Literature DB >> 18243459

Paradoxical cross-over due to attention to high or low spatial frequencies.

Matthias Niemeier1, Boge Stojanoski, Vaughan W A Singh, Eddie Chu.   

Abstract

The mechanisms underlying the right hemisphere's dominance for spatial and attentional functions lacks a comprehensively explanation. For example, perceptual biases, as observed in line bisection and related tasks, might be caused by an attentional asymmetry or by perceptual processes such as a specialization of the left and right hemisphere for high and low spatial frequencies (SFs), respectively. Here we used the gratingscales task to measure perceptual bias in SF judgements, and we cued participants' attention either to high or low SFs. Participants showed a leftward bias when comparing the high SF components of the stimulus, and a rightward bias when comparing the low SF components-opposite to what would be expected from a hemispheric lateralization for SFs. Two control experiments used different strategies to manipulate the width of the attentional window. However, we observed no influence on perceptual bias, thus ruling out the possibility that the results in Experiment 1 were due to differences in attentional window size. These data support the idea of an attentional asymmetry underlying perceptual bias. Our results provide novel support for the role of attentional asymmetry in perceptual biases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18243459     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2007.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  8 in total

1.  The perceptual consequences of the attentional bias: evidence for distractor removal.

Authors:  Matthias Niemeier; Vaughan V W Singh; Matthew Keough; Nadine Akbar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-06-07       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Distractor removal amplifies spatial frequency-specific crossover of the attentional bias: a psychophysical and Monte Carlo simulation study.

Authors:  Jiaqing Chen; Matthias Niemeier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Intra- and Inter-Task Reliability of Spatial Attention Measures in Pseudoneglect.

Authors:  Gemma Learmonth; Aodhan Gallagher; Jamie Gibson; Gregor Thut; Monika Harvey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Behavioural asymmetries on the greyscales task: The influence of native reading direction.

Authors:  Trista E Friedrich; Lorin J Elias
Journal:  Cult Brain       Date:  2014-10-12

5.  Evidence for a common mechanism of spatial attention and visual awareness: Towards construct validity of pseudoneglect.

Authors:  Jiaqing Chen; Jagjot Kaur; Hana Abbas; Ming Wu; Wenyi Luo; Sinan Osman; Matthias Niemeier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Detection of spatial frequency in brain-damaged patients: influence of hemispheric asymmetries and hemineglect.

Authors:  Natanael A Dos Santos; Suellen M Andrade; Bernardino Fernandez Calvo
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Differential auditory-oculomotor interactions in patients with right vs. left sided subjective tinnitus: a saccade study.

Authors:  Alexandre Lang; Marine Vernet; Qing Yang; Christophe Orssaud; Alain Londero; Zoï Kapoula
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Upper nasal hemifield location and nonspatial auditory tones accelerate visual detection during dichoptic viewing.

Authors:  Terhi Mustonen; Mikko Nuutinen; Lari Vainio; Jukka Häkkinen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.