Literature DB >> 20587643

Effect of advanced imaging technology on how biopsies are done and who does them.

Sharon W Kwan1, Mythreyi Bhargavan, Robert K Kerlan, Jonathan H Sunshine.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess national levels and trends in utilization of biopsy procedures during the past decade and investigate the relative roles of biopsy approaches (open, endoscopic, and percutaneous) and physician specialties.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval was not necessary because only public domain data were used. Aggregated Medicare claims data were used to determine utilization of biopsies performed in 10 anatomic regions from 1997 to 2008. Utilization levels according to biopsy approach and anatomic region were calculated. Trends in the relative utilization of percutaneous needle biopsy (PNB) and imaging-guided percutaneous biopsy (IGPB) were assessed. The relative roles of radiologists and nonradiologists in the performance of all biopsies, PNBs, and IGPBs were evaluated.
RESULTS: Biopsy procedures with all approaches increased from 1380 to 1945 biopsies per 100,000 Medicare enrollees between 1997 and 2008, which represents a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 3%. Utilization of non-PNBs fell, while the absolute level and relative share of PNBs increased. In 2008, 67% of all biopsies were performed by using a percutaneous route. IGPB as a percentage of all PNBs increased over time in the regions for which data were available. Radiology was the leading specialty providing biopsy services. The total number of biopsies performed by radiologists increased at a CAGR of 8%, and radiologists' share of all biopsies increased from 35% to 56%.
CONCLUSION: During the past decade, there was continuing substitution away from invasive approaches and non-imaging-guided percutaneous approaches in favor of PNBs and IGPBs, likely related to increasing use of advanced imaging modalities for biopsy guidance. Consequently, radiologists are performing an increasing share of biopsies across all anatomic regions. (c) RSNA, 2010.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20587643      PMCID: PMC2923730          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10092130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  22 in total

1.  Cardiovascular imaging: who does it and how important is it to the practice of radiology?

Authors:  David C Levin; Laurence Parker; Jonathan H Sunshine; Michael J Pentecost
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Fatal intrathoracic hemorrhage after percutaneous aspiration lung biopsy.

Authors:  L B Milner; K Ryan; J Gullo
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 3.  Percutaneous image-guided core breast biopsy.

Authors:  Laura Liberman
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.303

4.  Endovascular repair vs open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: comparative utilization trends from 2001 to 2006.

Authors:  David C Levin; Vijay M Rao; Laurence Parker; Andrea J Frangos; Jonathan H Sunshine
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.532

5.  Recent trends in utilization rates of abdominal imaging: the relative roles of radiologists and nonradiologist physicians.

Authors:  David C Levin; Vijay M Rao; Laurence Parker; Andrea J Frangos; Jonathan H Sunshine
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.532

6.  Comparison of the costs of fine-needle aspiration and open surgical biopsy as methods for obtaining a pathologic diagnosis.

Authors:  D L Rimm; J F Stastny; E B Rimm; S Ayer; W J Frable
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1997-02-25       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Guided versus blind liver biopsy for chronic hepatitis C: clinical benefits and costs.

Authors:  R J Farrell; P F Smiddy; R M Pilkington; A A Tobin; E E Mooney; I J Temperley; G S McDonald; H A Bowmer; G F Wilson; D Kelleher
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 25.083

8.  Image-guided automated core biopsies of the breast, chest, abdomen, and pelvis.

Authors:  F Burbank; K Kaye; J Belville; J Ekuan; M Blumenfeld
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Impact of core-needle breast biopsy on the surgical management of mammographic abnormalities.

Authors:  R R White; T J Halperin; J A Olson ; M S Soo; R C Bentley; H F Seigler
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Percutaneous renal biopsy: comparison of blind and real-time ultrasound-guided technique.

Authors:  Ivan D Maya; Prathyusha Maddela; Jill Barker; Michael Allon
Journal:  Semin Dial       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.455

View more
  13 in total

1.  Stepping out further from the shadows: disclosure of harmful radiologic errors to patients.

Authors:  Stephen D Brown; Constance D Lehman; Robert D Truog; David M Browning; Thomas H Gallagher
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Image-Guided Biopsy in the Era of Personalized Cancer Care: Proceedings from the Society of Interventional Radiology Research Consensus Panel.

Authors:  Alda L Tam; Howard J Lim; Ignacio I Wistuba; Anobel Tamrazi; Michael D Kuo; Etay Ziv; Stephen Wong; Albert J Shih; Robert J Webster; Gregory S Fischer; Sunitha Nagrath; Suzanne E Davis; Sarah B White; Kamran Ahrar
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 3.464

3.  Informatics technology mimics ecology: dense, mutualistic collaboration networks are associated with higher publication rates.

Authors:  Marco D Sorani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Major bleeding after percutaneous image-guided biopsies: frequency, predictors, and periprocedural management.

Authors:  Sean A Kennedy; Lazar Milovanovic; Mehran Midia
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 5.  Lung and Abdominal Biopsies in the Age of Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Leonard Dalag; Jonathan K Fergus; Steven M Zangan
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 1.513

6.  The value of ultrasound elastography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of thyroid nodules in reducing nondiagnostic results.

Authors:  Duzgun Yildirim; Bengi Gurses; Berk Gurpinar; Baki Ekci; Bulent Colakoglu; Mutlu Sahin; Ahmet Kaur
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 7.  The Importance of Biopsy in the Era of Molecular Medicine.

Authors:  Etay Ziv; Jeremy C Durack; Stephen B Solomon
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.360

8.  Breast cancer detection with short-interval follow-up compared with return to annual screening in patients with benign stereotactic or US-guided breast biopsy results.

Authors:  Jason M Johnson; Alisa K Johnson; Ellen S O'Meara; Diana L Miglioretti; Berta M Geller; Elise N Hotaling; Sally D Herschorn
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Efficacy of a Self-expanding Tract Sealant Device in the Reduction of Pneumothorax and Chest Tube Placement Rates After Percutaneous Lung Biopsy: A Matched Controlled Study Using Propensity Score Analysis.

Authors:  Judy U Ahrar; Sanjay Gupta; Joe E Ensor; Armeen Mahvash; Sharjeel H Sabir; Joseph R Steele; Stephen E McRae; Rony Avritscher; Steven Y Huang; Bruno C Odisio; Ravi Murthy; Kamran Ahrar; Michael J Wallace; Alda L Tam
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 2.740

10.  Portosystemic Shunts: Stable Utilization and Improved Outcomes, Two Decades After the Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt.

Authors:  Brandon C Perry; Sharon W Kwan
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 5.532

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.