Literature DB >> 18484146

Femoral component positioning in hip resurfacing with and without navigation.

Muthu Ganapathi1, Pascal-André Vendittoli, Martin Lavigne, Klaus-Peter Günther.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Early failures after hip resurfacing often are the result of technical errors in placing the femoral component. We asked whether image-free computer navigation decreased the number of outliers compared with the conventional nonnavigated technique. We retrospectively compared 51 consecutive hip resurfacings performed using image-free computer navigation with 88 consecutive hip resurfacings performed without navigation. Patient demographics were similar. There were no differences in the average native femoral neck-shaft angles, planned stem-shaft angles, or postoperative stem-shaft angles. However, when the postoperative stem-shaft angle was compared with the planned stem-shaft angle, there were 33 patients (38%) in the nonnavigated group with a deviation greater than 5 degrees in contrast to none in the navigated group. Notching was present in four patients in the nonnavigated group and none in the navigated group. The average operative time was 111 minutes for the navigated group and 105 minutes for the nonnavigated group. Image-free navigation decreased the number of patients with potentially undesirable implant placements. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18484146      PMCID: PMC2664408          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0299-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  26 in total

1.  Image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to lower variability in coronal alignment.

Authors:  Jan Victor; Davy Hoste
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Randomized control trial comparing radiographic total knee arthroplasty implant placement using computer navigation versus conventional technique.

Authors:  Pak Lin Chin; Kuang Ying Yang; Seng Jin Yeo; Ngai Nung Lo
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Computer-assisted navigation increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Rolf G Haaker; Martin Stockheim; Michael Kamp; Gunnar Proff; Johannes Breitenfelder; Andreas Ottersbach
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Computer navigation versus standard instrumentation for TKA: a single-surgeon experience.

Authors:  Michael Bolognesi; Aaron Hofmann
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Removal of acetabular bone in resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip.

Authors:  P A Vendittoli; M Lavigne; A G Roy; J Girard
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-06

6.  Improved implantation technique for resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip.

Authors:  Carl Joachim Wirth; Frank Gossé
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.154

7.  Conventional versus resurfacing total hip arthroplasty. A long-term prospective study of concomitant bilateral implantation of prostheses.

Authors:  M A Ritter; T J Gioe
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Femoral neck fractures following Birmingham hip resurfacing: a national review of 50 cases.

Authors:  A J Shimmin; D Back
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-04

9.  Wagner resurfacing hip arthroplasty. The results of one hundred consecutive arthroplasties after eight to ten years.

Authors:  D W Howie; D Campbell; M McGee; B L Cornish
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  A study of implant failure in the Wagner resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  R S Bell; J Schatzker; V L Fornasier; S B Goodman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  13 in total

1.  [Durom™ hip resurfacing. Short- to midterm clinical and radiological outcome].

Authors:  J Goronzy; M Stiehler; S Kirschner; K-P Günther
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  [Imageless computer navigation of hip resurfacing arthroplasty].

Authors:  Christoph Schnurr; Jochen Nessler; Jürgen Koebke; Joern William Michael; Peer Eysel; Dietmar Pierre König
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.154

3.  A simple technique for alignment in total hip resurfacing arthroplasty: technical note and preliminary report.

Authors:  Manuel Villanueva-Martínez; Antonio Ríos-Luna; Angel Villamor-Pérez
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2009-06-09

4.  Component alignment in hip resurfacing using computer navigation.

Authors:  Chris Bailey; Rehan Gul; Mark Falworth; Steven Zadow; Roger Oakeshott
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Radiological validation of a fluoroscopic guided technique for femoral implant positioning during hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Philippe Chiron; Régis Pailhé; Nicolas Reina; David Ancelin; Akash Sharma; Laurent Maubisson; Jean-Michel Laffosse
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Avoiding short-term femoral neck fracture with imageless computer navigation for hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Michael Olsen; Emil H Schemitsch
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  The First SICOT Oral Presentation Award 2011: imageless computer-assisted femoral component positioning in hip resurfacing: a prospective randomised trial.

Authors:  Maik Stiehler; Jens Goronzy; Albrecht Hartmann; Frank Krummenauer; Klaus-Peter Günther
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Femoral component positioning in hip resurfacing with and without navigation.

Authors:  Andrea Emilio Salvi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  Computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery and robotic surgery in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Nobuhiko Sugano
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2013-02-20

10.  Computer navigation experience in hip resurfacing improves femoral component alignment using a conventional jig.

Authors:  Zachary Morison; Akshay Mehra; Michael Olsen; Michael Donnelly; Emil Schemitsch
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.