Literature DB >> 30233923

Reconstructing Pelvic Discontinuity and Severe Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision Hip Arthroplasty with a Massive Allograft and Cage.

Stephen R Rossman1, Edward Y Cheng1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The use of a massive allograft along with an antiprotrusio cage for the treatment of large periprosthetic acetabular defects can restore structural integrity to the pelvis and provide durable revision-free survival. STEP 1 EXPOSE THE ACETABULUM VIDEO 1 AND FIGS 1-A AND 1-B: Perform an extensile approach to the acetabulum. STEP 2 REMOVE THE EXISTING ACETABULAR COMPONENT VIDEO 1 AND FIGS 2-A AND 2-B: Ensure that the appropriate tools are available for removal of the existing acetabular component. STEP 3 PREPARE THE ACETABULUM FIG 3: It is important to remove fibrous tissue around the acetabulum to get to healthy bleeding bone. STEP 4 PREPARE THE BULK ALLOGRAFT VIDEO 2 AND FIGS 4-A 4-B AND 4-C: It is important to remove all of the native cartilage from the graft to allow for osseous ingrowth potential. STEP 5 PLACE THE BULK ALLOGRAFT INTO THE ACETABULAR DEFECT AND FILL EXCESS SPACE WITH ALLOGRAFT CHIPS: Ensure that the graft properly fits within the acetabular defect. STEP 6 SECURE THE GRAFT TO THE ACETABULUM AND REAM THE ALLOGRAFT: It is important to stabilize the bulk allograft to the pelvis before reaming. STEP 7 IMPLANT THE CAGE VIDEO 4 AND FIGS 9-A 9-B AND 9-C: Impact the cage implant into position and secure it to the pelvis with as many screws as necessary to obtain a secure implant. STEP 8 CEMENT THE POLYETHYLENE CUP AND PERFORM TRIAL REDUCTION OF THE HIP: Cement the polyethylene cup in the proper orientation and reduce the hip.
RESULTS: We reviewed 72 cage constructs in 68 patients at a mean follow-up of 5.1 years (range, 1.2 to 10.7 years)3.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 30233923      PMCID: PMC6135617          DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.16.00026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech        ISSN: 2160-2204


  3 in total

1.  Acetabular cage survival and analysis of factors related to failure.

Authors:  Jonathan N Sembrano; Edward Y Cheng
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Long-term results of anti-protrusion cage and massive allografts for the management of periprosthetic acetabular bone loss.

Authors:  Dario Regis; Bruno Magnan; Andrea Sandri; Pietro Bartolozzi
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  The direct lateral approach to the hip.

Authors:  K Hardinge
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1982
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.