Literature DB >> 27053160

Trends in the Use of Medical Imaging to Diagnose Appendicitis at an Academic Medical Center.

Michael D Repplinger1, Andrew C Weber2, Perry J Pickhardt3, Victoria P Rajamanickam4, James E Svenson2, William J Ehlenbach5, Ryan P Westergaard5, Scott B Reeder6, Elizabeth A Jacobs7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the trends in imaging use for the diagnosis of appendicitis.
METHODS: A retrospective study covering a 22-year period was conducted at an academic medical center. Patients were identified by International Classification of Diseases-9 diagnosis code for appendicitis. Medical record data extraction of these patients included imaging test used (ultrasound, CT, or MRI), gender, age, and body mass index (BMI). The proportion of patients undergoing each scan was calculated by year. Regression analysis was performed to determine whether age, gender, or BMI affected imaging choice.
RESULTS: The study included a total of 2,108 patients, including 967 (43.5%) females and 599 (27%) children (<18 years old). CT use increased over time for the entire cohort (2.9% to 82.4%, P < .0001), and each subgroup (males, females, adults, children; P < .0001 for each). CT use increased more in females and adults than in males and children, but differences in trends were not statistically significant (male versus female, P = .8; adult versus child, P = .1). The percentage of patients who had no imaging used for the diagnosis of appendicitis decreased over time (P < .0001 overall and for each subgroup), and no difference was found in trends between complementary subgroups (male versus female, P = .53; adult versus child, P = .66). No statistically significant changes were found in use of ultrasound or MRI over the study period. With increasing BMI, CT was more frequently used.
CONCLUSIONS: Of those diagnosed with appendicitis at an academic medical center, CT use increased more than 20-fold. However, no statistically significant trend was found for increased use of ultrasound or MRI.
Copyright © 2016 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Appendicitis; CT; MRI; resource utilization; ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27053160      PMCID: PMC5012945          DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.02.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  36 in total

1.  Trends in utilization rates of the various imaging modalities in emergency departments: nationwide Medicare data from 2000 to 2008.

Authors:  Vijay M Rao; David C Levin; Laurence Parker; Andrea J Frangos; Jonathan H Sunshine
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.532

2.  Balancing the normal appendectomy rate with the perforated appendicitis rate: implications for quality assurance.

Authors:  V Velanovich; R Satava
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 0.688

3.  The impact of helical computed tomography on the negative appendectomy rate: a multi-center comparison.

Authors:  Kyuseok Kim; Christopher C Lee; Kyoung-Jun Song; Woojeong Kim; Giljoon Suh; Adam J Singer
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 1.484

4.  Recent trends in utilization rates of abdominal imaging: the relative roles of radiologists and nonradiologist physicians.

Authors:  David C Levin; Vijay M Rao; Laurence Parker; Andrea J Frangos; Jonathan H Sunshine
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.532

5.  Looking through the retrospectoscope: reducing bias in emergency medicine chart review studies.

Authors:  Amy H Kaji; David Schriger; Steven Green
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 5.721

6.  Advanced radiologic imaging for pediatric appendicitis, 2005-2009: trends and outcomes.

Authors:  Richard G Bachur; Kara Hennelly; Michael J Callahan; Michael C Monuteaux
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 4.406

7.  Improving ultrasound quality to reduce computed tomography use in pediatric appendicitis: the Safe and Sound campaign.

Authors:  Meera Kotagal; Morgan K Richards; Teresa Chapman; Lisa Finch; Bessie McCann; Amaya Ormazabal; Robert J Rush; Adam B Goldin
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Increased CT scan utilization does not improve the diagnostic accuracy of appendicitis in children.

Authors:  David A Partrick; James E Janik; Joseph S Janik; Denis D Bensard; Frederick M Karrer
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.545

9.  Negative appendectomy and imaging accuracy in the Washington State Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program.

Authors:  Joseph Cuschieri; Michael Florence; David R Flum; Gregory J Jurkovich; Paul Lin; Scott R Steele; Rebecca Gaston Symons; Richard Thirlby
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Accuracy of MRI compared with ultrasound imaging and selective use of CT to discriminate simple from perforated appendicitis.

Authors:  M M N Leeuwenburgh; M J Wiezer; B M Wiarda; W H Bouma; S S K S Phoa; H B A C Stockmann; S Jensch; P M M Bossuyt; M A Boermeester; J Stoker
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  5 in total

1.  Prospective evaluation of MRI compared with CT for the etiology of abdominal pain in emergency department patients with concern for appendicitis.

Authors:  John B Harringa; Rebecca L Bracken; John C Davis; Lu Mao; Douglas R Kitchin; Jessica B Robbins; Timothy J Ziemlewicz; Perry J Pickhardt; Scott B Reeder; Michael D Repplinger
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Prospective Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of MR Imaging versus CT for Acute Appendicitis.

Authors:  Michael D Repplinger; Perry J Pickhardt; Jessica B Robbins; Douglas R Kitchin; Tim J Ziemlewicz; Scott J Hetzel; Sean K Golden; John B Harringa; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Parental preferences on diagnostic imaging tests for paediatric appendicitis.

Authors:  Claudia Martinez-Rios; Jennifer R McKinney; Nadine Al-Aswad; Arvind K Shergill; Ada F Louffat; Lillian Sung; Karen E Thomas; Suzanne Schuh; George Tomlinson; Rahim Moineddin; Andrea S Doria
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 2.253

Review 4.  Pediatric Exposures to Ionizing Radiation: Carcinogenic Considerations.

Authors:  Kristy R Kutanzi; Annie Lumen; Igor Koturbash; Isabelle R Miousse
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Abdominal fellowship-trained versus generalist radiologist accuracy when interpreting MR and CT for the diagnosis of appendicitis.

Authors:  Rebecca L Bracken; John B Harringa; B Keegan Markhardt; Newrhee Kim; John K Park; Douglas R Kitchin; Jessica B Robbins; Timothy J Ziemlewicz; Jen Birstler; Michael J Ryan; Ly Hoang; Perry J Pickhardt; Scott B Reeder; Michael D Repplinger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 5.315

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.