Literature DB >> 15599666

Effect of yeast inoculation rate on the metabolism of contaminating lactobacilli during fermentation of corn mash.

Neelakantam V Narendranath1, Ronan Power.   

Abstract

Two separate 4 (bacterial concentrations)x6 (yeast concentrations) full factorial experiments were conducted in an attempt to identify a novel approach to minimize the effects caused by bacterial contamination during industrial production of ethanol from corn. Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus paracasei, commonly occurring bacterial contaminants in ethanol plants, were used in separate fermentation experiments conducted in duplicate using an industrial strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Allyeast Superstart. Bacterial concentrations were 0, 1x10(6), 1x10(7) and 1x10(8) cells/ml mash. Yeast concentrations were 0, 1x10(6), 1x10(7), 2x10(7), 3x10(7), and 4x10(7) cells/ml mash. An increased yeast inoculation rate of 3x10(7) cells/ml resulted in a greater than 80% decrease (P < 0.001) and a greater than 55% decrease (P < 0.001) in lactic acid production by L. plantarum and L. paracasei, respectively, when mash was infected with 1x10(8) lactobacilli/ml. No differences (P > 0.25) were observed in the final ethanol concentration produced by yeast at any of the inoculation rates studied, in the absence of lactobacilli. However, when the mash was infected with 1x10(7) or 1x10(8) lactobacilli/ml, a reduction of 0.7-0.9% v/v (P < 0.005) and a reduction of 0.4-0.6% v/v (P < 0.005) in the final ethanol produced was observed in mashes inoculated with 1x10(6) and 1x10(7) yeast cells/ml, respectively. At higher yeast inoculation rates of 3x10(7) or 4x10(7) cells/ml, no differences (P > 0.35) were observed in the final ethanol produced even when the mash was infected with 1x10(8) lactobacilli/ml. The increase in ethanol corresponded to the reduction in lactic acid production by lactobacilli. This suggests that using an inoculation rate of 3x10(7) yeast cells/ml reduces the growth and metabolism of contaminating lactic bacteria significantly, which results in reduced lactic acid production and a concomitant increase in ethanol production by yeast.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15599666     DOI: 10.1007/s10295-004-0191-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 1367-5435            Impact factor:   3.346


  6 in total

1.  Penicillin and tetracycline as contamination control agents in alcoholic fermentation of sugar cane molasses.

Authors:  E AQUARONE
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1960-09

2.  Use of virginiamycin to control the growth of lactic acid bacteria during alcohol fermentation.

Authors:  S H Hynes; D M Kjarsgaard; K C Thomas; W M Ingledew
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.346

3.  Agricultural use of antibiotics and the evolution and transfer of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

Authors:  G G Khachatourians
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-11-03       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Effects of lactobacilli on yeast-catalyzed ethanol fermentations.

Authors:  N V Narendranath; S H Hynes; K C Thomas; W M Ingledew
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  By-product inhibition effects on ethanolic fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  B Maiorella; H W Blanch; C R Wilke
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Screening for yeast with antibacterial properties from an ethanol distillery.

Authors:  Pedro de Oliva Neto; Mirella Amorim Ferreira; Fumio Yokoya
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 9.642

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Simultaneous saccharification and cofermentation of lignocellulosic residues from commercial furfural production and corn kernels using different nutrient media.

Authors:  Yong Tang; Danqing Zhao; Carrasco Cristhian; Jianxin Jiang
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2011-07-31       Impact factor: 6.040

2.  Chlorine dioxide against bacteria and yeasts from the alcoholic fermentation.

Authors:  Silvana Perissatto Meneghin; Fabricia Cristina Reis; Paulo Garcia de Almeida; Sandra Regina Ceccato-Antonini
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2008-06-01       Impact factor: 2.476

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.