Literature DB >> 25896900

Geographic Variation Immediate and Delayed Breast Reconstruction Utilization in Ontario, Canada and Plastic Surgeon Availability: A Population-Based Observational Study.

Jennica Platt1, Toni Zhong, Rahim Moineddin, Gillian L Booth, Alexandra M Easson, Kimberly Fernandes, Peter Gozdyra, Nancy N Baxter.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Utilization of breast reconstruction (BR) is low in many jurisdictions. We studied the geographical and surgical workforce factors that contribute to access and use of BR using a small area analysis approach with a geographical unit of analysis.
METHODS: We linked administrative data from Ontario Canada to calculate the age-standardized rates for immediate BR (IBR) (same time as mastectomy) between 2002 and 2011, and delayed BR (DBR) (within 3 years of mastectomy) for each county. The influence of plastic surgeon access on variation in county rates of BR was examined using Poisson random effects models.
RESULTS: 12,663 women underwent mastectomy in Ontario; 2,948 had BR within 3 years (23.3%). Over 50% of the counties had no access to any plastic surgeon. County IBR rates ranged from 0 to 21.5%; plastic surgeon access explained 46% of geographic variation (p<0.0001). IBR rates in counties with very low, low, and moderate access to plastic surgeons were significantly less than counties with high access (relative rate [RR] 0.48 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.35-0.66], RR 0.61 [CI 0.43-0.87] and RR 0.70 [CI 0.52-0.96], respectively) after adjusting for age and county socioeconomic characteristics. For DBR, while there was less geographic variation, very low access counties demonstrated reduced rates (RR 0.60 [CI 0.47-0.76]).
INTERPRETATION: Geographic access to a plastic surgeon is a major determinant of BR. Targeted interventions for regions without high access to plastic surgeons may improve overall rates and reduce geographic disparities in care, particularly for IBR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25896900     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-015-3060-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  27 in total

1.  Relationship of distance from a radiotherapy facility and initial breast cancer treatment.

Authors:  A B Nattinger; R T Kneusel; R G Hoffmann; M A Gilligan
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-09-05       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Use of breast reconstruction after mastectomy following the Women's Health and Cancer Rights Act.

Authors:  Amy K Alderman; Yongliang Wei; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Quality of life and patient satisfaction in breast cancer patients after immediate breast reconstruction: a prospective study.

Authors:  Elisabeth Edström Elder; Yvonne Brandberg; Tina Björklund; Richard Rylander; Jakob Lagergren; Göran Jurell; Marie Wickman; Kerstin Sandelin
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.380

4.  How far is it to the nearest hospital? Calculating distances using the Statistics Canada Postal Code Conversion File.

Authors:  E Ng; R Wilkins; A Perras
Journal:  Health Rep       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.796

5.  Correlates of referral practices of general surgeons to plastic surgeons for mastectomy reconstruction.

Authors:  Amy K Alderman; Sarah T Hawley; Jennifer Waljee; Monica Morrow; Steven J Katz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  The influence of sociodemographic factors and hospital characteristics on the method of breast reconstruction, including microsurgery: a U.S. population-based study.

Authors:  Claudia R Albornoz; Peter B Bach; Andrea L Pusic; Colleen M McCarthy; Babak J Mehrara; Joseph J Disa; Peter G Cordeiro; Evan Matros
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Regional variation in use of immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer in England.

Authors:  R Jeevan; D A Cromwell; J P Browne; M Trivella; J Pereira; C M Caddy; C Sheppard; J H P van der Meulen
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 4.424

8.  Geographic variation in postmastectomy breast reconstruction rates.

Authors:  A P Polednak
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Financial impact of breast reconstruction on an academic surgical practice.

Authors:  Amy K Alderman; Amy F Storey; Nita S Nair; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  Prospective analysis of long-term psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: two-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Study.

Authors:  Dunya Atisha; Amy K Alderman; Julie C Lowery; Latoya E Kuhn; Jenny Davis; Edwin G Wilkins
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  12 in total

1.  Breast reconstruction: no need to “break new ground”

Authors:  Douglas Ross
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Author response to “Breast reconstruction: no need to ‘break new ground’”

Authors:  Lashan Peiris
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Achieving consistent and equitable access to post mastectomy breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Anne C O'Neill
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-08

4.  Relation between socioeconomic variables and surgical, systemic and radiation treatment in a cohort of patients with breast cancer in an urban Canadian centre

Authors:  Jennifer Li; Sylvie D. Cornacchi; Forough Farrokhyar; Neil Johnston; Shawn Forbes; Susan Reid; Nicole Hodgson; Sarah Lovrics; Kristen Lucibello; Peter Lovrics
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy rate stable at major Canadian breast cancer center.

Authors:  Amanda Roberts; Lakhbir Sandhu; Tulin D Cil; Stefan O P Hofer; Toni Zhong
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-06-10

6.  The Impact of Angelina Jolie (AJ)'s Story on Genetic Referral and Testing at an Academic Cancer Centre in Canada.

Authors:  Jacques Raphael; Sunil Verma; Paul Hewitt; Andrea Eisen
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Survival Differences in Women with and without Autologous Breast Reconstruction after Mastectomy for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  John L Semple; Kelly Metcalfe; Farah Shoukat; Ping Sun; Steven Narod
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-04-03

8.  How patient acceptability affects access to breast reconstruction: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Helene Retrouvey; Toni Zhong; Anna R Gagliardi; Nancy N Baxter; Fiona Webster
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Breast Reconstruction: A Canadian Perspective.

Authors:  Caroline F Illmann; Christopher Doherty; Margaret Wheelock; Joshua Vorstenbosch; Joan E Lipa; Toni Zhong; Kathryn V Isaac
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 0.947

Review 10.  Psychosocial Aspects of Immediate versus Delayed Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Anne-Sophie Heimes; Kathrin Stewen; Annette Hasenburg
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.