Literature DB >> 9501493

The effective population size of Anopheles gambiae in Kenya: implications for population structure.

T Lehmann1, W A Hawley, H Grebert, F H Collins.   

Abstract

We estimated current and long-term effective population size (Ne) of two Anopheles gambiae (savanna cytotype) populations in Kenya. Temporal variation at nine microsatellite loci in each population sampled 7 and 9 years apart and genetic diversity in each sample were analyzed to answer the following questions. (1) Do bottlenecks occur in Kenyan populations of A. gambiae? (2) How variable are different populations with respect to their current and long-term Ne values? (3) What are the implications of these results on population structure and history? The estimates of Ne of Asembo and Jego were 6,359 and 4,258, respectively, and the lower 95% limits were 2,455 and 1,669, respectively. Thus, despite the typical observation of low density at the village level during the dry season, large populations are maintained annually. Large current Ne is consistent with previous studies showing low differentiation across the continent, especially under Wright's isolation-by-distance model. Current Ne in Asembo was 1.5-fold higher than in Jego, but this difference was not significant. Long-term Ne in Asembo (22,667) was 2.9-fold higher than that in Jego (7,855) based on the stepwise mutation model. The difference between populations was significant at both time points regardless of whether long-term Ne values were calculated based on the stepwise mutation model or the infinite-alleles model. Heterozygosity in Jego declined significantly between 1987 (59%) and 1996 (54%), whereas heterozygosity in Asembo was stable (66%-65%). Despite the relatively high and significant differentiation between Asembo and Jego (FST = 0.072-0.10, RST = 0.037-0.038), all alleles in Jego were found in Asembo but not vice versa. All of these findings suggest that lower Ne in Jego magnifies differentiation between the two populations. The long-term Ne was biased downward, because its calculation was based on an upper bound estimate of microsatellite mutation rate. Ne values based on mtDNA and allozymes were an order of magnitude higher. Long-term Ne therefore, is probably measured in hundreds of thousands and hence does not support a recent expansion of this species from a small population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9501493     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025923

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  52 in total

1.  Using maximum likelihood to estimate population size from temporal changes in allele frequencies.

Authors:  E G Williamson; M Slatkin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Estimation of long-term effective population sizes through the history of durum wheat using microsatellite data.

Authors:  A-C Thuillet; T Bataillon; S Poirier; S Santoni; J L David
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Gene flow-dependent genomic divergence between Anopheles gambiae M and S forms.

Authors:  David Weetman; Craig S Wilding; Keith Steen; João Pinto; Martin J Donnelly
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  Seasonal variation in spatial distributions of Anopheles gambiae in a Sahelian village: evidence for aestivation.

Authors:  Tovi Lehmann; A Dao; A S Yaro; M Diallo; S Timbiné; D L Huestis; A Adamou; Y Kassogué; A I Traoré
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.278

5.  Complexities in the genetic structure of Anopheles gambiae populations in west Africa as revealed by microsatellite DNA analysis.

Authors:  G C Lanzaro; Y T Touré; J Carnahan; L Zheng; G Dolo; S Traoré; V Petrarca; K D Vernick; C E Taylor
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Tsetse flies: genetics, evolution, and role as vectors.

Authors:  E S Krafsur
Journal:  Infect Genet Evol       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 3.342

7.  Field, genetic, and modeling approaches show strong positive selection acting upon an insecticide resistance mutation in Anopheles gambiae s.s.

Authors:  Amy Lynd; David Weetman; Susana Barbosa; Alexander Egyir Yawson; Sara Mitchell; Joao Pinto; Ian Hastings; Martin J Donnelly
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Aestivation of the African malaria mosquito, Anopheles gambiae in the Sahel.

Authors:  Tovi Lehmann; Adama Dao; Alpha Seydou Yaro; Abdoulaye Adamou; Yaya Kassogue; Moussa Diallo; Traoré Sékou; Cecilia Coscaron-Arias
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.345

9.  High, clustered, nucleotide diversity in the genome of Anopheles gambiae revealed through pooled-template sequencing: implications for high-throughput genotyping protocols.

Authors:  Craig S Wilding; David Weetman; Keith Steen; Martin J Donnelly
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Population structure analyses and demographic history of the malaria vector Anopheles albimanus from the Caribbean and the Pacific regions of Colombia.

Authors:  Lina A Gutiérrez; Nelson J Naranjo; Astrid V Cienfuegos; Carlos E Muskus; Shirley Luckhart; Jan E Conn; Margarita M Correa
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 2.979

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.