Literature DB >> 18490807

Determination of optimal electrode positions for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).

Chang-Hwan Im1, Hui-Hun Jung, Jung-Do Choi, Soo Yeol Lee, Ki-Young Jung.   

Abstract

The present study introduces a new approach to determining optimal electrode positions in transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Electric field and 3D conduction current density were analyzed using 3D finite element method (FEM) formulated for a dc conduction problem. The electrode positions for minimal current injection were optimized by changing the Cartesian coordinate system into the spherical coordinate system and applying the (2+6) evolution strategy (ES) algorithm. Preliminary simulation studies applied to a standard three-layer head model demonstrated that the proposed approach is promising in enhancing the performance of tDCS.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18490807     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/11/N03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  19 in total

1.  Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad.

Authors:  Abhishek Datta; Varun Bansal; Julian Diaz; Jinal Patel; Davide Reato; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 8.955

2.  Optimization of focality and direction in dense electrode array transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).

Authors:  Seyhmus Guler; Moritz Dannhauer; Burak Erem; Rob Macleod; Don Tucker; Sergei Turovets; Phan Luu; Deniz Erdogmus; Dana H Brooks
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Regional electric field induced by electroconvulsive therapy in a realistic finite element head model: influence of white matter anisotropic conductivity.

Authors:  Won Hee Lee; Zhi-De Deng; Tae-Seong Kim; Andrew F Laine; Sarah H Lisanby; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Neuroplastic changes following rehabilitative training correlate with regional electrical field induced with tDCS.

Authors:  M A Halko; A Datta; E B Plow; J Scaturro; M Bikson; L B Merabet
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  The point spread function of the human head and its implications for transcranial current stimulation.

Authors:  Jacek P Dmochowski; Marom Bikson; Lucas C Parra
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Enhancement of delay eyelid conditioning by microcurrent electrical stimulation of the medial prefrontal cortex is triggered by the expression of Fos protein in guinea pigs.

Authors:  Ya-Juan Zheng; Yu-Chen Dong; Chao Zhu; Mei-Sheng Zhao
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 2.447

7.  Visualizing simulated electrical fields from electroencephalography and transcranial electric brain stimulation: a comparative evaluation.

Authors:  Sebastian Eichelbaum; Moritz Dannhauer; Mario Hlawitschka; Dana Brooks; Thomas R Knösche; Gerik Scheuermann
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Enhanced locomotor adaptation aftereffect in the "broken escalator" phenomenon using anodal tDCS.

Authors:  D Kaski; S Quadir; M Patel; N Yousif; A M Bronstein
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Target optimization in transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Rosalind J Sadleir; Tracy D Vannorsdall; David J Schretlen; Barry Gordon
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 4.157

10.  Enhancing performance in numerical magnitude processing and mental arithmetic using transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS).

Authors:  Tobias U Hauser; Stephanie Rotzer; Roland H Grabner; Susan Mérillat; Lutz Jäncke
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.