BACKGROUND: Endovascular stent-grafting is an established option for the repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) that can involve prolonged manipulation under radiological control. The aim was to determine the average radiation exposure sustained during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and the first year of postoperative surveillance. METHODS: Prospective radiation dose data were recorded and used to calculate dose area product (DAP) values for 96 patients undergoing EVAR. The DAP data were then used to determine the entrance skin dose (ESD), an indicator of potential skin damage, and the effective dose, an indicator of long-term cancer risk, for each patient. RESULTS: The median ESD during EVAR was 0.85 (interquartile range 0.51-3.74) Gy. The threshold for possible radiation-induced skin damage of 2 Gy was exceeded in 29 per cent of procedures. The effective dose of radiation in the first year following EVAR was 79 mSv. CONCLUSION: Radiation doses administered during EVAR were higher than previously thought, with a potential risk of radiation-induced skin damage and later malignancy. 2008 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
BACKGROUND: Endovascular stent-grafting is an established option for the repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) that can involve prolonged manipulation under radiological control. The aim was to determine the average radiation exposure sustained during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and the first year of postoperative surveillance. METHODS: Prospective radiation dose data were recorded and used to calculate dose area product (DAP) values for 96 patients undergoing EVAR. The DAP data were then used to determine the entrance skin dose (ESD), an indicator of potential skin damage, and the effective dose, an indicator of long-term cancer risk, for each patient. RESULTS: The median ESD during EVAR was 0.85 (interquartile range 0.51-3.74) Gy. The threshold for possible radiation-induced skin damage of 2 Gy was exceeded in 29 per cent of procedures. The effective dose of radiation in the first year following EVAR was 79 mSv. CONCLUSION: Radiation doses administered during EVAR were higher than previously thought, with a potential risk of radiation-induced skin damage and later malignancy. 2008 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Authors: D Kuhelj; U Zdesar; V Jevtic; D Skrk; G Omahen; D Zontar; M Surlan; M Glusic; P Popovic; I J Kocijancic; V Salapura Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Rui Machado; Vitor Miguel Dias Ferreira; Luis Loureiro; João Gonçalves; Pedro Oliveira; Rui Almeida Journal: Braz J Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2016 Nov-Dec
Authors: Monika Foerth; Michael C Seidenbusch; Mojtaba Sadeghi-Azandaryani; Ursula Lechel; Karla Maria Treitl; Marcus Treitl Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-04-09 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: E Tuthill; L O'Hora; M O'Donohoe; S Panci; P Gilligan; D Campion; R Trenti; E Fox; D Catania; L Rainford Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2017-05-18 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Maria Antonella Ruffino; Marco Fronda; Andrea Discalzi; Paola Isoardi; Laura Bergamasco; Roberto Ropolo; Dorico Righi; Paolo Fonio Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2018-07-23 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: M Russ; R O'Hara; S V Setlur Nagesh; M Mokin; C Jimenez; A Siddiqui; D Bednarek; S Rudin; C Ionita Journal: Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng Date: 2015-03-19