Literature DB >> 18492091

Investigating genetic discrimination in Australia: a large-scale survey of clinical genetics clients.

S Taylor1, S Treloar, K Barlow-Stewart, M Stranger, M Otlowski.   

Abstract

We report first results from the Australian Genetic Discrimination Project of clinical genetics services clients' perceptions and experiences regarding alleged differential treatment associated with having genetic information. Adults (n = 2667) who had presented from 1998 to 2003 regarding predictive or presymptomatic testing for designated mature-onset conditions were surveyed; 951/1185 respondents met inclusion criteria for current asymptomatic status. Neurological conditions and familial cancers were primary relevant conditions for 87% of asymptomatic respondents. Specific incidents of alleged negative treatment, reported by 10% (n = 93) of respondents, occurred in life insurance (42%), employment (5%), family (22%), social (11%) and health (20%) domains. Respondents where neuro-degenerative conditions were relevant were more likely overall to report incidents and significantly more likely to report incidents in the social domain. Most incidents in the post-test period occurred in the first year after testing. Only 15% of respondents knew where to complain officially if treated negatively because of genetics issues. Recommendations include the need for increased community and clinical education regarding genetic discrimination, for extended clinical genetics sector engagement and for co-ordinated monitoring, research and policy development at national levels in order for the full benefits of genetic testing technology to be realised.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18492091     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2008.01016.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Genet        ISSN: 0009-9163            Impact factor:   4.438


  24 in total

1.  Unravelling fears of genetic discrimination: an exploratory study of Dutch HCM families in an era of genetic non-discrimination acts.

Authors:  Els Geelen; Klasien Horstman; Carlo L M Marcelis; Pieter A Doevendans; Ine Van Hoyweghen
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Potential stigma associated with inclusion of the psychosis risk syndrome in the DSM-V: an empirical question.

Authors:  Lawrence H Yang; Ahtoy J Wonpat-Borja; Mark G Opler; Cheryl M Corcoran
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2010-04-18       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Stigmatization and male identity: Norwegian males' experience after identification as BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Nina Strømsvik; Målfrid Råheim; Nina Oyen; Lars Fredrik Engebretsen; Eva Gjengedal
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-03-20       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Factors associated with experiences of genetic discrimination among individuals at risk for Huntington disease.

Authors:  Yvonne Bombard; JoAnne Palin; Jan M Friedman; Gerry Veenstra; Susan Creighton; Jane S Paulsen; Joan L Bottorff; Michael R Hayden
Journal:  Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 3.568

5.  A comparative analysis of ethical and professional challenges experienced by Australian and U.S. genetic counselors.

Authors:  Sarah Alliman; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Dianne M Bartels; Fengqin Lian; Carolyn James; Bonnie S LeRoy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Neurodegenerative disease. Genetic discrimination in Huntington disease.

Authors:  Stefan M Pulst
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 42.937

7.  What's at stake? Genetic information from the perspective of people with epilepsy and their family members.

Authors:  Sara Shostak; Dana Zarhin; Ruth Ottman
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Personalised medicine: a critique on the future of health care.

Authors:  Jacqueline Savard
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 1.352

9.  Views of discrimination among individuals confronting genetic disease.

Authors:  Robert Klitzman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  The clinical utility of molecular diagnostic testing for primary immune deficiency disorders: a case based review.

Authors:  Rohan Ameratunga; See-Tarn Woon; Katherine Neas; Donald R Love
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 3.406

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.