Literature DB >> 21184581

Factors associated with experiences of genetic discrimination among individuals at risk for Huntington disease.

Yvonne Bombard1, JoAnne Palin, Jan M Friedman, Gerry Veenstra, Susan Creighton, Jane S Paulsen, Joan L Bottorff, Michael R Hayden.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify factors that are associated with experiencing genetic discrimination (GD) among individuals at risk for Huntington disease (HD). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to examine factors associated with experiencing GD in data from a cross-sectional, self-report survey of 293 individuals at risk for HD. The study sample comprised 167 genetically tested respondents, and 66 who were not tested (80% response rate). Overall, individuals who learn they are at risk for HD at a younger age (OR = 3.1; 95% CI: 1.5-6.2; P = 0.002), are mutation-positive (OR = 2.8; 95% CI: 1.4-6.0; P = 0.006), or are highly educated (OR = 2.7; 95% CI: 1.4-5.1; P = 0.002) are more likely to experience GD, particularly in insurance, family, and social settings. Further, younger age was associated with discrimination in insurance (OR = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.94-1.00; P = 0.038). This study provides evidence that some people who are at risk for HD were more likely to experience GD than others. Individuals who learned they are at risk for HD at a younger age and those who are mutation-positive were more likely to experience GD, particularly in insurance, family, and social settings. Younger individuals were more likely to experience discrimination in the insurance setting. Overall, highly educated individuals were also more likely to report discrimination. These results provide direction for clinical and family discussions, counseling practice, and policy aimed at mitigating experiences of GD.
Copyright © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21184581      PMCID: PMC3860279          DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.b.31130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet        ISSN: 1552-4841            Impact factor:   3.568


  30 in total

1.  Race, socioeconomic status, and perceived discrimination among healthy women.

Authors:  Jennifer M Watson; Isabel C Scarinci; Robert C Klesges; Deborah Slawson; Bettina M Beech
Journal:  J Womens Health Gend Based Med       Date:  2002-06

2.  Genetic discrimination: the clinician perspective.

Authors:  R Nedelcu; K R Blazer; B U Schwerin; P Gambol; P Mantha; G C Uman; J N Weitzel
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.438

3.  Genetic testing and Huntington's disease: issues of employment.

Authors:  Peter S Harper; Sjef Gevers; Guido de Wert; Susan Creighton; Yvonne Bombard; Michael R Hayden
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 44.182

Review 4.  Family communication about genetic risk: the little that is known.

Authors:  Brenda J Wilson; Karen Forrest; Edwin R van Teijlingen; Lorna McKee; Neva Haites; Eric Matthews; Sheila A Simpson
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  2004

5.  Genetic counseling and testing in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Donald W Hadley; Jean Jenkins; Eileen Dimond; Kenneth Nakahara; Liam Grogan; David J Liewehr; Seth M Steinberg; Ilan Kirsch
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2003-03-10

6.  Health insurance and discrimination concerns and BRCA1/2 testing in a clinic population.

Authors:  Emily A Peterson; Kara J Milliron; Karen E Lewis; Susan D Goold; Sofia D Merajver
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Psychological consequences and predictors of adverse events in the first 5 years after predictive testing for Huntington's disease.

Authors:  E W Almqvist; R R Brinkman; S Wiggins; M R Hayden
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.438

8.  To tell or not to tell: barriers and facilitators in family communication about genetic risk.

Authors:  K Forrest; S A Simpson; B J Wilson; E R van Teijlingen; L McKee; N Haites; E Matthews
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.438

9.  A survey of genetic counselors' strategies for addressing ethical and professional challenges in practice.

Authors:  Matthew A Bower; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Dianne M Bartels; Bonnie S LeRoy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Predictive genetic test decisions for Huntington's disease: context, appraisal and new moral imperatives.

Authors:  Sandra D Taylor
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.634

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Genetic testing in psychiatry: a review of attitudes and beliefs.

Authors:  Ryan E Lawrence; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  Psychiatry       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.458

2.  Impact of Huntington Disease Gene-Positive Status on Pre-Symptomatic Young Adults and Recommendations for Genetic Counselors.

Authors:  Ping Gong; Joanna H Fanos; Lauren Korty; Carly E Siskind; Andrea K Hanson-Kahn
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Citizens' perspectives on personalized medicine: a qualitative public deliberation study.

Authors:  Yvonne Bombard; Julia Abelson; Dorina Simeonov; Francois-Pierre Gauvin
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Experiences of predictive testing in young people at risk of Huntington's disease, familial cardiomyopathy or hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Rhona MacLeod; Anna Beach; Sasha Henriques; Jasmin Knopp; Katie Nelson; Lauren Kerzin-Storrar
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 4.246

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.