Literature DB >> 18468765

Do N1/MMN, P3a, and RON form a strongly coupled chain reflecting the three stages of auditory distraction?

János Horváth1, István Winkler, Alexandra Bendixen.   

Abstract

Distraction triggered by unexpected events is generally described in a serial model comprising (1) automatic detection of unexpected task-irrelevant events, (2) orienting towards the event, and (3) recovery from distraction. Processes taking place at the three stages are assumed to be reflected by the N1 and mismatch negativity (MMN); the P3a; and the reorienting negativity (RON) event-related potentials (ERPs), respectively. We investigated whether the processes indexed by these components form a strongly coupled chain, each co-varying with the preceding one. To this end, micro-sequence analysis of the ERPs elicited by unpredictable pitch-changes was conducted in an auditory duration discrimination task. Results indicated that the processes indexed by the above-mentioned ERPs are not strongly coupled. Pair-wise dissociations were found between the ERPs reflecting each processing stage: P3a can be elicited without concurrent N1-increase or MMN elicitation and without subsequent elicitation of the RON. Possible interpretations of P3a and RON are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18468765     DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychol        ISSN: 0301-0511            Impact factor:   3.251


  68 in total

Review 1.  The cognitive determinants of behavioral distraction by deviant auditory stimuli: a review.

Authors:  Fabrice B R Parmentier
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-12-21

2.  Sensory ERP effects in auditory distraction: did we miss the main event?

Authors:  János Horváth
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-08-04

3.  Preparation interval and cue utilization in the prevention of distraction.

Authors:  János Horváth
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-08-24       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Converging evidence for [coronal] underspecification in English-speaking adults.

Authors:  Alycia Cummings; John Madden; Kathryn Hefta
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 1.710

5.  Electrophysiological evidence for age effects on sensory memory processing of tonal patterns.

Authors:  Johanna Rimmele; Elyse Sussman; Christian Keitel; Thomas Jacobsen; Erich Schröger
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2011-08-08

6.  Cerebellum, temporal predictability and the updating of a mental model.

Authors:  Sonja A Kotz; Anika Stockert; Michael Schwartze
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Automatic sensory information processing abnormalities across the illness course of schizophrenia.

Authors:  C Jahshan; K S Cadenhead; A J Rissling; K Kirihara; D L Braff; G A Light
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2011-07-11       Impact factor: 7.723

8.  Neurophysiological biomarkers informing the clinical neuroscience of schizophrenia: mismatch negativity and prepulse inhibition of startle.

Authors:  Gregory A Light; Neal R Swerdlow
Journal:  Curr Top Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014

9.  Aging increases distraction by auditory oddballs in visual, but not auditory tasks.

Authors:  Alicia Leiva; Fabrice B R Parmentier; Pilar Andrés
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-05-23

10.  Effects of explicit knowledge and predictability on auditory distraction and target performance.

Authors:  Caroline Max; Andreas Widmann; Erich Schröger; Elyse Sussman
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 2.997

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.