Literature DB >> 10204546

Attention activates winner-take-all competition among visual filters.

D K Lee1, L Itti, C Koch, J Braun.   

Abstract

Shifting attention away from a visual stimulus reduces, but does not abolish, visual discrimination performance. This residual vision with 'poor' attention can be compared to normal vision with 'full' attention to reveal how attention alters visual perception. We report large differences between residual and normal visual thresholds for discriminating the orientation or spatial frequency of simple patterns, and smaller differences for discriminating contrast. A computational model, in which attention activates a winner-take-all competition among overlapping visual filters, quantitatively accounts for all observations. Our model predicts that the effects of attention on visual cortical neurons include increased contrast gain as well as sharper tuning to orientation and spatial frequency.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10204546     DOI: 10.1038/7286

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Neurosci        ISSN: 1097-6256            Impact factor:   24.884


  101 in total

1.  Spatial covert attention increases contrast sensitivity across the CSF: support for signal enhancement.

Authors:  M Carrasco; C Penpeci-Talgar; M Eckstein
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Vertical meridian asymmetry in spatial resolution: visual and attentional factors.

Authors:  Cigdem P Talgar; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

3.  Perceptual learning improves contrast sensitivity of V1 neurons in cats.

Authors:  Tianmiao Hua; Pinglei Bao; Chang-Bing Huang; Zhenhua Wang; Jinwang Xu; Yifeng Zhou; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Attention alters appearance.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco; Sam Ling; Sarah Read
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Reciprocal inhibition of inhibition: a circuit motif for flexible categorization in stimulus selection.

Authors:  Shreesh P Mysore; Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Dissociable prior influences of signal probability and relevance on visual contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  Valentin Wyart; Anna Christina Nobre; Christopher Summerfield
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  How the speed of motor-response decisions, but not focal-attentional selection, differs as a function of task set and target prevalence.

Authors:  Thomas Töllner; Dragan Rangelov; Hermann J Müller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Opposing effects of attention and consciousness on afterimages.

Authors:  Jeroen J A van Boxtel; Naotsugu Tsuchiya; Christof Koch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Recurrent antitopographic inhibition mediates competitive stimulus selection in an attention network.

Authors:  Dihui Lai; Sebastian Brandt; Harald Luksch; Ralf Wessel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Stimulus competition mediates the joint effects of spatial and feature-based attention.

Authors:  Alex L White; Martin Rolfs; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.