of conserved non-genic sequences (CNGs). The significance and evolutionary depth of their conservation remain unanswered. We have quantified levels and patterns of conservation of 191 CNGs of human chromosome 21 in 14 mammalian species. We found that CNGs are significantly more conserved than protein-coding genes and noncoding RNAS (ncRNAs) within the mammalian class from primates to monotremes to marsupials. The pattern of substitutions in CNGs differed from that seen in protein-coding and ncRNA genes and resembled that of protein-binding regions. About 0.3% to 1% of the human genome corresponds to a previously unknown class of extremely constrained CNGs shared among mammals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14526086     DOI: 10.1126/science.1087047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  62 in total

1.  Haldane and the first estimates of the human mutation rate.

Authors:  Michael W Nachman
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.166

Review 2.  Plant genome size research: a field in focus.

Authors:  M D Bennett; I J Leitch
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 3.  Genomes, phylogeny, and evolutionary systems biology.

Authors:  Mónica Medina
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-04-25       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Evolutionary constraints in conserved nongenic sequences of mammals.

Authors:  Peter D Keightley; Gregory V Kryukov; Shamil Sunyaev; Daniel L Halligan; Daniel J Gaffney
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Subtree power analysis and species selection for comparative genomics.

Authors:  Jon D McAuliffe; Michael I Jordan; Lior Pachter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-05-23       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Phylogenetics of modern birds in the era of genomics.

Authors:  Scott V Edwards; W Bryan Jennings; Andrew M Shedlock
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Distribution and intensity of constraint in mammalian genomic sequence.

Authors:  Gregory M Cooper; Eric A Stone; George Asimenos; Eric D Green; Serafim Batzoglou; Arend Sidow
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-06-17       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Deletions involving long-range conserved nongenic sequences upstream and downstream of FOXL2 as a novel disease-causing mechanism in blepharophimosis syndrome.

Authors:  D Beysen; J Raes; B P Leroy; A Lucassen; J R W Yates; J Clayton-Smith; H Ilyina; S Sklower Brooks; S Christin-Maitre; M Fellous; J P Fryns; J R Kim; P Lapunzina; E Lemyre; F Meire; L M Messiaen; C Oley; M Splitt; J Thomson; Y Van de Peer; R A Veitia; A De Paepe; E De Baere
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2005-06-16       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Population genomics of human gene expression.

Authors:  Barbara E Stranger; Alexandra C Nica; Matthew S Forrest; Antigone Dimas; Christine P Bird; Claude Beazley; Catherine E Ingle; Mark Dunning; Paul Flicek; Daphne Koller; Stephen Montgomery; Simon Tavaré; Panos Deloukas; Emmanouil T Dermitzakis
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2007-09-16       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Comparison of human chromosome 21 conserved nongenic sequences (CNGs) with the mouse and dog genomes shows that their selective constraint is independent of their genic environment.

Authors:  Emmanouil T Dermitzakis; Ewen Kirkness; Scott Schwarz; Ewan Birney; Alexandre Reymond; Stylianos E Antonarakis
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-04-12       Impact factor: 9.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.