Literature DB >> 21930892

A genomic model of condition-specific nucleosome behavior explains transcriptional activity in yeast.

Judith B Zaugg1, Nicholas M Luscombe.   

Abstract

Nucleosomes play an important role in gene regulation. Molecular studies observed that nucleosome binding in promoters tends to be repressive. In contrast, genomic studies have delivered conflicting results: An analysis of yeast grown on diverse carbon sources reported that nucleosome occupancies remain largely unchanged between conditions, whereas a study of the heat-shock response suggested that nucleosomes get evicted at promoters of genes with increased expression. Consequently, there are few general principles that capture the relationship between chromatin organization and transcriptional regulation. Here, we present a qualitative model for nucleosome positioning in Saccharomyces cerevisiae that helps explain important properties of gene expression. By integrating publicly available data sets, we observe that promoter-bound nucleosomes assume one of four discrete configurations that determine the active and silent transcriptional states of a gene, but not its expression level. In TATA-box-containing promoters, nucleosome architecture indicates the amount of transcriptional noise. We show that >20% of genes switch promoter states upon changes in cellular conditions. The data suggest that DNA-binding transcription factors together with chromatin-remodeling enzymes are primarily responsible for the nucleosome architecture. Our model for promoter nucleosome architecture reconciles genome-scale findings with molecular studies; in doing so, we establish principles for nucleosome positioning and gene expression that apply not only to individual genes, but across the entire genome. The study provides a stepping stone for future models of transcriptional regulation that encompass the intricate interplay between cis- and trans-acting factors, chromatin, and the core transcriptional machinery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21930892      PMCID: PMC3246209          DOI: 10.1101/gr.124099.111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  43 in total

Review 1.  Noise in gene expression: origins, consequences, and control.

Authors:  Jonathan M Raser; Erin K O'Shea
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-09-23       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Transcriptional activators are dispensable for transcription in the absence of Spt6-mediated chromatin reassembly of promoter regions.

Authors:  Melissa W Adkins; Jessica K Tyler
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 17.970

3.  Genome-scale identification of nucleosome positions in S. cerevisiae.

Authors:  Guo-Cheng Yuan; Yuen-Jong Liu; Michael F Dion; Michael D Slack; Lani F Wu; Steven J Altschuler; Oliver J Rando
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-06-16       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Stochastic kinetic analysis of developmental pathway bifurcation in phage lambda-infected Escherichia coli cells.

Authors:  A Arkin; J Ross; H H McAdams
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Transcription reinitiation rate: a potential role for TATA box stabilization of the TFIID:TFIIA:DNA complex.

Authors:  D Yean; J D Gralla
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1999-02-01       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Single-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise.

Authors:  John R S Newman; Sina Ghaemmaghami; Jan Ihmels; David K Breslow; Matthew Noble; Joseph L DeRisi; Jonathan S Weissman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-05-14       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Nucleosome loss activates CUP1 and HIS3 promoters to fully induced levels in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  L K Durrin; R K Mann; M Grunstein
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Genome-wide dynamics of Htz1, a histone H2A variant that poises repressed/basal promoters for activation through histone loss.

Authors:  Haiying Zhang; Douglas N Roberts; Bradley R Cairns
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2005-10-21       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Distinct modes of regulation by chromatin encoded through nucleosome positioning signals.

Authors:  Yair Field; Noam Kaplan; Yvonne Fondufe-Mittendorf; Irene K Moore; Eilon Sharon; Yaniv Lubling; Jonathan Widom; Eran Segal
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  An improved map of conserved regulatory sites for Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Kenzie D MacIsaac; Ting Wang; D Benjamin Gordon; David K Gifford; Gary D Stormo; Ernest Fraenkel
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  32 in total

Review 1.  Transcription goes digital.

Authors:  Timothée Lionnet; Robert H Singer
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  Gene promoters dictate histone occupancy within genes.

Authors:  Roberto Perales; Benjamin Erickson; Lian Zhang; Hyunmin Kim; Elan Valiquett; David Bentley
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Regulatory cis-elements are located in accessible promoter regions of the CAT2 promoter and affect activating histone modifications in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Miriam Laxa
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 4.076

4.  Nucleosome organization affects the sensitivity of gene expression to promoter mutations.

Authors:  Gil Hornung; Moshe Oren; Naama Barkai
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  Antisense non-coding transcription represses the PHO5 model gene at the level of promoter chromatin structure.

Authors:  Ana Novačić; Dario Menéndez; Jurica Ljubas; Slobodan Barbarić; Françoise Stutz; Julien Soudet; Igor Stuparević
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 6.020

6.  Ubiquitous heterogeneity and asymmetry of the chromatin environment at regulatory elements.

Authors:  Anshul Kundaje; Sofia Kyriazopoulou-Panagiotopoulou; Max Libbrecht; Cheryl L Smith; Debasish Raha; Elliott E Winters; Steven M Johnson; Michael Snyder; Serafim Batzoglou; Arend Sidow
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Uncovering the interplay between DNA sequence preferences of transcription factors and nucleosomes.

Authors:  Sarah A Teichmann; Philip A Wigge; Varodom Charoensawan
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 8.  Interplay between gene expression noise and regulatory network architecture.

Authors:  Guilhem Chalancon; Charles N J Ravarani; S Balaji; Alfonso Martinez-Arias; L Aravind; Raja Jothi; M Madan Babu
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 11.639

9.  DNA sequence preferences of transcriptional activators correlate more strongly than repressors with nucleosomes.

Authors:  Varodom Charoensawan; Sarath Chandra Janga; Martha L Bulyk; M Madan Babu; Sarah A Teichmann
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 17.970

10.  Evolution of cis-regulatory elements in yeast de novo and duplicated new genes.

Authors:  Zing Tsung-Yeh Tsai; Huai-Kuang Tsai; Jen-Hao Cheng; Chih-Hsu Lin; Yuan-Fan Tsai; Daryi Wang
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.