R F Brown1, C Hill, C J Burant, L A Siminoff. 1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10022, USA. brownr@mskcc.org
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this report is to extend the current understanding of patient satisfaction by examining expectations of a sample of breast cancer patients and concordance with their medical oncologists about the content of consultations and the importance of consultation items. METHODS: Three hundred and ninety-five female early stage breast cancer patients of 56 oncologists participated. Patients and oncologists completed a matched questionnaire measuring (a) met expectations, (b) concordance over content and item importance, and (c) satisfaction. RESULTS: Overall patient satisfaction was extremely high (x=91/100%) although expectations were not met at the stated level desired. Patients and physicians disagreed over what was conveyed and received. Higher overall satisfaction was predicted by levels of met expectations (unstandardized beta=0.69, p=0.008, SE=0.26) and concordance over (a) content (unstandardized beta=1.09, p=0.002, SE=0.34) and (b) importance (unstandardized beta=-0.78, p=0.006, SE 0.28). CONCLUSION: Although patient expectations were not well met and physician-patient discord was high about the content of consultations and the importance of consultation items, patients reported high levels of satisfaction. Expectation fulfillment and levels of concordance predicted satisfaction. (c) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this report is to extend the current understanding of patient satisfaction by examining expectations of a sample of breast cancerpatients and concordance with their medical oncologists about the content of consultations and the importance of consultation items. METHODS: Three hundred and ninety-five female early stage breast cancerpatients of 56 oncologists participated. Patients and oncologists completed a matched questionnaire measuring (a) met expectations, (b) concordance over content and item importance, and (c) satisfaction. RESULTS: Overall patient satisfaction was extremely high (x=91/100%) although expectations were not met at the stated level desired. Patients and physicians disagreed over what was conveyed and received. Higher overall satisfaction was predicted by levels of met expectations (unstandardized beta=0.69, p=0.008, SE=0.26) and concordance over (a) content (unstandardized beta=1.09, p=0.002, SE=0.34) and (b) importance (unstandardized beta=-0.78, p=0.006, SE 0.28). CONCLUSION: Although patient expectations were not well met and physician-patient discord was high about the content of consultations and the importance of consultation items, patients reported high levels of satisfaction. Expectation fulfillment and levels of concordance predicted satisfaction. (c) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Authors: Kerri-Anne R Mitchell; Kelly J Brassil; Serena A Rodriguez; Edward Tsai; Kayo Fujimoto; Kate J Krause; L Aubree Shay; Andrew E Springer Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2020-08-23 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: H Geinitz; B Marten-Mittag; C Schäfer; G Henrich; I Bittner; P Herschbach; A Dinkel; S Sehlen Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2012-02-16 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Andrea L Pusic; Anne F Klassen; Laura Snell; Stefan J Cano; Colleen McCarthy; Amie Scott; Yeliz Cemal; Lisa R Rubin; Peter G Cordeiro Journal: Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 2.217
Authors: William D Figg; Erika K Smith; Douglas K Price; Bevin C English; Paul W Thurman; Seth M Steinberg; Ezekiel Emanuel Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-07-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Wendy W T Lam; Ava Kwong; Dacita Suen; Janice Tsang; Inda Soong; Tze Kok Yau; Winnie Yeo; Joyce Suen; Wing Ming Ho; Ka Yan Wong; Wing Kin Sze; Alice W Y Ng; Richard Fielding Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2018-02-07 Impact factor: 4.430