Literature DB >> 8333170

Different motion sensitive units are involved in recovering the direction of moving lines.

J Lorenceau1, M Shiffrar, N Wells, E Castet.   

Abstract

We studied direction discrimination for lines moving obliquely relative to their orientation. Manipulating contrast, length and duration of motion, we found systematic errors in direction discrimination at low contrast, long length and/or short durations. These errors can be accounted for by a competition between ambiguous velocity signals originating from contour motion processing units and signals from line terminator processing units. The dynamic of this competition can be described by a simple model involving two different classes of processing units with different contrast thresholds, different integration time constants and different levels of response saturation.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8333170     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90209-f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  27 in total

1.  Parallel motion processing for the initiation of short-latency ocular following in humans.

Authors:  Guillaume S Masson; Eric Castet
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Direct evidence that "speedlines" influence motion mechanisms.

Authors:  David C Burr; John Ross
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Motion-based prediction is sufficient to solve the aperture problem.

Authors:  Laurent U Perrinet; Guillaume S Masson
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 2.026

4.  The role of V1 surround suppression in MT motion integration.

Authors:  James M G Tsui; J Nicholas Hunter; Richard T Born; Christopher C Pack
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  V1 partially solves the stereo aperture problem.

Authors:  Piers D L Howe; Margaret S Livingstone
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Explaining the footsteps, belly dancer, Wenceslas, and kickback illusions.

Authors:  Piers D L Howe; Peter G Thompson; Stuart M Anstis; Hersh Sagreiya; Margaret S Livingstone
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-12-12       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Two distinct visual motion mechanisms for smooth pursuit: evidence from individual differences.

Authors:  Jeremy B Wilmer; Ken Nakayama
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-06-21       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  The tactile integration of local motion cues is analogous to its visual counterpart.

Authors:  Y C Pei; S S Hsiao; S J Bensmaia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  A new psychophysical estimation of the receptive field size.

Authors:  Arash Yazdanbakhsh; Simone Gori
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 3.046

10.  Action and attentional load can influence aperture effects on motion perception.

Authors:  Patricia R DeLucia; Tammy E Ott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.