Literature DB >> 18505320

Contingent attentional capture by top-down control settings: converging evidence from event-related potentials.

Mei-Ching Lien1, Eric Ruthruff, Zachary Goodin, Roger W Remington.   

Abstract

Theories of attentional control are divided over whether the capture of spatial attention depends primarily on stimulus salience or is contingent on attentional control settings induced by task demands. The authors addressed this issue using the N2-posterior- contralateral (N2pc) effect, a component of the event-related brain potential thought to reflect attentional allocation. They presented a cue display followed by a target display of 4 letters. Each display contained a green item and a red item. Some participants responded to the red letter and others to the green letter. Converging lines of evidence indicated that attention was captured by the cues with the same color as the target. First, these target-color cues produced a cuing validity effect on behavioral measures. Second, distractors appearing in the cued location produced larger compatibility effects. Third, the target-color cue produced a robust N2pc effect, similar in magnitude to the N2pc effect to the target itself. Furthermore, the target-color cue elicited a similar N2pc effect regardless of whether it competed with a simultaneous abrupt onset. The findings provide converging evidence for attentional capture contingent on top-down control settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18505320     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.3.509

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  41 in total

1.  Nasotemporal ERP differences: evidence for increased inhibition of temporal distractors.

Authors:  Christoph Huber-Huber; Anna Grubert; Ulrich Ansorge; Martin Eimer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  A meta-analysis of contingent-capture effects.

Authors:  Christian Büsel; Martin Voracek; Ulrich Ansorge
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-08-31

3.  Capture versus suppression of attention by salient singletons: electrophysiological evidence for an automatic attend-to-me signal.

Authors:  Risa Sawaki; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 4.  A value-driven mechanism of attentional selection.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Hidden from view: Statistical learning exposes latent attentional capture.

Authors:  Matthew D Hilchey; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-10

6.  Attentional capture by completely task-irrelevant faces.

Authors:  Shiori Sato; Jun I Kawahara
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-07-17

7.  Early information processing contributions to object individuation revealed by perception of illusory figures.

Authors:  Claire K Naughtin; Jason B Mattingley; Paul E Dux
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Active suppression after involuntary capture of attention.

Authors:  Risa Sawaki; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-04

9.  Neural responses to target features outside a search array are enhanced during conjunction but not unique-feature search.

Authors:  David R Painter; Paul E Dux; Susan L Travis; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  The time course of exogenous and endogenous control of covert attention.

Authors:  Clayton Hickey; Wieske van Zoest; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.