Literature DB >> 29379224

Implicit learning of structure occurs in parallel with lexically-mediated syntactic priming effects in sentence comprehension.

Kristen M Tooley1, Matthew J Traxler2.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine whether cumulative structural priming effects and trial-to-trial lexically-mediated priming effects are produced by the same mechanism in comprehension. Participants took part in a five-session eye tracking study where they read reduced-relative prime-target pairs with the same initial verb. Half of the verbs in these sentences were repeated across the five sessions and half were novel to each session. Total fixation times on the syntactically challenging parts of prime sentences decreased across sessions, suggesting participants implicitly learned the structure. Additional priming was also observed at the critical regions of the target sentences, and the magnitude of this effect did not change over the five sessions. These finding suggests long-lived adaptation to structure and short-lived lexically-mediated priming effects are caused by separate mechanisms in comprehension. A dual mechanism account of syntactic priming effects can best reconcile these results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Syntactic priming; comprehension; learning; lexical boost

Year:  2017        PMID: 29379224      PMCID: PMC5786270          DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2017.09.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mem Lang        ISSN: 0749-596X            Impact factor:   3.059


  44 in total

1.  Syntactic priming: a corpus-based approach.

Authors:  Stefan Th Gries
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2005-07

2.  Priming prepositional-phrase attachment during comprehension.

Authors:  Holly P Branigan; Martin J Pickering; Janet F McLean
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Priming ditransitive structures in comprehension.

Authors:  Manabu Arai; Roger P G van Gompel; Christoph Scheepers
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence of syntactic priming in sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Kristen M Tooley; Matthew J Traxler; Tamara Y Swaab
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Individual differences in syntactic ambiguity resolution: readers vary in their use of plausibility information.

Authors:  Debra L Long; Chantel S Prat
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-03

Review 6.  Implicit learning.

Authors:  C A Seger
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Building syntactic structures in speaking: a bilingual exploration.

Authors:  Paul J Meijer; Jean E Tree
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2003

8.  Patterns of experience with verbs affect long-term cumulative structural priming.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Coyle; Michael P Kaschak
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-10

9.  Experience and sentence processing: statistical learning and relative clause comprehension.

Authors:  Justine B Wells; Morten H Christiansen; David S Race; Daniel J Acheson; Maryellen C MacDonald
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Give and take: syntactic priming during spoken language comprehension.

Authors:  Malathi Thothathiri; Jesse Snedeker
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2008-02-06
View more
  2 in total

1.  Structural Priming and Inverse Preference Effects in L2 Grammaticality Judgment and Production of English Relative Clauses.

Authors:  Ran Wei; Sun-A Kim; Jeong-Ah Shin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-22

2.  Agreement With Conjoined NPs Reflects Language Experience.

Authors:  Heidi Lorimor; Nora C Adams; Erica L Middleton
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-04-19
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.