Literature DB >> 25589587

Nasotemporal ERP differences: evidence for increased inhibition of temporal distractors.

Christoph Huber-Huber1, Anna Grubert2, Ulrich Ansorge3, Martin Eimer2.   

Abstract

Previous research has demonstrated behavioral advantages for stimuli in the temporal relative to the nasal visual hemifield. To investigate whether this nasotemporal asymmetry reflects a genuinely attentional bias, we recorded event-related potentials in a task where participants identified a color-defined target digit in one visual hemifield that was accompanied by an irrelevant distractor in the opposite hemifield (experiment 1). To dissociate the processing of stimuli in nasal and temporal visual hemifields, an eye-patching procedure was used. Targets triggered N2pc components that marked their attentional selection. Unexpectedly, these N2pc components were larger and emerged earlier for nasal relative to temporal targets. Experiment 2 provided evidence that this nasotemporal asymmetry for the N2pc is linked to an increased attentional inhibition of temporal distractors. Relative to nasal distractors, temporal distractors elicited an increased inhibition-related contralateral positivity, resulting in more pronounced differences between contralateral and ipsilateral event-related potentials on trials with temporal distractors and nasal targets. These results provide novel evidence for a genuinely attentional contribution to nasotemporal asymmetries and suggest that such asymmetries are associated with top-down controlled distractor inhibition.
Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  N2pc; attention; event-related potentials; inhibition; nasotemporal asymmetry; visual hemifield

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25589587      PMCID: PMC4416602          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00344.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  26 in total

1.  Electrophysiological measurement of rapid shifts of attention during visual search.

Authors:  G F Woodman; S J Luck
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-08-26       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The oculomotor distractor effect in normal and hemianopic vision.

Authors:  R Walker; S Mannan; D Maurer; A L Pambakian; C Kennard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Using the jackknife-based scoring method for measuring LRP onset effects in factorial designs.

Authors:  R Ulrich; J Miller
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Saccade performance in the nasal and temporal hemifields.

Authors:  Omar I Jóhannesson; Arni Gunnar Asgeirsson; Arni Kristjánsson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence.

Authors:  R De Jong; C C Liang; E Lauber
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search.

Authors:  S J Luck; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Retinal ganglion cells that project to the superior colliculus and pretectum in the macaque monkey.

Authors:  V H Perry; A Cowey
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  Retinal ganglion cells that project to the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus in the macaque monkey.

Authors:  V H Perry; R Oehler; A Cowey
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Extrageniculate vision in hemianopic humans: saccade inhibition by signals in the blind field.

Authors:  R Rafal; J Smith; J Krantz; A Cohen; C Brennan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-10-05       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Neural sources of focused attention in visual search.

Authors:  J M Hopf; S J Luck; M Girelli; T Hagner; G R Mangun; H Scheich; H J Heinze
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  2 in total

1.  Naso-Temporal Asymmetries: Suppression of Emotional Faces in the Temporal Visual Hemifield.

Authors:  David Framorando; Mylène Bapst; Nathalie Vuille; Alan J Pegna
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 4.677

2.  A nasal visual field advantage in interocular competition.

Authors:  A Sahakian; C L E Paffen; S Van der Stigchel; S Gayet
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.