Literature DB >> 22549175

Neural mechanisms supporting robust discrimination of spectrally and temporally degraded speech.

Kamalini G Ranasinghe1, William A Vrana, Chanel J Matney, Michael P Kilgard.   

Abstract

Cochlear implants provide good speech discrimination ability despite highly limited amount of information they transmit compared with normal cochlea. Noise vocoded speech, simulating cochlear implants in normal hearing listeners, have demonstrated that spectrally and temporally degraded speech contains sufficient cues to provide accurate speech discrimination. We hypothesized that neural activity patterns generated in the primary auditory cortex by spectrally and temporally degraded speech sounds will account for the robust behavioral discrimination of speech. We examined the behavioral discrimination of noise vocoded consonants and vowels by rats and recorded neural activity patterns from rat primary auditory cortex (A1) for the same sounds. We report the first evidence of behavioral discrimination of degraded speech sounds by an animal model. Our results show that rats are able to accurately discriminate both consonant and vowel sounds even after significant spectral and temporal degradation. The degree of degradation that rats can tolerate is comparable to human listeners. We observed that neural discrimination based on spatiotemporal patterns (spike timing) of A1 neurons is highly correlated with behavioral discrimination of consonants and that neural discrimination based on spatial activity patterns (spike count) of A1 neurons is highly correlated with behavioral discrimination of vowels. The results of the current study indicate that speech discrimination is resistant to degradation as long as the degraded sounds generate distinct patterns of neural activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22549175      PMCID: PMC3387312          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-012-0328-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  60 in total

1.  On the number of channels needed to understand speech.

Authors:  P C Loizou; M Dorman; Z Tu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Correlation between speed perception and neural activity in the middle temporal visual area.

Authors:  Jing Liu; William T Newsome
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-01-19       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Hierarchical and asymmetric temporal sensitivity in human auditory cortices.

Authors:  Anthony Boemio; Stephen Fromm; Allen Braun; David Poeppel
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-02-20       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Relative contributions of spectral and temporal cues for phoneme recognition.

Authors:  Li Xu; Catherine S Thompson; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Response to broadband repetitive stimuli in auditory cortex of the unanesthetized rat.

Authors:  S E Anderson; M P Kilgard; A M Sloan; R L Rennaker
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-02-08       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Spectral and temporal cues in cochlear implant speech perception.

Authors:  Kaibao Nie; Amy Barco; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  A neural network model of temporal code generation and position-invariant pattern recognition.

Authors:  D V Buonomano; M Merzenich
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  1999-01-01       Impact factor: 2.026

8.  Cortical map reorganization enabled by nucleus basalis activity.

Authors:  M P Kilgard; M M Merzenich
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-03-13       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Spectral-ripple representation of steady-state vowels in primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  H Versnel; S A Shamma
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Intracortical responses in human and monkey primary auditory cortex support a temporal processing mechanism for encoding of the voice onset time phonetic parameter.

Authors:  Mitchell Steinschneider; Igor O Volkov; Yonatan I Fishman; Hiroyuki Oya; Joseph C Arezzo; Matthew A Howard
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2004-07-06       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  16 in total

1.  Robust Neuronal Discrimination in Primary Auditory Cortex Despite Degradations of Spectro-temporal Acoustic Details: Comparison Between Guinea Pigs with Normal Hearing and Mild Age-Related Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Yonane Aushana; Samira Souffi; Jean-Marc Edeline; Christian Lorenzi; Chloé Huetz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-01-04

2.  Degraded auditory processing in a rat model of autism limits the speech representation in non-primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  C T Engineer; T M Centanni; K W Im; M S Borland; N A Moreno; R S Carraway; L G Wilson; M P Kilgard
Journal:  Dev Neurobiol       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 3.964

Review 3.  Harnessing plasticity to understand learning and treat disease.

Authors:  Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 13.837

4.  Noise-Sensitive But More Precise Subcortical Representations Coexist with Robust Cortical Encoding of Natural Vocalizations.

Authors:  Samira Souffi; Christian Lorenzi; Léo Varnet; Chloé Huetz; Jean-Marc Edeline
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Increasing diversity of neural responses to speech sounds across the central auditory pathway.

Authors:  K G Ranasinghe; W A Vrana; C J Matney; M P Kilgard
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  Degraded speech sound processing in a rat model of fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Crystal T Engineer; Tracy M Centanni; Kwok W Im; Kimiya C Rahebi; Elizabeth P Buell; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-05       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Detection and identification of speech sounds using cortical activity patterns.

Authors:  T M Centanni; A M Sloan; A C Reed; C T Engineer; R L Rennaker; M P Kilgard
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  Cortical speech-evoked response patterns in multiple auditory fields are correlated with behavioral discrimination ability.

Authors:  T M Centanni; C T Engineer; M P Kilgard
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Knockdown of Dyslexia-Gene Dcdc2 Interferes with Speech Sound Discrimination in Continuous Streams.

Authors:  Tracy Michelle Centanni; Anne B Booker; Fuyi Chen; Andrew M Sloan; Ryan S Carraway; Robert L Rennaker; Joseph J LoTurco; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Knockdown of the dyslexia-associated gene Kiaa0319 impairs temporal responses to speech stimuli in rat primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  T M Centanni; A B Booker; A M Sloan; F Chen; B J Maher; R S Carraway; N Khodaparast; R Rennaker; J J LoTurco; M P Kilgard
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.