Literature DB >> 18471629

Optical performance of monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses in the human eye.

Dolores Ortiz1, Jorge L Alió, Gonzalo Bernabéu, Vanessa Pongo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To study the optical performance of intraocular lenses (IOLs) in the human eye to ascertain how multifocality affects the optical performance of refractive and diffractive technologies and the relationship to pupil size.
SETTING: Vissum-Instituto de Oftalmológico de Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
METHODS: Ten eyes each received the monofocal AcrySof MA60 IOL (Alcon) or 1 of the following multifocal pupil-dependent IOLs: diffractive AcrySof ReSTOR (Alcon) or refractive ReZoom (Advanced Medical Optics). The intraocular optical quality in vivo with 3.0 mm and 5.0 mm pupils was characterized by comparing the means of the difference between the total and corneal optical aberrations 3 months postoperatively. The main outcomes measures were total, higher-order, spherical, and coma aberrations (root-mean-square values); modulation transfer function values; point-spread function; and the Strehl ratio.
RESULTS: The ReZoom group had higher in vivo intraocular aberrations than the AcrySof ReSTOR and AcrySof MA60 groups (P = .022). The difference in spherical aberration between the AcrySof ReSTOR and ReZoom groups was statistically significant with 5.0 mm pupils (P = .003) and 3.0 mm pupils (P = .001). The AcrySof ReSTOR group had statistically significant lower coma aberration values with a 5.0 mm pupil (P = .012); there were no differences between IOLs with a 3.0 mm pupil (P = .185).
CONCLUSIONS: Multifocal refractive IOLs resulted in higher intraocular aberrations. The hybrid refractive-diffractive IOL was the least affected by pupil diameter in terms of intraocular aberrations and showed significantly less increase in optical aberrations when the pupil was enlarged.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18471629     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.12.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  13 in total

1.  Internal spherical aberration by ray tracing-type aberrometry in multifocal pseudophakic eyes.

Authors:  I Jun; Y J Choi; E K Kim; K Y Seo; T-I Kim
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Objective evaluation of through-focus optical performance of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses using an optical bench system.

Authors:  Myoung Joon Kim; Len Zheleznyak; Scott Macrae; Hungwon Tchah; Geunyoung Yoon
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.351

3.  Comparison of through-focus image quality across five presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).

Authors:  Jay S Pepose; Daozhi Wang; Griffith E Altmann
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2011-12

Review 4.  Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction.

Authors:  Samantha R de Silva; Jennifer R Evans; Varo Kirthi; Mohammed Ziaei; Martin Leyland
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-12-12

5.  Wavefront analysis and modulation transfer function of three multifocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Marcony R Santhiago; Marcelo V Netto; Jackson Barreto; Beatriz A F Gomes; Arthur Schaefer; Newton Kara-Junior
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.848

6.  Dissatisfaction after multifocal intraocular lens implantation.

Authors:  Maria A Woodward; J Bradley Randleman; R Doyle Stulting
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.351

7.  Surgical management of presbyopia.

Authors:  André Am Torricelli; Jackson B Junior; Marcony R Santhiago; Samir J Bechara
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-09-06

8.  Evaluation of optical quality parameters and ocular aberrations in multifocal intraocular lens implanted eyes.

Authors:  Hun Lee; Kwanghyun Lee; Ji Min Ahn; Eung Kweon Kim; Bradford Sgrignoli; Tae-im Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.759

9.  Assessment of Optical Quality at Different Contrast Levels in Pseudophakic Eyes.

Authors:  Chang Won Park; Hyojin Kim; Choun-Ki Joo
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 1.909

10.  A contralateral eye study comparing apodized diffractive and full diffractive lenses: wavefront analysis and distance and near uncorrected visual acuity.

Authors:  Marcony Rodrigues de Santhiago; Marcelo Vieira Netto; Jackson Barreto; Beatriz de Abreu Fiuza Gomes; Arthur Schaefer; Newton Kara-Junior
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.365

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.