Literature DB >> 18534526

Long-term results of anti-protrusion cage and massive allografts for the management of periprosthetic acetabular bone loss.

Dario Regis1, Bruno Magnan, Andrea Sandri, Pietro Bartolozzi.   

Abstract

From 1992 to 1995, 71 total hip arthroplasties with extensive acetabular bone loss underwent revision using bulk allografts and Burch-Schneider anti-protrusion cages. Twelve patients died of unrelated causes and 3 were lost to follow-up. Fifty-six hips were available for clinical and radiographic follow-up examination at an average of 11.7 years after surgery. The average final Harris hip score was 75. X-ray signs of incorporation of massive bone graft were observed in 49 hips. Two cases developed deep infection that required resection arthroplasty. Aseptic loosening of the acetabular cage occurred in 5 patients, and 2 of them underwent re-revision. With a total survival rate of 87.5%, anti-protrusion cages and structural allografts compare favorably with other techniques in the long-term reconstructive treatment of extensive loss of acetabular bone stock.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18534526     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.06.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  22 in total

1.  Large acetabular defects can be managed with cementless revision components.

Authors:  E Scott Paxton; James A Keeney; William J Maloney; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  [Mega cups and partial pelvic replacement].

Authors:  R von Eisenhart-Rothe; H Gollwitzer; A Toepfer; H Pilge; B M Holzapfel; H Rechl; R Gradinger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  [Treatment of acetabular defects with the trabecular metal revision system].

Authors:  G I Wassilew; V Janz; C Perka; M Müller
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Late fracture of a Burch-Schneider acetabular cage: rare occurrence following polyethylene cup wear.

Authors:  Dario Regis; Andrea Sandri; Alessandra Rizzo; Pietro Bartolozzi
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2009-03-26

5.  [Treatment of acetabular bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty using the Revisio-System].

Authors:  M Hoberg; B M Holzapfel; A F Steinert; F Kratzer; M Walcher; M Rudert
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  [Standardized reconstruction of acetabular bone defects using the cranial socket system].

Authors:  Maximilian Rudert; Boris Michael Holzapfel; Florian Kratzer; Reiner Gradinger
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.154

Review 7.  Clinical evaluation and surgical options in acetabular reconstruction: A literature review.

Authors:  Asim Qamar Ahmad; Ran Schwarzkopf
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2015-11-02

8.  The use of customized cages in revision total hip arthroplasty for Paprosky type III acetabular bone defects.

Authors:  Yuanqing Mao; Chen Xu; Jiawei Xu; Huiwu Li; Fengxiang Liu; Degang Yu; Zhenan Zhu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  The Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage: medium follow-up results.

Authors:  J Lamo-Espinosa; J Duart Clemente; P Díaz-Rada; J Pons-Villanueva; J R Valentí-Nín
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2012-12-20

10.  Reconstructing Pelvic Discontinuity and Severe Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision Hip Arthroplasty with a Massive Allograft and Cage.

Authors:  Stephen R Rossman; Edward Y Cheng
Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech       Date:  2016-08-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.