Literature DB >> 18514954

Recent trends in utilization rates of abdominal imaging: the relative roles of radiologists and nonradiologist physicians.

David C Levin1, Vijay M Rao, Laurence Parker, Andrea J Frangos, Jonathan H Sunshine.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To study recent trends in the utilization of abdominal imaging in the Medicare population.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Medicare Part B databases for 1996 through 2005 were reviewed, and all Current Procedural Terminology, 4th ed, codes pertaining to noninvasive imaging of the abdomen and pelvis were identified. The codes were grouped into 6 categories: (1) computed tomography (CT) and CT angiography, (2) magnetic resonance (MR) and MR angiography, (3) ultrasound, (4) radionuclide imaging, (5) plain radiography, and (6) gastrointestinal fluoroscopy. Global and professional-component claims from all places of service were tabulated for the 6 categories. Utilization rates per 1,000 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries were calculated. Medicare physician specialty codes were used to identify examinations by radiologists and nonradiologist physicians. Overall utilization trends were studied, as were those among radiologists and nonradiologists.
RESULTS: In 1996, an overall total of 451.8 abdominal imaging examinations were performed per 1,000 Medicare beneficiaries, increasing to 564.5 in 2005 (+25%). The greatest growth was seen in computed tomography and computed tomographic angiography, which rose from 99.4 examinations in 1996 to 239.3 in 2005 (+141%). Ultrasound increased from 126.6 examinations in 1996 to 142.2 in 2005 (+12%). Plain abdominal radiographic examinations decreased from 144.1 to 125.4 (-13%), and gastrointestinal fluoroscopic examinations decreased from 67.3 to 34.8 (-48%). The utilization of MR and MR angiography and radionuclide imaging was far lower. Radiologists' market share of abdominal imaging was 88% in 1996 and 90% in 2005. Between 1996 and 2005, the utilization rate among radiologists increased by 29%, compared with 11% among nonradiologist physicians.
CONCLUSIONS: In recent years, the increase in the utilization rate of abdominal imaging among the Medicare population was relatively moderate (25% over 9 years). There was a substantial increase in the use of computed tomography and computed tomographic angiography and a smaller increase in the use of ultrasound. The use of plain radiography and gastrointestinal fluoroscopy declined. Radiologists strongly predominate in abdominal imaging, and this may be one reason why growth has been modest.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18514954     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2007.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  14 in total

1.  Effect of advanced imaging technology on how biopsies are done and who does them.

Authors:  Sharon W Kwan; Mythreyi Bhargavan; Robert K Kerlan; Jonathan H Sunshine
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Trends in the Use of Medical Imaging to Diagnose Appendicitis at an Academic Medical Center.

Authors:  Michael D Repplinger; Andrew C Weber; Perry J Pickhardt; Victoria P Rajamanickam; James E Svenson; William J Ehlenbach; Ryan P Westergaard; Scott B Reeder; Elizabeth A Jacobs
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 5.532

3.  An algorithm for intelligent sorting of CT-related dose parameters.

Authors:  Tessa S Cook; Stefan L Zimmerman; Scott R Steingall; William W Boonn; Woojin Kim
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  An interactive RADIANCE toolkit for customizable CT dose monitoring and reporting.

Authors:  Tessa S Cook; Anand Sundaram; William W Boonn; Woojin Kim
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Changes in abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture and short-term mortality, 1995-2008: a retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Marc L Schermerhorn; Rodney P Bensley; Kristina A Giles; Rob Hurks; A James Oʼmalley; Philip Cotterill; Elliot Chaikof; Bruce E Landon
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Which patients with dilated common bile and/or pancreatic ducts have positive findings on EUS?

Authors:  Vernon Carriere; Jason Conway; Jerry Evans; Susanne Shokoohi; Girish Mishra
Journal:  J Interv Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-10-01

7.  Utility of repeated abdominal CT scans after prior negative CT scans in patients presenting to ER with nontraumatic abdominal pain.

Authors:  Borko Nojkov; Michael C Duffy; Mitchell S Cappell
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Major radiodiagnostic imaging in pregnancy and the risk of childhood malignancy: a population-based cohort study in Ontario.

Authors:  Joel G Ray; Michael J Schull; Marcelo L Urquia; John J You; Astrid Guttmann; Marian J Vermeulen
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 11.069

9.  Abdominal imaging utilization in the emergency department: trends over two decades.

Authors:  Ali S Raja; Koenraad J Mortele; Richard Hanson; Aaron D Sodickson; Richard Zane; Ramin Khorasani
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2011-04-27

10.  Impact of the Publication of Appropriate Use Criteria on Utilization Rates of Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Studies in Ontario, Canada: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Idan Roifman; Peter C Austin; Feng Qiu; Harindra C Wijeysundera
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.