Literature DB >> 21620985

Neuroplastic changes following rehabilitative training correlate with regional electrical field induced with tDCS.

M A Halko1, A Datta, E B Plow, J Scaturro, M Bikson, L B Merabet.   

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has recently emerged as a promising approach to enhance neurorehabilitative outcomes. However, little is known about how the local electrical field generated by tDCS relates to underlying neuroplastic changes and behavior. To address this question, we present a case study analysis of an individual with hemianopia due to stroke and who benefited from a combined visual rehabilitation training and tDCS treatment program. Activation associated with a visual motion perception task (obtained by functional magnetic resonance imaging; fMRI) was used to characterize local changes in brain activity at baseline and after training. Individualized, high-resolution electrical field modeling reproducing precise cerebral and lesioned tissue geometry, predicted distortions of current flow in peri-lesional areas and diffuse clusters of peak electric fields. Using changes in fMRI signal as an index of cortical recovery, correlations to the electrical field map were determined. Significant correlations between the electrical field and change in fMRI signal were region specific including cortical areas under the anode electrode and peri-lesional visual areas. These patterns were consistent with effective tDCS facilitated rehabilitation. We describe the methodology used to analyze tDCS mechanisms through combined fMRI and computational modeling with the ultimate goal of developing a rationale for individualized therapy.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21620985      PMCID: PMC3167218          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  48 in total

1.  General multilevel linear modeling for group analysis in FMRI.

Authors:  Christian F Beckmann; Mark Jenkinson; Stephen M Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Excitability changes induced in the human primary visual cortex by transcranial direct current stimulation: direct electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Andrea Antal; Tamas Z Kincses; Michael A Nitsche; Orsolya Bartfai; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging mirrors recovery of visual perception after repetitive tachistoscopic stimulation in patients with partial cortical blindness.

Authors:  Burkhard Pleger; Ann-Freya Foerster; Walter Widdig; Markus Henschel; Volkmar Nicolas; Andreas Jansen; Andreas Frank; Stefan Knecht; Peter Schwenkreis; Martin Tegenthoff
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2003-01-02       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Computation of electric and magnetic stimulation in human head using the 3-D impedance method.

Authors:  Mohammad Nadeem; Thorleif Thorlin; Om P Gandhi; Mikael Persson
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Multilevel linear modelling for FMRI group analysis using Bayesian inference.

Authors:  Mark W Woolrich; Timothy E J Behrens; Christian F Beckmann; Mark Jenkinson; Stephen M Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Brain polarization in humans: a reappraisal of an old tool for prolonged non-invasive modulation of brain excitability.

Authors:  Alberto Priori
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Recovery following sensorimotor cortical damage: evoked potentials, brain stimulation and motor control.

Authors:  R B Glassman
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1971-10       Impact factor: 5.330

8.  Mechanisms of sustained increases of firing rate of neurons in the rat cerebral cortex after polarization: reverberating circuits or modification of synaptic conductance?

Authors:  I B Gartside
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1968-10-26       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Neural correlates of motor recovery after stroke: a longitudinal fMRI study.

Authors:  N S Ward; M M Brown; A J Thompson; R S J Frackowiak
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2003-08-22       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Manipulation of phosphene thresholds by transcranial direct current stimulation in man.

Authors:  Andrea Antal; Tamás Z Kincses; Michael A Nitsche; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-04-16       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  31 in total

1.  Stimulation targeting higher motor areas in stroke rehabilitation: A proof-of-concept, randomized, double-blinded placebo-controlled study of effectiveness and underlying mechanisms.

Authors:  David A Cunningham; Nicole Varnerin; Andre Machado; Corin Bonnett; Daniel Janini; Sarah Roelle; Kelsey Potter-Baker; Vishwanath Sankarasubramanian; Xiaofeng Wang; Guang Yue; Ela B Plow
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.406

2.  Use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to enhance cognitive training: effect of timing of stimulation.

Authors:  Donel M Martin; Rose Liu; Angelo Alonzo; Melissa Green; Colleen K Loo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Incomplete evidence that increasing current intensity of tDCS boosts outcomes.

Authors:  Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Paola Marangolo; Benjamin M Hampstead; Sven Bestmann; Elisabeth Galletta; Helena Knotkova; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 8.955

4.  Imaging artifacts induced by electrical stimulation during conventional fMRI of the brain.

Authors:  Andrea Antal; Marom Bikson; Abhishek Datta; Belen Lafon; Peter Dechent; Lucas C Parra; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  A critical role of temporoparietal junction in the integration of top-down and bottom-up attentional control.

Authors:  Qiong Wu; Chi-Fu Chang; Sisi Xi; I-Wen Huang; Zuxiang Liu; Chi-Hung Juan; Yanhong Wu; Jin Fan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 6.  High-resolution modeling assisted design of customized and individualized transcranial direct current stimulation protocols.

Authors:  Marom Bikson; Asif Rahman; Abhishek Datta; Felipe Fregni; Lotfi Merabet
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2012-07-10

7.  Individualized tDCS modeling predicts functional connectivity changes within the working memory network in older adults.

Authors:  Aprinda Indahlastari; Alejandro Albizu; Jessica N Kraft; Andrew O'Shea; Nicole R Nissim; Ayden L Dunn; Daniela Carballo; Michael P Gordon; Shreya Taank; Alex T Kahn; Cindy Hernandez; William M Zucker; Adam J Woods
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2021-08-08       Impact factor: 8.955

8.  Remotely Supervised Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Increases the Benefit of At-Home Cognitive Training in Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Leigh Charvet; Michael Shaw; Bryan Dobbs; Ariana Frontario; Kathleen Sherman; Marom Bikson; Abhishek Datta; Lauren Krupp; Esmail Zeinapour; Margaret Kasschau
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2017-02-22

9.  Inter-Individual Variation during Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Normalization of Dose Using MRI-Derived Computational Models.

Authors:  Abhishek Datta; Dennis Truong; Preet Minhas; Lucas C Parra; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 4.157

10.  Transcranial direct-current stimulation increases extracellular dopamine levels in the rat striatum.

Authors:  Tomoko Tanaka; Yuji Takano; Satoshi Tanaka; Naoyuki Hironaka; Kazuto Kobayashi; Takashi Hanakawa; Katsumi Watanabe; Manabu Honda
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.