Literature DB >> 18468821

Alternative pulse shapes in electrical hearing.

Astrid van Wieringen1, Olivier Macherey, Robert P Carlyon, John M Deeks, Jan Wouters.   

Abstract

Cochlear implants (CIs) stimulate the auditory nerve with trains of symmetric biphasic (BI) pulses. We review studies showing that more efficient stimulation can be achieved by modifying these pulses by (1) increasing the inter-phase gap (IPG) between the two phases of each pulse, thereby delaying the recovery of charge, (2) increasing the duration and decreasing the amplitude of one phase - so-called "pseudomonophasic (PS)" waveforms, and (3) combining the pseudomonophasic stimulus with an IPG in a "delayed pseudomonophasic" waveform (PS_IPG). These efficiency gains, measured using changes in threshold and loudness, occur at a wide range of pulse rates, including those commonly used in current CI systems. In monopolar mode, dynamic ranges are larger for PS and for long-IPG pulse shapes than for BI pulses, but this increase in DR is not accompanied by a higher number of discriminable loudness steps, and hence, in a better coding of loudness. Moreover, waveforms with relatively short and long interphase gaps do not yield different patterns of excitation despite the relatively large differences in threshold. Two important findings are that, contrary to data obtained in animal experiments, anodic currents are more effective than cathodic stimulation for human CI patients and that the thresholds decrease with increases in IPG over a much longer time course (more than 3 ms) than for animals. In this review it is discussed how these alternative pulse shapes may be beneficial in terms of reducing power consumption and channel interactions, which issues remain to be addressed, and how models contribute to guiding our research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18468821     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2008.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  18 in total

1.  Penetrating electrode stimulation of the rabbit optic nerve: parameters and effects on evoked cortical potentials.

Authors:  Jingjing Sun; Yao Chen; Xinyu Chai; Qiushi Ren; Liming Li
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Intensity coding in electric hearing: effects of electrode configurations and stimulation waveforms.

Authors:  Tiffany Elise H Chua; Mark Bachman; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Multimodal, longitudinal assessment of intracortical microstimulation.

Authors:  Andrew Koivuniemi; Seth J Wilks; Andrew J Woolley; Kevin J Otto
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.453

4.  Effects of biphasic current pulse frequency, amplitude, duration, and interphase gap on eye movement responses to prosthetic electrical stimulation of the vestibular nerve.

Authors:  Natan S Davidovics; Gene Y Fridman; Bryce Chiang; Charles C Della Santina
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 3.802

5.  Polarity Sensitivity as a Potential Correlate of Neural Degeneration in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Quentin Mesnildrey; Frédéric Venail; Robert P Carlyon; Olivier Macherey
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-02-04

6.  Asymmetric versus symmetric pulses for cortical microstimulation.

Authors:  Andrew S Koivuniemi; Kevin J Otto
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 3.802

7.  Extending the limits of place and temporal pitch perception in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Olivier Macherey; John M Deeks; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-11-30

8.  A Phenomenological Model of the Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve Fiber: Temporal and Biphasic Response Properties.

Authors:  Colin D F Horne; Christian J Sumner; Bernhard U Seeber
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 2.380

9.  The Duration of Motor Responses Evoked with Intracortical Microstimulation in Rats Is Primarily Modulated by Stimulus Amplitude and Train Duration.

Authors:  Meghan Watson; Mohamad Sawan; Numa Dancause
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Forward-masking patterns produced by symmetric and asymmetric pulse shapes in electric hearing.

Authors:  Olivier Macherey; Astrid van Wieringen; Robert P Carlyon; Ingeborg Dhooge; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.