Literature DB >> 18448704

Two strategies for gene regulation by promoter nucleosomes.

Itay Tirosh1, Naama Barkai.   

Abstract

Chromatin structure is central for the regulation of gene expression, but its genome-wide organization is only beginning to be understood. Here, we examine the connection between patterns of nucleosome occupancy and the capacity to modulate gene expression upon changing conditions, i.e., transcriptional plasticity. By analyzing genome-wide data of nucleosome positioning in yeast, we find that the presence of nucleosomes close to the transcription start site is associated with high transcriptional plasticity, while nucleosomes at more distant upstream positions are negatively correlated with transcriptional plasticity. Based on this, we identify two typical promoter structures associated with low or high plasticity, respectively. The first class is characterized by a relatively large nucleosome-free region close to the start site coupled with well-positioned nucleosomes further upstream, whereas the second class displays a more evenly distributed and dynamic nucleosome positioning, with high occupancy close to the start site. The two classes are further distinguished by multiple promoter features, including histone turnover, binding site locations, H2A.Z occupancy, expression noise, and expression diversity. Analysis of nucleosome positioning in human promoters reproduces the main observations. Our results suggest two distinct strategies for gene regulation by chromatin, which are selectively employed by different genes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18448704      PMCID: PMC2493397          DOI: 10.1101/gr.076059.108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  45 in total

1.  A genomic code for nucleosome positioning.

Authors:  Eran Segal; Yvonne Fondufe-Mittendorf; Lingyi Chen; AnnChristine Thåström; Yair Field; Irene K Moore; Ji-Ping Z Wang; Jonathan Widom
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-07-19       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Phenotypic consequences of promoter-mediated transcriptional noise.

Authors:  William J Blake; Gábor Balázsi; Michael A Kohanski; Farren J Isaacs; Kevin F Murphy; Yina Kuang; Charles R Cantor; David R Walt; James J Collins
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2006-12-28       Impact factor: 17.970

3.  The Connectivity Map: using gene-expression signatures to connect small molecules, genes, and disease.

Authors:  Justin Lamb; Emily D Crawford; David Peck; Joshua W Modell; Irene C Blat; Matthew J Wrobel; Jim Lerner; Jean-Philippe Brunet; Aravind Subramanian; Kenneth N Ross; Michael Reich; Haley Hieronymus; Guo Wei; Scott A Armstrong; Stephen J Haggarty; Paul A Clemons; Ru Wei; Steven A Carr; Eric S Lander; Todd R Golub
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  A chromatin-mediated mechanism for specification of conditional transcription factor targets.

Authors:  Michael J Buck; Jason D Lieb
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-11-12       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Whole-genome comparison of Leu3 binding in vitro and in vivo reveals the importance of nucleosome occupancy in target site selection.

Authors:  Xiao Liu; Cheol-Koo Lee; Joshua A Granek; Neil D Clarke; Jason D Lieb
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Quantitative analysis of in vivo initiator selection by yeast RNA polymerase II supports a scanning model.

Authors:  Jason N Kuehner; David A Brow
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Identifying regulatory mechanisms using individual variation reveals key role for chromatin modification.

Authors:  Su-In Lee; Dana Pe'er; Aimée M Dudley; George M Church; Daphne Koller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Nucleosome positions predicted through comparative genomics.

Authors:  Ilya P Ioshikhes; Istvan Albert; Sara J Zanton; B Franklin Pugh
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-09-10       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Single-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise.

Authors:  John R S Newman; Sina Ghaemmaghami; Jan Ihmels; David K Breslow; Matthew Noble; Joseph L DeRisi; Jonathan S Weissman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-05-14       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Cell cycle-specified fluctuation of nucleosome occupancy at gene promoters.

Authors:  Gregory J Hogan; Cheol-Koo Lee; Jason D Lieb
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  221 in total

1.  A genomic model of condition-specific nucleosome behavior explains transcriptional activity in yeast.

Authors:  Judith B Zaugg; Nicholas M Luscombe
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 2.  Coupling polymerase pausing and chromatin landscapes for precise regulation of transcription.

Authors:  Daniel A Gilchrist; Karen Adelman
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2012-03-02

Review 3.  Error prevention and mitigation as forces in the evolution of genes and genomes.

Authors:  Tobias Warnecke; Laurence D Hurst
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 4.  Transcription goes digital.

Authors:  Timothée Lionnet; Robert H Singer
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 8.807

5.  Distinct role of Mediator tail module in regulation of SAGA-dependent, TATA-containing genes in yeast.

Authors:  Suraiya A Ansari; Mythily Ganapathi; Joris J Benschop; Frank C P Holstege; Joseph T Wade; Randall H Morse
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Nonspecific protein-DNA binding is widespread in the yeast genome.

Authors:  Ariel Afek; David B Lukatsky
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Identification and characterization of putative methylation targets in the MAOA locus using bioinformatic approaches.

Authors:  Elena Shumay; Joanna S Fowler
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 4.528

8.  Changes in selective effects over time facilitate turnover of enhancer sequences.

Authors:  Kevin Bullaughey
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  High nucleosome occupancy is encoded at X-linked gene promoters in C. elegans.

Authors:  Sevinç Ercan; Yaniv Lubling; Eran Segal; Jason D Lieb
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Subnucleosomal structures and nucleosome asymmetry across a genome.

Authors:  Ho Sung Rhee; Alain R Bataille; Liye Zhang; B Franklin Pugh
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 41.582

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.