Literature DB >> 17053089

Whole-genome comparison of Leu3 binding in vitro and in vivo reveals the importance of nucleosome occupancy in target site selection.

Xiao Liu1, Cheol-Koo Lee, Joshua A Granek, Neil D Clarke, Jason D Lieb.   

Abstract

Sequence motifs that are potentially recognized by DNA-binding proteins occur far more often in genomic DNA than do observed in vivo protein-DNA interactions. To determine how chromatin influences the utilization of particular DNA-binding sites, we compared the in vivo genome-wide binding location of the yeast transcription factor Leu3 to the binding location observed on the same genomic DNA in the absence of any protein cofactors. We found that the DNA-sequence motif recognized by Leu3 in vitro and in vivo was functionally indistinguishable, but Leu3 bound different genomic locations under the two conditions. Accounting for nucleosome occupancy in addition to DNA-sequence motifs significantly improved the prediction of protein-DNA interactions in vivo, but not the prediction of sites bound by purified Leu3 in vitro. Use of histone modification data does not further improve binding predictions, presumably because their effect is already manifest in the global histone distribution. Measurements of nucleosome occupancy in strains that differ in Leu3 genotype show that low nucleosome occupancy at loci bound by Leu3 is not a consequence of Leu3 binding. These results permit quantitation of the epigenetic influence that chromatin exerts on DNA binding-site selection, and provide evidence for an instructive, functionally important role for nucleosome occupancy in determining patterns of regulatory factor targeting genome-wide.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17053089      PMCID: PMC1665635          DOI: 10.1101/gr.5655606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  34 in total

1.  Genome-wide location and function of DNA binding proteins.

Authors:  B Ren; F Robert; J J Wyrick; O Aparicio; E G Jennings; I Simon; J Zeitlinger; J Schreiber; N Hannett; E Kanin; T L Volkert; C J Wilson; S P Bell; R A Young
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-12-22       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Rationalization of gene regulation by a eukaryotic transcription factor: calculation of regulatory region occupancy from predicted binding affinities.

Authors:  Xiao Liu; Neil D Clarke
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-10-11       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  DIP-chip: rapid and accurate determination of DNA-binding specificity.

Authors:  Xiao Liu; David M Noll; Jason D Lieb; Neil D Clarke
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-02-14       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 4.  The dynamics of chromatin remodeling at promoters.

Authors:  Jane Mellor
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2005-07-22       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  Genome-scale identification of nucleosome positions in S. cerevisiae.

Authors:  Guo-Cheng Yuan; Yuen-Jong Liu; Michael F Dion; Michael D Slack; Lani F Wu; Steven J Altschuler; Oliver J Rando
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-06-16       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Yeast transcriptional regulator Leu3p. Self-masking, specificity of masking, and evidence for regulation by the intracellular level of Leu3p.

Authors:  D Wang; F Zheng; S Holmberg; G B Kohlhaw
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1999-07-02       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  LEU3 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae activates multiple genes for branched-chain amino acid biosynthesis by binding to a common decanucleotide core sequence.

Authors:  P Friden; P Schimmel
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Preferential accessibility of the yeast his3 promoter is determined by a general property of the DNA sequence, not by specific elements.

Authors:  X Mai; S Chou; K Struhl
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Detection of leucine-independent DNA site occupancy of the yeast Leu3p transcriptional activator in vivo.

Authors:  C R Kirkpatrick; P Schimmel
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Variant histone H2A.Z is globally localized to the promoters of inactive yeast genes and regulates nucleosome positioning.

Authors:  Benoît Guillemette; Alain R Bataille; Nicolas Gévry; Maryse Adam; Mathieu Blanchette; François Robert; Luc Gaudreau
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2005-11-01       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  82 in total

1.  Manipulating nucleosome disfavoring sequences allows fine-tune regulation of gene expression in yeast.

Authors:  Tali Raveh-Sadka; Michal Levo; Uri Shabi; Boaz Shany; Leeat Keren; Maya Lotan-Pompan; Danny Zeevi; Eilon Sharon; Adina Weinberger; Eran Segal
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2012-05-27       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 2.  C. elegans dosage compensation: a window into mechanisms of domain-scale gene regulation.

Authors:  Sevinc Ercan; Jason D Lieb
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  Differential cofactor requirements for histone eviction from two nucleosomes at the yeast PHO84 promoter are determined by intrinsic nucleosome stability.

Authors:  Christian J Wippo; Bojana Silic Krstulovic; Franziska Ertel; Sanja Musladin; Dorothea Blaschke; Sabrina Stürzl; Guo-Cheng Yuan; Wolfram Hörz; Philipp Korber; Slobodan Barbaric
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2009-03-23       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Program specificity for Ptf1a in pancreas versus neural tube development correlates with distinct collaborating cofactors and chromatin accessibility.

Authors:  David M Meredith; Mark D Borromeo; Tye G Deering; Bradford H Casey; Trisha K Savage; Paul R Mayer; Chinh Hoang; Kuang-Chi Tung; Manonmani Kumar; Chengcheng Shen; Galvin H Swift; Raymond J Macdonald; Jane E Johnson
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Distinguishing direct versus indirect transcription factor-DNA interactions.

Authors:  Raluca Gordân; Alexander J Hartemink; Martha L Bulyk
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Two strategies for gene regulation by promoter nucleosomes.

Authors:  Itay Tirosh; Naama Barkai
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 7.  Nucleosome positioning in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  An Jansen; Kevin J Verstrepen
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 11.056

8.  Calling Cards enable multiplexed identification of the genomic targets of DNA-binding proteins.

Authors:  Haoyi Wang; David Mayhew; Xuhua Chen; Mark Johnston; Robi David Mitra
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Iron regulation through the back door: iron-dependent metabolite levels contribute to transcriptional adaptation to iron deprivation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Jessica Ihrig; Anja Hausmann; Anika Hain; Nadine Richter; Iqbal Hamza; Roland Lill; Ulrich Mühlenhoff
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2009-12-11

10.  High-throughput chromatin information enables accurate tissue-specific prediction of transcription factor binding sites.

Authors:  Tom Whitington; Andrew C Perkins; Timothy L Bailey
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.