| Literature DB >> 18489733 |
Anna Cohuet1, Sujatha Krishnakumar, Frédéric Simard, Isabelle Morlais, Anastasios Koutsos, Didier Fontenille, Michael Mindrinos, Fotis C Kafatos.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Anopheles innate immunity affects Plasmodium development and is a potential target of innovative malaria control strategies. The extent and distribution of nucleotide diversity in immunity genes might provide insights into the evolutionary forces that condition pathogen-vector interactions. The discovery of polymorphisms is an essential step towards association studies of susceptibility to infection.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18489733 PMCID: PMC2405807 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-227
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Figure 1Studied genes. A: Proportion of studied genes putatively involved in (1) Recognition, (2) Modulation, (3) Signal transduction and (4) Effectors molecules of immune response and (5) Non imnnune related genes. B: Relative position of studied genes on the Anopheles gambiae genome. Immune related genes are indicated at the right of each chromosome, non immune related genes on the left by using the ENSEMBL ID reduced to the three first letters and five last numbers.
Figure 2Nucleotide diversity. Nucleotide diversity along the chromosomes for A. arabiensis (red line), A. gambiae M form (blue line) and A. gambiae S form (black line). Data from immune related genes and control genes are included. Abscise represents position of the genes along the genome. Chromosomes and centromeres are represented below. The asterisk shows the position of TEP1 gene.
Figure 3Genetic differentiation between populations. Genetic distance between pairs of populations on chromosomes X (A), 2 (B) and 3 (C). Fst estimates are shown in the top part of each graph and the corresponding P-values are shown below, in grey for A. arabiensis/A. gambiae M form comparisons, white for A. arabiensis/A. gambiae S form and in black for A. gambiae M form/A. gambiae S form. Data from immune related genes and control genes are included. Horizontal straight lines represent the significance threshold at P= 0.05, dashed lines: P = 0.05 after correction for multiple tests (Bonferroni sequential procedure). Missing data are indicated with a dot. Negative Fst values that are always not significant were represented as equal to zero. Highly significant P values (<10-4) were represented as P = 0.0001 to be shown on a logarithmic scale.
McDonald and Kreitman test results in immune and non immune related genes
| A: Between | |||
| Non synonymous | Synonymous | Ratios | |
| Interspecific fixed divergences | 36 | 63 | 0.571 |
| Intraspecific polymorphisms | 344 | 905 | 0.380 |
| Ratios | 0.104 | 0.070 | P = 0.081 |
| B: Between | |||
| Non synonymous | Synonymous | Ratios | |
| Interspecific fixed divergences | 24 | 37 | 0.649 |
| Intraspecific polymorphisms | 421 | 1171 | 0.360 |
| Ratios | 0.057 | 0.032 | P = 0.038 |
| C: Between | |||
| Non synonymous | Synonymous | Ratios | |
| Interspecific fixed divergences | 16 | 55 | 0.290 |
| Intraspecific polymorphisms | 151 | 675 | 0.224 |
| Ratios | 0.106 | 0.081 | P = 0.426 |
| D: Between | |||
| Non synonymous | Synonymous | Ratios | |
| Interspecific fixed divergences | 14 | 49 | 0.286 |
| Intraspecific polymorphisms | 192 | 798 | 0.241 |
| Ratios | 0.073 | 0.061 | P = 0.622 |
SNPs were counted for the groups of genes (immune related or non immune related genes) within species (Intraspecific polymorphisms) or between species (Interspecific fixed divergences). The probability (P) is calculated using a 2-tailed Fisher's exact test.