Literature DB >> 24336294

Objective evaluation of refractive data and astigmatism: quantification and analysis.

S B Kaye1.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to present methods to improve the analysis of refractive data. A comparison of methods is used to analyse refractive powers using individual powers and aggregate data. Equations are also developed for the representation of the average power of a lens or refractive data as a univariate measure, which includes spherical, coma, and/or other aberrations. The equations provide a precise representation of refractive power, which is useful for comparing individual and aggregate data. Average lens power in the principal meridian can be adequately computed as can the average lens power through orthogonal and oblique meridians, providing a good univariate representation of astigmatism and refractive power. Although these formulae are perhaps not as easy to use as, for example, the spherical equivalent, they are more precise and superior in principle involving fewer approximations and are not subject to systematic bias. These effects are of significance when dealing with high-powered lenses such as intraocular lenses or the cornea. They need to be taken into account particularly for calculations of intraocular lens power, toric intraocular lenses, and cornea refractive surgery, especially if outcomes are to be improved. Such issues are of particular importance when dealing with aggregate data and determining statistical significance of treatment effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24336294      PMCID: PMC3930272          DOI: 10.1038/eye.2013.266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  19 in total

Review 1.  A unified paraxial approach to astigmatic optics.

Authors:  W F Harris
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  Analyzing refractive changes after anterior segment surgery.

Authors:  S B Kaye; A Patterson
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.351

3.  Power vectors versus power matrices, and the mathematical nature of dioptric power.

Authors:  William F Harris
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Approximating lens power.

Authors:  Stephen B Kaye
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Custom optimization of intraocular lens asphericity.

Authors:  Douglas D Koch; Li Wang
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2007

Review 6.  Power vectors: an application of Fourier analysis to the description and statistical analysis of refractive error.

Authors:  L N Thibos; W Wheeler; D Horner
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 7.  Invariance of ophthalmic properties under spherocylindrical transposition.

Authors:  W F Harris
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  Comprehensive method of analyzing the results of photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy for the treatment of post-cataract myopic anisometropia.

Authors:  A Patterson; S B Kaye; N P O'Donnell
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.351

9.  Visual performance of aspherical and spherical intraocular lenses: intraindividual comparison of visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and higher-order aberrations.

Authors:  Thomas Kasper; Jens Bühren; Thomas Kohnen
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.351

10.  A method for assessing the accuracy of surgical technique in the correction of astigmatism.

Authors:  S B Kaye; S H Campbell; K Davey; A Patterson
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.638

View more
  7 in total

1.  [Comparison of two optical biometric devices for intraocular lens calculation].

Authors:  M-S Uckmann; M Stattin; C Zehetner; S Neururer; L Speicher
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Refractive outcomes following cataract surgery in patients who have had myopic laser vision correction.

Authors:  Chung Shen Chean; Boon Kang Aw Yong; Samuel Comely; Deena Maleedy; Stephen Kaye; Mark Batterbury; Vito Romano; Esmaeil Arbabi; Victor Hu
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-04-09

3.  Effect of Trabeculectomy on Mean and Centroid Surgically Induced Astigmatism.

Authors:  Wakako Ando; Kazutaka Kamiya; Masayuki Kasahara; Nobuyuki Shoji
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Transepithelial Iontophoresis-Assisted Cross Linking for Progressive Keratoconus: Up to 7 Years of Follow Up.

Authors:  Riccardo Vinciguerra; Emanuela F Legrottaglie; Costanza Tredici; Cosimo Mazzotta; Pietro Rosetta; Paolo Vinciguerra
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 5.  Dioptric power and refractive behaviour: a review of methods and applications.

Authors:  Alan Rubin; Tanya Evans; Nabeela Hasrod
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04-01

6.  Standardised approach to the reporting and presentation of refractive data: electronic patient record.

Authors:  Stephen B Kaye; Alan Rubin; Tanya Evans; Petros Aristodemou; Anthony Khawaja; John Sparrow
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04-01

7.  Prediction of myopia onset with refractive error measured using non-cycloplegic subjective refraction: the WEPrOM Study.

Authors:  Yee Ling Wong; Yimin Yuan; Binbin Su; Shezad Tufail; Yang Ding; Yingying Ye; Damien Paille; Björn Drobe; Hao Chen; Jinhua Bao
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-06-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.