Literature DB >> 20054623

Views of discrimination among individuals confronting genetic disease.

Robert Klitzman1.   

Abstract

Though the US passed the Genetic Information Non-Discrimination Act, many questions remain of how individuals confronting genetic disease view and experience possible discrimination. We interviewed, for 2 hours each, 64 individuals who had, or were at risk for, Huntington's Disease, breast cancer, or Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency. Discrimination can be implicit, indirect and subtle, rather than explicit, direct and overt; and be hard to prove. Patients may be treated "differently" and unfairly, raising questions of how to define "discrimination", and "appropriate accommodation". Patients were often unclear and wary about legislation. Fears and experiences of discrimination can shape testing, treatment, and disclosure. Discrimination can be subjective, and take various forms. Searches for only objective evidence of it may be inherently difficult. Providers need to be aware of, and prepared to address, subtle and indirect discrimination; ambiguities, confusion and potential limitations concerning current legislation; and needs for education about these laws. Policies are needed to prevent discrimination in life, long-term care, and disability insurance, not covered by GINA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20054623      PMCID: PMC3152486          DOI: 10.1007/s10897-009-9262-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  20 in total

1.  Laws restricting health insurers' use of genetic information: impact on genetic discrimination.

Authors:  M A Hall; S S Rich
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Human genetics. Before it's too late--addressing fear of genetic information.

Authors:  Karen H Rothenberg; Sharon F Terry
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-07-12       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Human genetics. A rational view of insurance and genetic discrimination.

Authors:  William Nowlan
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-07-12       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Genetic discrimination: too few data.

Authors:  Margaret F Otlowski; Sandra D Taylor; Kristine K Barlow-Stewart
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  A scarlet letter or a red herring?

Authors:  William J Nowlan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-01-23       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Genetic discrimination--an overblown fear?

Authors:  Dorothy C Wertz
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 53.242

7.  Discrimination as a consequence of genetic testing.

Authors:  P R Billings; M A Kohn; M de Cuevas; J Beckwith; J S Alper; M R Natowicz
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Is there a pink slip in my gene? Genetic discrimination in the workplace.

Authors:  P S Miller
Journal:  J Health Care Law Policy       Date:  2000

9.  Investigating genetic discrimination in Australia: a large-scale survey of clinical genetics clients.

Authors:  S Taylor; S Treloar; K Barlow-Stewart; M Stranger; M Otlowski
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2008-05-19       Impact factor: 4.438

10.  Genetic discrimination: perspectives of consumers.

Authors:  E V Lapham; C Kozma; J O Weiss
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-10-25       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  27 in total

Review 1.  Global trends on fears and concerns of genetic discrimination: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Annet Wauters; Ine Van Hoyweghen
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.172

2.  "In sickness and in health"? Disclosures of genetic risks in dating.

Authors:  Robert L Klitzman; Meghan M Sweeney
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-10-02       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Use of genetic tests among neurologists and psychiatrists: knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, and needs for training.

Authors:  Melissa Salm; Kristopher Abbate; Paul Appelbaum; Ruth Ottman; Wendy Chung; Karen Marder; Cheng-Shiun Leu; Roy Alcalay; Jill Goldman; Alexander Malik Curtis; Christopher Leech; Katherine Johansen Taber; Robert Klitzman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Investigating Married Adults' Communal Coping with Genetic Health Risk and Perceived Discrimination.

Authors:  Rachel A Smith; Alan Sillars; Ryan P Chesnut; Xun Zhu
Journal:  Commun Monogr       Date:  2017-11-24

Review 5.  Ethical considerations for pharmacogenomic testing in pediatric clinical care and research.

Authors:  Cassandra Moran; Courtney D Thornburg; Raymond C Barfield
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.533

6.  Living with a Rare Health Condition: The Influence of a Support Community and Public Stigma on Communication, Stress, and Available Support.

Authors:  Xun Zhu; Rachel A Smith; Roxanne L Parrott
Journal:  J Appl Commun Res       Date:  2017-03-22

Review 7.  Ethics of genetic and biomarker test disclosures in neurodegenerative disease prevention trials.

Authors:  Scott Y H Kim; Jason Karlawish; Benjamin E Berkman
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 8.  Evolving approaches to the ethical management of genomic data.

Authors:  Jean E McEwen; Joy T Boyer; Kathie Y Sun
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 9.  Genetic research on biospecimens poses minimal risk.

Authors:  David S Wendler; Annette Rid
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 11.639

10.  Alpha-1 couples: interpersonal and intrapersonal predictors of spousal communication and stress.

Authors:  Rachel A Smith; Sara Wienke; Donna L Coffman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-08-11       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.