Literature DB >> 21796491

An algorithm for intelligent sorting of CT-related dose parameters.

Tessa S Cook1, Stefan L Zimmerman, Scott R Steingall, William W Boonn, Woojin Kim.   

Abstract

Imaging centers nationwide are seeking innovative means to record and monitor computed tomography (CT)-related radiation dose in light of multiple instances of patient overexposure to medical radiation. As a solution, we have developed RADIANCE, an automated pipeline for extraction, archival, and reporting of CT-related dose parameters. Estimation of whole-body effective dose from CT dose length product (DLP)--an indirect estimate of radiation dose--requires anatomy-specific conversion factors that cannot be applied to total DLP, but instead necessitate individual anatomy-based DLPs. A challenge exists because the total DLP reported on a dose sheet often includes multiple separate examinations (e.g., chest CT followed by abdominopelvic CT). Furthermore, the individual reported series DLPs may not be clearly or consistently labeled. For example, "arterial" could refer to the arterial phase of the triple liver CT or the arterial phase of a CT angiogram. To address this problem, we have designed an intelligent algorithm to parse dose sheets for multi-series CT examinations and correctly separate the total DLP into its anatomic components. The algorithm uses information from the departmental PACS to determine how many distinct CT examinations were concurrently performed. Then, it matches the number of distinct accession numbers to the series that were acquired and anatomically matches individual series DLPs to their appropriate CT examinations. This algorithm allows for more accurate dose analytics, but there remain instances where automatic sorting is not feasible. To ultimately improve radiology patient care, we must standardize series names and exam names to unequivocally sort exams by anatomy and correctly estimate whole-body effective dose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21796491      PMCID: PMC3264706          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-011-9410-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  12 in total

1.  Nationwide trends in rates of utilization of noninvasive diagnostic imaging among the Medicare population between 1993 and 1999.

Authors:  Andrea J Maitino; David C Levin; Laurence Parker; Vijay M Rao; Jonathan H Sunshine
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Estimating effective dose for CT using dose-length product compared with using organ doses: consequences of adopting International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 103 or dual-energy scanning.

Authors:  Jodie A Christner; James M Kofler; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Health effects of ionising radiation from diagnostic CT.

Authors:  Diego R Martin; Richard C Semelka
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-05-27       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 4.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Eric J Hall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine.

Authors:  E Stephen Amis; Priscilla F Butler; Kimberly E Applegate; Steven B Birnbaum; Libby F Brateman; James M Hevezi; Fred A Mettler; Richard L Morin; Michael J Pentecost; Geoffrey G Smith; Keith J Strauss; Robert K Zeman
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.532

6.  The 'Image Gently' campaign: increasing CT radiation dose awareness through a national education and awareness program.

Authors:  Marilyn J Goske; Kimberly E Applegate; Jennifer Boylan; Penny F Butler; Michael J Callahan; Brian D Coley; Shawn Farley; Donald P Frush; Marta Hernanz-Schulman; Diego Jaramillo; Neil D Johnson; Sue C Kaste; Gregory Morrison; Keith J Strauss; Nora Tuggle
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2008-01-17

7.  Automated extraction of radiation dose information for CT examinations.

Authors:  Tessa S Cook; Stefan Zimmerman; Andrew D A Maidment; Woojin Kim; William W Boonn
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.532

8.  Tracking radiation exposure from diagnostic imaging devices at the NIH.

Authors:  Ronald D Neumann; David A Bluemke
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 5.532

9.  Radiation risk to children from computed tomography.

Authors:  Alan S Brody; Donald P Frush; Walter Huda; Robert L Brent
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007.

Authors:  Amy Berrington de González; Mahadevappa Mahesh; Kwang-Pyo Kim; Mythreyi Bhargavan; Rebecca Lewis; Fred Mettler; Charles Land
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-12-14
View more
  2 in total

1.  Opportunities to Reduce CT Radiation Exposure, Experience Over 5 Years at the NIH Clinical Center.

Authors:  William C Kovacs; Jianhua Yao; David A Bluemke; Les R Folio
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 0.972

2.  Role of dual energy spectral computed tomography in characterization of hepatocellular carcinoma: Initial experience from a tertiary liver care institute.

Authors:  S T Laroia; Ajeet Singh Bhadoria; Yamini Venigalla; G K Chibber; Chagan Bihari; Archana Rastogi; S K Sarin
Journal:  Eur J Radiol Open       Date:  2016-07-20
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.