Literature DB >> 28856576

Changes in transcranial motor evoked potentials during hemorrhage are associated with increased serum propofol concentrations.

Jeremy A Lieberman1,2, John Feiner3, Mark Rollins3, Russ Lyon4, Paul Jasiukaitis.   

Abstract

Transcranial motor evoked potentials (TcMEPs) monitor the integrity of the spinal cord during spine surgery. Propofol-based anesthesia is favored in order to enhance TcMEP quality. During intraoperative hemorrhage, TcMEP amplitudes may be reduced. The serum concentration of propofol may increase during hemorrhage. No study has determined whether changes in TcMEPs due to hemorrhage are related to changes in propofol blood levels. We monitored TcMEPs, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and cardiac output (CO) and hemoglobin in pigs (n = 6) undergoing controlled progressive hemorrhage during a standardized anesthetic with infusions of propofol, ketamine, and fentanyl. We recorded TcMEPs from the rectus femoris (RF) and tibialis anterior (TA) muscles bilaterally. A pulmonary artery catheter was placed to measure CO. Progressive hemorrhage of 10% blood volume increments was done until TcMEP amplitude decreased by >60% from baseline. Serum propofol levels were also measured following removal of each 10% blood volume increment. TcMEP responses were elicited every 3 min using constant stimulation parameters. We removed between 20 and 50% of total blood volume in order to achieve the >60% reduction in TcMEP amplitude. MAP and CO decreased significantly from baseline. At maximum hemorrhage, TcMEP amplitude decreased in the RF and TA by an average of 73 and 62% respectively from baseline (P < 0.01). Serum propofol levels varied greatly among animals at baseline (range 410-1720 ng/mL) and increased in each animal during hemorrhage. The mean propofol concentration rose from 1190 ± 530 to 2483 ± 968 ng/mL (P < 0.01). The increased propofol concentration correlated with decreased CO. Multivariate analysis using hierarchical linear models indicated that the decline of TcMEP amplitude was primarily associated with rising propofol concentrations, but was also independently affected by reduced CO. We believe that the decrease in blood volume and CO during hemorrhage increased the serum concentration of propofol by reducing the volume of distribution and/or rate of hepatic metabolism of the drug. Despite wide acceptance of propofol as the preferred anesthetic when using TcMEPs, intravenous anesthetics are vulnerable to altered pharmacokinetics during conditions of hemorrhage and could contribute to false-positive TcMEP changes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blood pressure; Cardiac output; Hemorrhage; Propofol; Spinal nerve root monitoring; Transcranial motor evoked potentials

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28856576     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-017-0057-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  41 in total

1.  The effect of two low-dose propofol infusions on the relationship between six-pulse transcranial electrical stimulation and the evoked lower extremity muscle response.

Authors:  E P van Dongen; H T ter Beek; L P Aarts; M A Schepens; W J Morshuis; F J Benning; A de Boer; E H Boezeman
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.105

2.  Rapid measurement of blood propofol levels: a proof of concept study.

Authors:  L McGaughran; L J Voss; R Oliver; M Petcu; P Schaare; J P M Barnard; J W Sleigh
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2006-05-13       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Somatosensory- and motor-evoked potential monitoring without a wake-up test during idiopathic scoliosis surgery. An accepted standard of care.

Authors:  A M Padberg; T J Wilson-Holden; L G Lenke; K H Bridwell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Influence of hemorrhage on propofol pseudo-steady state concentration.

Authors:  Tomiei Kazama; Tadayoshi Kurita; Koji Morita; Jun Nakata; Shigehito Sato
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Influence of hypovolemia on the pharmacokinetics and the electroencephalographic effect of propofol in the rat.

Authors:  P De Paepe; F M Belpaire; M T Rosseel; G Van Hoey; P A Boon; W A Buylaert
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 6.  The evidence for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spine surgery: does it make a difference?

Authors:  Michael G Fehlings; Darrel S Brodke; Daniel C Norvell; Joseph R Dettori
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  The influence of hemorrhagic shock on propofol: a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis.

Authors:  Ken B Johnson; Talmage D Egan; Steven E Kern; Julia L White; Scott W McJames; Noah Syroid; Derek Whiddon; Ty Church
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  Bispectral index, serum drug concentrations and emergence associated with individually adjusted target-controlled infusions of remifentanil and propofol for laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  S C Hoymork; J Raeder; B Grimsmo; P A Steen
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 9.166

9.  Loss of spinal cord monitoring signals in children during thoracic kyphosis correction with spinal osteotomy: why does it occur and what should you do?

Authors:  Gene Cheh; Lawrence G Lenke; Anne M Padberg; Yongjung J Kim; Michael D Daubs; Craig Kuhns; Georgia Stobbs; Marsha Hensley
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Monitoring of nerve root injury using transcranial motor-evoked potentials in a pig model.

Authors:  James M Mok; Russ Lyon; Jeremy A Lieberman; Jordan M Cloyd; Shane Burch
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  3 in total

1.  The influence of depth of anesthesia and blood pressure on muscle recorded motor evoked potentials in spinal surgery. A prospective observational study protocol.

Authors:  Sebastiaan E Dulfer; M M Sahinovic; F Lange; F H Wapstra; D Postmus; A R E Potgieser; C Faber; R J M Groen; A R Absalom; G Drost
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  A Loading Dose of Dexmedetomidine With Constant Infusion Inhibits Intraoperative Neuromonitoring During Thoracic Spinal Decompression Surgery: A Randomized Prospective Study.

Authors:  Tun Liu; Yue Qin; Huaguang Qi; Zhenguo Luo; Liang Yan; Pengfei Yu; Buhuai Dong; Songchuan Zhao; Xucai Wu; Zhen Chang; Zhian Liu; Xuemei Liu; Tao Yuan; Houkun Li; Li Xiao; Gang Wang
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 5.810

3.  Intraoperative Neuromonitoring Auxiliary Significance of DNEP for MEP-positive Event During Severe Spinal Deformity Surgery.

Authors:  Jian Chen; Yao-Long Deng; Wen-Yuan Sui; Jing-Fan Yang; Jing Xu; Zi-Fang Huang; Jun-Lin Yang
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 1.876

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.