Literature DB >> 25030814

Attentional capture by completely task-irrelevant faces.

Shiori Sato1, Jun I Kawahara.   

Abstract

The present study investigated whether faces capture attention regardless of attentional set. The presentation of a face as a distractor during a visual search has been shown to impair performance relative to when the face was absent, implying that faces automatically attract attention. If attentional control is contingent on the observer's current goal, faces should not capture attention when they are irrelevant to the observer's attentional set. Previous studies demonstrating face-induced attentional capture used faces that were relevant to the task. Thus, a task in which faces were completely irrelevant to the observer's set was created. Participants identified a target letter among heterogeneously colored non-targets while ignoring a peripheral facial image that appeared as a brief distractor. No face-specific capture was observed when the target-distractor stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) was long (Experiment 1). When the SOA was shortened, attentional capture by irrelevant faces was observed (Experiment 2). Experiment 3 extended this finding to all conditions, regardless of the attractiveness of faces. No such capture effect was found in Experiment 4 with inverted-face distractors. These results indicate that completely task-irrelevant faces break through top-down attentional set given a brief distractor-target SOA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25030814     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-014-0599-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  37 in total

1.  Differential attentional guidance by unattended faces expressing positive and negative emotion.

Authors:  J D Eastwood; D Smilek; P M Merikle
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-08

2.  Rapid natural scene categorization in the near absence of attention.

Authors:  Fei Fei Li; Rufin VanRullen; Christof Koch; Pietro Perona
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Is it an animal? Is it a human face? Fast processing in upright and inverted natural scenes.

Authors:  Guillaume A Rousselet; Marc J-M Macé; Michèle Fabre-Thorpe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Top-down contingencies in peripheral cuing: The roles of color and location.

Authors:  Ulrich Ansorge; Manfred Heumann
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 5.  Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection.

Authors:  Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2010-05-26

6.  The control of attention to faces.

Authors:  Markus Bindemann; A Mike Burton; Stephen R H Langton; Stefan R Schweinberger; Martin J Doherty
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-07-27       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Task-demands can immediately reverse the effects of sensory-driven saliency in complex visual stimuli.

Authors:  Wolfgang Einhäuser; Ueli Rutishauser; Christof Koch
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Abrupt onsets capture attention independent of top-down control settings.

Authors:  Daniel Schreij; Calebn Owens; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2008-02

9.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

10.  Attentional capture by the onset and offset of motion signals outside the spatial focus of attention.

Authors:  Jun Kawahara; Kaori Yanase; Michiteru Kitazaki
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 2.240

View more
  7 in total

1.  Attentional capture by spatiotemporally task-irrelevant faces: supportive evidence for Sato and Kawahara (2015).

Authors:  Atsunori Ariga; Katsuhiko Arihara
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-04-28

2.  Transient Distraction and Attentional Control during a Sustained Selective Attention Task.

Authors:  Elise Demeter; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Speech-accompanying gestures are not processed by the language-processing mechanisms.

Authors:  Olessia Jouravlev; David Zheng; Zuzanna Balewski; Alvince Le Arnz Pongos; Zena Levan; Susan Goldin-Meadow; Evelina Fedorenko
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Infrequent faces bias social attention differently in manual and oculomotor measures.

Authors:  Effie J Pereira; Elina Birmingham; Jelena Ristic
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  The Contribution of Attention to the Mere Exposure Effect for Parts of Advertising Images.

Authors:  Yoshihiko Yagi; Kazuya Inoue
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-09-05

6.  Isolated face features are sufficient to elicit ultra-rapid and involuntary orienting responses toward faces.

Authors:  Louise Kauffmann; Sarah Khazaz; Carole Peyrin; Nathalie Guyader
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Theta- and Gamma-Band Activity Discriminates Face, Body and Object Perception.

Authors:  Francesco Bossi; Isabella Premoli; Sara Pizzamiglio; Sema Balaban; Paola Ricciardelli; Davide Rivolta
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 3.169

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.