Literature DB >> 18520230

Prospective analysis of long-term psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: two-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Study.

Dunya Atisha1, Amy K Alderman, Julie C Lowery, Latoya E Kuhn, Jenny Davis, Edwin G Wilkins.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate the psychosocial outcomes and body image of patients 2 years postmastectomy reconstruction using a multicenter, multisurgeon approach.
BACKGROUND: Although breast reconstruction has been shown to confer significant psychosocial benefits in breast cancer patients at year 1 postreconstruction, we considered the possibility that psychosocial outcomes may remain in a state of flux for years after surgery.
METHODS: Patients were recruited as part of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study, a 12 center, 23 surgeon prospective cohort study of mastectomy reconstruction patients. Two-sided paired sample t tests were used to compare change scores for the various psychosocial subscales. Multiple regression analysis was used to determine whether the magnitude of the change score varied by procedure type.
RESULTS: Preoperative and postoperative year 2 surveys were received from 173 patients; 116 with immediate and 57 with delayed reconstruction. For the immediate reconstruction cohort, significant improvements were observed in all psychosocial subscales except for body image. This occurred essentially independent of procedure type. In the cohort with delayed reconstruction, significant change scores were observed only in body image. Women with transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps had significantly greater gains in body image scores (P = 0.003 and P = 0.034, respectively) when compared with expander/implants.
CONCLUSIONS: General psychosocial benefits and body image gains continued to manifest at 2 years postmastectomy reconstruction. In addition, procedure type had a surprisingly limited effect on psychosocial well being. With outcomes evolving beyond year 1, these data support the need for additional longitudinal breast reconstruction outcome studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18520230     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181728a5c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  72 in total

Review 1.  Nipple-sparing mastectomy--is it worth the risk?

Authors:  Jean-Yves Petit; Umberto Veronesi; Visnu Lohsiriwat; PierCarlo Rey; Giuseppe Curigliano; Stefano Martella; Cristina Garusi; Francesca De Lorenzi; Andrea Manconi; Edoardo Botteri; Florence Didier; Roberto Orecchia; Mario Rietjens
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 2.  Breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Jennica Platt; Nancy Baxter; Toni Zhong
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Elective Revisions after Breast Reconstruction: Results from the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium.

Authors:  Jonas A Nelson; Sophocles H Voineskos; Ji Qi; Hyungjin M Kim; Jennifer B Hamill; Edwin G Wilkins; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Surgeon motivations behind the timing of breast reconstruction in patients requiring postmastectomy radiation therapy.

Authors:  Ming Lee; Erik Reinertsen; Evan McClure; Shuling Liu; Laura Kruper; Neil Tanna; J Brian Boyd; Jay W Granzow
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Should Immediate Autologous Breast Reconstruction Be Considered in Women Who Require Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy? A Prospective Analysis of Outcomes.

Authors:  Jessica Billig; Reshma Jagsi; Ji Qi; Jennifer B Hamill; Hyungjin M Kim; Andrea L Pusic; Edward Buchel; Edwin G Wilkins; Adeyiza O Momoh
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Impact of Radiotherapy on Complications and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Reshma Jagsi; Adeyiza O Momoh; Ji Qi; Jennifer B Hamill; Jessica Billig; Hyungjin M Kim; Andrea L Pusic; Edwin G Wilkins
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Geographic Variation Immediate and Delayed Breast Reconstruction Utilization in Ontario, Canada and Plastic Surgeon Availability: A Population-Based Observational Study.

Authors:  Jennica Platt; Toni Zhong; Rahim Moineddin; Gillian L Booth; Alexandra M Easson; Kimberly Fernandes; Peter Gozdyra; Nancy N Baxter
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 8.  Developing a theoretical framework to illustrate associations among patient satisfaction, body image and quality of life for women undergoing breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Michelle Cororve Fingeret; Summer W Nipomnick; Melissa A Crosby; Gregory P Reece
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 12.111

9.  Trends and variation in use of breast reconstruction in patients with breast cancer undergoing mastectomy in the United States.

Authors:  Reshma Jagsi; Jing Jiang; Adeyiza O Momoh; Amy Alderman; Sharon H Giordano; Thomas A Buchholz; Steven J Kronowitz; Benjamin D Smith
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Quality of life in women following various surgeries of body manipulation: organ transplantation, mastectomy, and breast reconstruction.

Authors:  M Angeles Pérez-San-Gregorio; Eduardo Fernández-Jiménez; Agustín Martín-Rodríguez; Mercedes Borda-Más; M Esther Rincón-Fernández
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2013-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.