Literature DB >> 32584635

Voluntary modification of rapid tactile-motor responses during reaching differs from its visuomotor counterpart.

Sasha Reschechtko1,2,3, J Andrew Pruszynski1,4,2,3,5.   

Abstract

People commonly hold and manipulate a variety of objects in everyday life, and these objects have different physical properties. To successfully control this wide range of objects, people must associate new patterns of tactile stimuli with appropriate motor outputs. We performed a series of experiments investigating the extent to which people can voluntarily modify tactile-motor associations in the context of a rapid tactile-motor response guiding the hand to a moving target (previously described in Pruszynski JA, Johansson RS, Flanagan JR. Curr Biol 26: 788-792, 2016) by using an anti-reach paradigm in which participants were instructed to move their hands in the opposite direction of a target jump. We compared performance to that observed when people make visually guided reaches to a moving target (cf. Day BL, Lyon IN. Exp Brain Res 130: 159-168, 2000; Pisella L, Grea H, Tilikete C, Vighetto A, Desmurget M, Rode G, Boisson D, Rossetti Y. Nat Neurosci 3: 729-736, 2000). When participants had visual feedback, motor responses during the anti-reach task showed early automatic responses toward the moving target before later modification to move in the instructed direction. When the same participants had only tactile feedback, however, they were able to suppress this early phase of the motor response, which occurs <100 ms after the target jump. Our results indicate that while the tactile motor and visual motor systems both support rapid responses that appear similar under some conditions, the circuits underlying responses show sharp distinctions in terms of their malleability.NEW & NOTEWORTHY When people reach toward a visual target that moves suddenly, they automatically correct their reach to follow the object; even when explicitly instructed not to follow a moving visual target, people exhibit an initial incorrect movement before moving in the correct direction. We show that when people use tactile feedback, they do not show an initial incorrect response, even though early muscle activity still occurs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  reaching; reflex; tactile; visual

Year:  2020        PMID: 32584635      PMCID: PMC7474452          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00232.2020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  35 in total

Review 1.  What do reflex and voluntary mean? Modern views on an ancient debate.

Authors:  A Prochazka; F Clarac; G E Loeb; J C Rothwell; J R Wolpaw
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Voluntary modification of automatic arm movements evoked by motion of a visual target.

Authors:  B L Day; I N Lyon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Large-field visual motion directly induces an involuntary rapid manual following response.

Authors:  Naoki Saijo; Ikuya Murakami; Shin'ya Nishida; Hiroaki Gomi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-05-18       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  A Rapid Tactile-Motor Reflex Automatically Guides Reaching toward Handheld Objects.

Authors:  J Andrew Pruszynski; Roland S Johansson; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Programmed and triggered actions to rapid load changes during precision grip.

Authors:  R S Johansson; G Westling
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  An 'automatic pilot' for the hand in human posterior parietal cortex: toward reinterpreting optic ataxia.

Authors:  L Pisella; H Gréa; C Tilikete; A Vighetto; M Desmurget; G Rode; D Boisson; Y Rossetti
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Stretching the skin immediately enhances perceived stiffness and gradually enhances the predictive control of grip force.

Authors:  Mor Farajian; Raz Leib; Hanna Kossowsky; Tomer Zaidenberg; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi; Ilana Nisky
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Spinal Circuits Mediate a Stretch Reflex Between the Upper Limbs in Humans.

Authors:  Tetsuro Muraoka; Isaac Kurtzer
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Grip-force responses to unanticipated object loading: load direction reveals body- and gravity-referenced intrinsic task variables.

Authors:  C Häger-Ross; K J Cole; R S Johansson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Specificity of reflex adaptation for task-relevant variability.

Authors:  David W Franklin; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Efference copy in kinesthetic perception: a copy of what is it?

Authors:  Mark L Latash
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 2.714

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.