Literature DB >> 18426436

The prognostic value of T wave amplitude in lead aVR in males.

Swee Y Tan1, Gregory Engel, Jonathan Myers, Marcus Sandri, Victor F Froelicher.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since there is an uncertainty regarding which of the 12 leads provides the most information, we investigated the association between repolarization phenomenon in all of the 12 leads and cardiovascular (CV) mortality.
METHODS: Retrospective cohort study was performed at Palo Alto Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Palo Alto, California, which included 24,270 consecutive male veterans with ECGs obtained for clinical reasons from 1987 to 2000. Analysis of computerized 12-lead resting ECGs was performed of all subjects excluding inpatients, patients with atrial fibrillation, WPW, QRS duration > 120 ms, and paced rhythms. Average follow-up was 7.5 years during which time there were 1859 CV deaths.
RESULTS: While ST segment measurements in aVR were univariately predictive of CV death, T wave amplitude superseded them in multivariate survival analysis. In addition, T wave amplitude in aVR outperformed repolarization measurements in all other leads as well as other ECG criteria (Q waves, damage scores, LVH) for predicting CV mortality. As T wave amplitude became less negative in aVR, there was a progressive increase in relative risk (RR). When the T waves in aVR had a positive deflection (i.e., upward pointing) the RR for CV death was 5.0.
CONCLUSIONS: T wave amplitude in lead aVR is a powerful prognostic marker for estimating risk of CV death. Upward pointing T waves (a simple visual criterion) was prevalent (7.3% of a clinical population) and was associated with an annual CV mortality of 3.4% and a risk of five times.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18426436      PMCID: PMC6932252          DOI: 10.1111/j.1542-474X.2008.00210.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol        ISSN: 1082-720X            Impact factor:   1.468


  20 in total

Review 1.  The prevalence and prognostic significance of electrocardiographic abnormalities.

Authors:  E A Ashley; V K Raxwal; V F Froelicher
Journal:  Curr Probl Cardiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.200

2.  Electrocardiographic changes in submassive pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  S R Mittal; Monika Maheshwari
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb

3.  Predictors of left main or three-vessel disease in patients who have acute coronary syndromes with non-ST-segment elevation.

Authors:  Masami Kosuge; Kazuo Kimura; Toshiyuki Ishikawa; Toshiaki Ebina; Tomoaki Shimizu; Kiyoshi Hibi; Noritaka Toda; Yoshio Tahara; Kengo Tsukahara; Masahiko Kanna; Jyunn Okuda; Naoki Nozawa; Hiroyuki Ozaki; Hideto Yano; Satoshi Umemura
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Prognostic importance of isolated T-wave abnormalities.

Authors:  Takuya Yamazaki; Jonathan Myers; Victor F Froelicher
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  The standard 11-lead ECG. Neglect of lead aVR in the classical limb lead display.

Authors:  U S Pahlm; O Pahlm; G S Wagner
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.438

6.  Clinical significance of abnormal T waves in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  M D Jacobsen; G S Wagner; L Holmvang; P W Macfarlane; U Näslund; P Grande; P Clemmensen
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Prediction of acute left main coronary artery obstruction by 12-lead electrocardiography. ST segment elevation in lead aVR with less ST segment elevation in lead V(1).

Authors:  H Yamaji; K Iwasaki; S Kusachi; T Murakami; R Hirami; H Hamamoto; K Hina; T Kita; N Sakakibara; T Tsuji
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction--summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina).

Authors:  Eugene Braunwald; Elliott M Antman; John W Beasley; Robert M Califf; Melvin D Cheitlin; Judith S Hochman; Robert H Jones; Dean Kereiakes; Joel Kupersmith; Thomas N Levin; Carl J Pepine; John W Schaeffer; Earl E Smith; David E Steward; Pierre Theroux; Raymond J Gibbons; Joseph S Alpert; David P Faxon; Valentin Fuster; Gabriel Gregoratos; Loren F Hiratzka; Alice K Jacobs; Sidney C Smith
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-10-02       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Factors predicting mortality in patients after myocardial infarction caused by left main coronary artery occlusion: significance of ST segment elevation in both aVR and aVL leads.

Authors:  T Hori; T Kurosawa; M Yoshida; M Yamazoe; Y Aizawa; T Izumi
Journal:  Jpn Heart J       Date:  2000-09

10.  Prognostic value of lead aVR in patients with a first non-ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  José A Barrabés; Jaume Figueras; Cristina Moure; Josefa Cortadellas; Jordi Soler-Soler
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-07-28       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  29 in total

1.  Upright T waves in lead aVR are associated with cardiac death or hospitalization for heart failure in patients with a prior myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Kumie Torigoe; Akira Tamura; Yoshiyuki Kawano; Kazuhiro Shinozaki; Munenori Kotoku; Junichi Kadota
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Recommendation for revision of the standard presentation of the frontal plane ECG leads including reversal of lead aVR (to -aVR): It is time for a change.

Authors:  Robert B Case; Arthur J Moss
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  T wave positivity in lead aVR is associated with mortality in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Yahya Kemal İçen; Yurdaer Dönmez; Hasan Koca; Mehmet Uğurlu; Mevlüt Koç
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-04-08       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 4.  Significance of lead aVR in acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Akira Tamura
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2014-07-26

5.  The year of 2008 in electrocardiology.

Authors:  Shlomo Stern
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.468

6.  Prognostic significance of T-wave amplitude in lead aVR in heart failure patients with narrow QRS complexes.

Authors:  Kentarou Okuda; Eiichi Watanabe; Kan Sano; Tomoharu Arakawa; Mayumi Yamamoto; Yoshihiro Sobue; Tatsushi Uchiyama; Yukio Ozaki
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.468

7.  Impact of T wave amplitude in lead aVR on predicting cardiac events in ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Tanaka; Tetsuo Konno; Yudai Tamura; Toyonobu Tsuda; Hiroshi Furusho; Masayuki Takamura; Kenji Sakata; Masakazu Yamagishi; Kenshi Hayashi
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 8.  Clinical utility of aVR-The neglected electrocardiographic lead.

Authors:  Dmitriy Kireyev; Mikhail V Arkhipov; Stephen T Zador; Joseph A Paris; William E Boden
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.468

9.  Electrocardiographic QT interval and mortality: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yiyi Zhang; Wendy S Post; Elena Blasco-Colmenares; Darshan Dalal; Gordon F Tomaselli; Eliseo Guallar
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.822

10.  T wave amplitude in lead aVR as a novel diagnostic marker for cardiac sarcoidosis.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Tanaka; Tetsuo Konno; Shohei Yoshida; Toyonobu Tsuda; Kenji Sakata; Hiroshi Furusho; Masayuki Takamura; Kenichi Yoshimura; Masakazu Yamagishi; Kenshi Hayashi
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 2.037

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.