Literature DB >> 16511899

A decision aid to assist in adjuvant therapy choices for breast cancer.

Laura A Siminoff1, Nahida H Gordon, Paula Silverman, Thomas Budd, Peter M Ravdin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Decision aids are tools that help patients make specific and deliberative choices among options. This study was a group randomized controlled trial of a novel decision aid to help patients with breast cancer make adjuvant therapy (AT) decisions.
METHODS: Fourteen oncology practices (n=58 physicians) were randomized to receive the decision aid or a control pamphlet. Complete data were obtained from 405 patient-oncologist pairs. Eligible patients had stage I-III disease and had completed their primary treatment. The decision aid is a simple to use computer program, titled Adjuvant!, that provides estimates of outcome with and without AT. Graphical representations of outcome are shared with patients. Consultations were audiotaped, patients interviewed, and physicians completed a self-administered survey.
RESULTS: In a multivariable model, the 54 patients (13.3%) who took no AT were more likely to have received the decision aid (p=0.02). A differential effect of the Adjuvant! Decision Guide was noted between node negative and positive patients. It was stated by 86.2% of patients that the decision aid was influential when making their treatment decision. Over 95% of patients reported that the Adjuvant Decision Guide was easy to understand and 75% of physicians believed that it helped them understand their patient's treatment preferences and 81.4% reported the information as useful for themselves.
CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that a decision aid made a difference in the choice of whether or not to take AT. The decision aid allowed patients and physicians to consider the benefits of AT in an easy to understand format. Treatment decisions were more individualized for patients in the intervention than in the control group. The use of the decision aid was acceptable to both patients and physicians.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16511899     DOI: 10.1002/pon.1040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  37 in total

1.  Commentary: "the Lake Wobegon effect, a natural human tendency to overestimate one's capabilities" (Wikipedia).

Authors:  Thomas J Smith
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  Doing palliative care in the oncology office.

Authors:  M Jennifer Cheng; Lauren M King; Erin R Alesi; Thomas J Smith
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 3.  The impact of health information technology on cancer care across the continuum: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Will L Tarver; Nir Menachemi
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Multilevel Influences on Patient-Oncologist Communication about Genomic Test Results: Oncologist Perspectives.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; Kathryn L Taylor; Jonathan Clapp; Jinani Jayasekera; Claudine Isaacs; Deena Mary Atieh Graham; Stuart L Goldberg; Jeanne Mandelblatt
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2018-08-21

5.  Impact of Patient Gender and Race and Physician Communication on Colorectal Cancer Diagnostic Visits in Primary Care.

Authors:  Heather L Rogers; Levent Dumenci; Ronald M Epstein; Laura A Siminoff
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  Estimation and external validation of a new prognostic model for predicting recurrence-free survival for early breast cancer patients in the UK.

Authors:  H E Campbell; A M Gray; A L Harris; A H Briggs; M A Taylor
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 7.  Facilitating healthy coping in patients with diabetes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Carolyn T Thorpe; Lauren E Fahey; Heather Johnson; Maithili Deshpande; Joshua M Thorpe; Edwin B Fisher
Journal:  Diabetes Educ       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 2.140

8.  Long-term health outcomes of a decision aid: data from a randomized trial of adjuvant! In women with localized breast cancer.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Elena B Elkin; Pamela B Peele; Maura Dickler; Laura A Siminoff
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  An investigation into the performance of the Adjuvant! Online prognostic programme in early breast cancer for a cohort of patients in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  H E Campbell; M A Taylor; A L Harris; A M Gray
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Oncologist use of the Adjuvant! model for risk communication: a pilot study examining patient knowledge of 10-year prognosis.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Belkora; Hope S Rugo; Dan H Moore; David W Hutton; Daniel F Chen; Laura J Esserman
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.