Michael D Repplinger1, Andrew C Weber2, Perry J Pickhardt3, Victoria P Rajamanickam4, James E Svenson2, William J Ehlenbach5, Ryan P Westergaard5, Scott B Reeder6, Elizabeth A Jacobs7. 1. BerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin; Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin. Electronic address: mdreppli@medicine.wisc.edu. 2. BerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin. 3. Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin. 4. Department of Biostatistics & Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin. 5. Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin. 6. BerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin; Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin; Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin; Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin. 7. BerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin; Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To quantify the trends in imaging use for the diagnosis of appendicitis. METHODS: A retrospective study covering a 22-year period was conducted at an academic medical center. Patients were identified by International Classification of Diseases-9 diagnosis code for appendicitis. Medical record data extraction of these patients included imaging test used (ultrasound, CT, or MRI), gender, age, and body mass index (BMI). The proportion of patients undergoing each scan was calculated by year. Regression analysis was performed to determine whether age, gender, or BMI affected imaging choice. RESULTS: The study included a total of 2,108 patients, including 967 (43.5%) females and 599 (27%) children (<18 years old). CT use increased over time for the entire cohort (2.9% to 82.4%, P < .0001), and each subgroup (males, females, adults, children; P < .0001 for each). CT use increased more in females and adults than in males and children, but differences in trends were not statistically significant (male versus female, P = .8; adult versus child, P = .1). The percentage of patients who had no imaging used for the diagnosis of appendicitis decreased over time (P < .0001 overall and for each subgroup), and no difference was found in trends between complementary subgroups (male versus female, P = .53; adult versus child, P = .66). No statistically significant changes were found in use of ultrasound or MRI over the study period. With increasing BMI, CT was more frequently used. CONCLUSIONS: Of those diagnosed with appendicitis at an academic medical center, CT use increased more than 20-fold. However, no statistically significant trend was found for increased use of ultrasound or MRI.
OBJECTIVE: To quantify the trends in imaging use for the diagnosis of appendicitis. METHODS: A retrospective study covering a 22-year period was conducted at an academic medical center. Patients were identified by International Classification of Diseases-9 diagnosis code for appendicitis. Medical record data extraction of these patients included imaging test used (ultrasound, CT, or MRI), gender, age, and body mass index (BMI). The proportion of patients undergoing each scan was calculated by year. Regression analysis was performed to determine whether age, gender, or BMI affected imaging choice. RESULTS: The study included a total of 2,108 patients, including 967 (43.5%) females and 599 (27%) children (<18 years old). CT use increased over time for the entire cohort (2.9% to 82.4%, P < .0001), and each subgroup (males, females, adults, children; P < .0001 for each). CT use increased more in females and adults than in males and children, but differences in trends were not statistically significant (male versus female, P = .8; adult versus child, P = .1). The percentage of patients who had no imaging used for the diagnosis of appendicitis decreased over time (P < .0001 overall and for each subgroup), and no difference was found in trends between complementary subgroups (male versus female, P = .53; adult versus child, P = .66). No statistically significant changes were found in use of ultrasound or MRI over the study period. With increasing BMI, CT was more frequently used. CONCLUSIONS: Of those diagnosed with appendicitis at an academic medical center, CT use increased more than 20-fold. However, no statistically significant trend was found for increased use of ultrasound or MRI.
Authors: Vijay M Rao; David C Levin; Laurence Parker; Andrea J Frangos; Jonathan H Sunshine Journal: J Am Coll Radiol Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: David C Levin; Vijay M Rao; Laurence Parker; Andrea J Frangos; Jonathan H Sunshine Journal: J Am Coll Radiol Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: Meera Kotagal; Morgan K Richards; Teresa Chapman; Lisa Finch; Bessie McCann; Amaya Ormazabal; Robert J Rush; Adam B Goldin Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2015-02-24 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: David A Partrick; James E Janik; Joseph S Janik; Denis D Bensard; Frederick M Karrer Journal: J Pediatr Surg Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 2.545
Authors: Joseph Cuschieri; Michael Florence; David R Flum; Gregory J Jurkovich; Paul Lin; Scott R Steele; Rebecca Gaston Symons; Richard Thirlby Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: M M N Leeuwenburgh; M J Wiezer; B M Wiarda; W H Bouma; S S K S Phoa; H B A C Stockmann; S Jensch; P M M Bossuyt; M A Boermeester; J Stoker Journal: Br J Surg Date: 2013-11-22 Impact factor: 6.939
Authors: John B Harringa; Rebecca L Bracken; John C Davis; Lu Mao; Douglas R Kitchin; Jessica B Robbins; Timothy J Ziemlewicz; Perry J Pickhardt; Scott B Reeder; Michael D Repplinger Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2019-03-20 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Michael D Repplinger; Perry J Pickhardt; Jessica B Robbins; Douglas R Kitchin; Tim J Ziemlewicz; Scott J Hetzel; Sean K Golden; John B Harringa; Scott B Reeder Journal: Radiology Date: 2018-04-24 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Claudia Martinez-Rios; Jennifer R McKinney; Nadine Al-Aswad; Arvind K Shergill; Ada F Louffat; Lillian Sung; Karen E Thomas; Suzanne Schuh; George Tomlinson; Rahim Moineddin; Andrea S Doria Journal: Paediatr Child Health Date: 2018-12-17 Impact factor: 2.253
Authors: Kristy R Kutanzi; Annie Lumen; Igor Koturbash; Isabelle R Miousse Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2016-10-28 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Rebecca L Bracken; John B Harringa; B Keegan Markhardt; Newrhee Kim; John K Park; Douglas R Kitchin; Jessica B Robbins; Timothy J Ziemlewicz; Jen Birstler; Michael J Ryan; Ly Hoang; Perry J Pickhardt; Scott B Reeder; Michael D Repplinger Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2021-07-16 Impact factor: 5.315