Literature DB >> 9238411

The standard 11-lead ECG. Neglect of lead aVR in the classical limb lead display.

U S Pahlm1, O Pahlm, G S Wagner.   

Abstract

This study investigates how the format of limb lead display influences electrocardiographic (ECG) interpretation. The positive aspect of lead aVR (included in the classical display) is directed opposite to that of the other leads. This could lead to an ECG interpreter's disregard of lead aVR, thus providing a "standard 11-lead ECG." It is hypothesized that when using the classical limb lead display, ECG interpreters often ignore lead aVR, even when considering complex ECGs. Thirty-five of the participants attending this International Society of Computerized Electrocardiology meeting were asked to interpret five complex ECGs, displayed in the classical format. Lead aVR had been replaced by lead -aVR on all of these recordings. Second, the participants were asked if they (1) used all 12 leads, (2) used lead aVR, and (3) noticed that lead aVR had been changed. The results indicate that a vast majority of interpreters (80-94%) did not detect when lead aVR had been reversed. This suggests that interpreters only use 11 of the standard leads when presented with the classical display method to evaluate clinical problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9238411     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-0736(96)80074-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electrocardiol        ISSN: 0022-0736            Impact factor:   1.438


  13 in total

1.  aVR - the forgotten lead.

Authors:  Anil George; Pradeep S Arumugham; Vincent M Figueredo
Journal:  Exp Clin Cardiol       Date:  2010

2.  Recommendation for revision of the standard presentation of the frontal plane ECG leads including reversal of lead aVR (to -aVR): It is time for a change.

Authors:  Robert B Case; Arthur J Moss
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  The prognostic value of T wave amplitude in lead aVR in males.

Authors:  Swee Y Tan; Gregory Engel; Jonathan Myers; Marcus Sandri; Victor F Froelicher
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 4.  Utility of lead aVR for identifying the culprit lesion in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Jørgen Tobias Kühl; Ronan M G Berg
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.468

5.  Lead aVR: beyond 'No man's land'.

Authors:  Bhupinder Singh; Amjad Ali; Vivek Singla; Sadananda K Gowda
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-04-25

6.  Exercise test predictors of severe coronary artery disease: Role of ST-segment elevation in lead aVR.

Authors:  Giulio Russo; Salvatore Emanuele Ravenna; Antonio De Vita; Cristina Aurigemma; Priscilla Lamendola; Gaetano Antonio Lanza; Filippo Crea
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 7.  Clinical utility of aVR-The neglected electrocardiographic lead.

Authors:  Dmitriy Kireyev; Mikhail V Arkhipov; Stephen T Zador; Joseph A Paris; William E Boden
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.468

8.  Improving the ECG classification of inferior and lateral myocardial infarction by inversion of lead aVR.

Authors:  I B Menown; A A Adgey
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Relationship between ST-Segment Shifts in Lead aVR and Coronary Complexity in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Authors:  Adem Adar; Orhan Onalan; Fahri Cakan
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.672

10.  ST segment change and T wave amplitude ratio in lead aVR associated with coronary artery disease severity in patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Yahya Kemal İçen; Mevlüt Koç
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.