Literature DB >> 18483188

Evaluation of 4 multisection CT systems in postoperative imaging of a cochlear implant: a human cadaver and phantom study.

B M Verbist1, R M S Joemai, W M Teeuwisse, W J H Veldkamp, J Geleijns, J H M Frijns.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Postoperative imaging of cochlear implants (CIs) needs to provide detailed information on localization of the electrode array. We evaluated visualization of a HiFocus1J array and accuracy of measurements of electrode positions for acquisitions with 64-section CT scanners of 4 major CT systems (Toshiba Aquilion-64, Philips Brilliance-64, GE LightSpeed-64, and Siemens Sensation-64).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: An implanted human cadaver temporal bone, a polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) phantom containing a CI, and a point spread function (PSF) phantom were scanned. In the human cadaver temporal bone, the visibility of cochlear structures and electrode array were assessed by using a visual analog scale (VAS). Statistical analysis was performed with a paired 2-tailed Student t test with significant level set to .008 after Bonferroni correction. Distinction of individual electrode contacts was quantitatively evaluated. Quantitative assessment of electrode contact positions was achieved with the PMMA phantom by measurement of the displacement. In addition, PSF was measured to evaluate spatial resolution performance of the CT scanners.
RESULTS: VAS scores were significantly lower for Brilliance-64 and LightSpeed-64 compared with Aquilion-64 and Sensation-64. Displacement of electrode contacts ranged from 0.05 to 0.14 mm on Aquilion-64, 0.07 to 0.16 mm on Brilliance-64, 0.07 to 0.61 mm on LightSpeed-64, and 0.03 to 0.13 mm on Sensation-64. PSF measurements show an in-plane and longitudinal resolution varying from 0.48 to 0.68 mm and 0.70 to 0.98 mm, respectively, over the 4 scanners.
CONCLUSION: According to PSF results, electrode contacts of the studied CI can be visualized separately on all of the studied scanners unless curvature causes intercontact spacing narrowing. Assessment of visibility of CI and electrode contact positions, however, varies between scanners.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18483188      PMCID: PMC8119140          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  12 in total

1.  Cochlear view: postoperative radiography for cochlear implantation.

Authors:  J Xu; S A Xu; L T Cohen; G M Clark
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  2000-01

2.  Nondestructive three-dimensional analysis of electrode to modiolus proximity.

Authors:  Hartmut W Husstedt; Antje Aschendorff; Bernhard Richter; Roland Laszig; Martin Schumacher
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Cochlear implants: three-dimensional localization by means of coregistration of CT and conventional radiographs.

Authors:  B R Whiting; K T Bae; M W Skinner
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Double array cochlear implant: CT findings.

Authors:  Federico Cesarini; Monica Gallizioli; Paolo Solero; Marco Rolando; Maria Carla Cassinis; Giovanni Gandini
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 5.  Cochlear implant failure: imaging evaluation of the electrode course.

Authors:  R Jain; S K Mukherji
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.350

6.  Complication of cochlear implantation surgery.

Authors:  Michael A Mecca; William Wagle; Allison Lupinetti; Steven Parnes
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Multisection CT as a valuable tool in the postoperative assessment of cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  Berit M Verbist; Johan H M Frijns; Jakob Geleijns; Mark A van Buchem
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Clinical evaluation of the Clarion CII HiFocus 1 with and without positioner.

Authors:  F B van der Beek; P P B M Boermans; B M Verbist; J J Briaire; J H M Frijns
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Intracochlear misdirected implantation of a cochlear implant.

Authors:  R A Tange; W Grolman; A Maat
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.494

10.  Depth and quality of electrode insertion: a radiologic and pitch scaling assessment of two cochlear implant systems.

Authors:  J M Chen; R Farb; L Hanusaik; D Shipp; J M Nedzelski
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1999-03
View more
  5 in total

1.  Standardization of CT depiction of cochlear implant insertion depth.

Authors:  C C Colby; N W Todd; H R Harnsberger; P A Hudgins
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Consensus panel on a cochlear coordinate system applicable in histologic, physiologic, and radiologic studies of the human cochlea.

Authors:  Berit M Verbist; Margaret W Skinner; Lawrence T Cohen; Patricia A Leake; Chris James; Colette Boëx; Timothy A Holden; Charles C Finley; Peter S Roland; J Thomas Roland; Matt Haller; Jim F Patrick; Claude N Jolly; Mike A Faltys; Jeroen J Briaire; Johan H M Frijns
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Cone-beam CT versus Multidetector CT in Postoperative Cochlear Implant Imaging: Evaluation of Image Quality and Radiation Dose.

Authors:  R A Helal; R Jacob; M A Elshinnawy; A I Othman; I M Al-Dhamari; D W Paulus; T T Abdelaziz
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Pitch comparisons between electrical stimulation of a cochlear implant and acoustic stimuli presented to a normal-hearing contralateral ear.

Authors:  Robert P Carlyon; Olivier Macherey; Johan H M Frijns; Patrick R Axon; Randy K Kalkman; Patrick Boyle; David M Baguley; John Briggs; John M Deeks; Jeroen J Briaire; Xavier Barreau; René Dauman
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-06-05

5.  Pre-, per- and postoperative factors affecting performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants: a new conceptual model over time.

Authors:  Diane S Lazard; Christophe Vincent; Frédéric Venail; Paul Van de Heyning; Eric Truy; Olivier Sterkers; Piotr H Skarzynski; Henryk Skarzynski; Karen Schauwers; Stephen O'Leary; Deborah Mawman; Bert Maat; Andrea Kleine-Punte; Alexander M Huber; Kevin Green; Paul J Govaerts; Bernard Fraysse; Richard Dowell; Norbert Dillier; Elaine Burke; Andy Beynon; François Bergeron; Deniz Başkent; Françoise Artières; Peter J Blamey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.