Literature DB >> 11713877

Comprehension skill and global coherence: a paradoxical picture of poor comprehenders' abilities.

D L Long1, J L Chong.   

Abstract

The authors investigated good and poor comprehenders' maintenance of global coherence during reading. Participants read stories in which a character's action was consistent or inconsistent with a description of the character presented earlier in the story. In Experiment 1, the description and action were adjacent in the text (local coherence) or were separated by intervening text (global coherence). Both groups of comprehenders read inconsistent actions more slowly than consistent actions in the local coherence condition, but only good comprehenders showed the reading time difference in the global coherence condition. In Experiment 2, the authors disconfirmed the hypothesis that poor comprehenders fail to maintain global coherence because they fail to activate prior text information. Thus, the results present a paradoxical picture in which poor readers activate relevant knowledge during reading but fail to integrate it into their developing representation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11713877     DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.27.6.1424

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  14 in total

1.  The interplay of discourse congruence and lexical association during sentence processing: Evidence from ERPs and eye tracking.

Authors:  C Christine Camblin; Peter C Gordon; Tamara Y Swaab
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.059

2.  Brain networks subserving the extraction of sentence information and its encoding to memory.

Authors:  Uri Hasson; Howard C Nusbaum; Steven L Small
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-03-19       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Individual differences in syntactic ambiguity resolution: readers vary in their use of plausibility information.

Authors:  Debra L Long; Chantel S Prat
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-03

4.  Motivated comprehension regulation: vigilant versus eager metacognitive control.

Authors:  David B Miele; Daniel C Molden; Wendi L Gardner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-09

5.  Validating presupposed versus focused text information.

Authors:  Murray Singer; Kevin G Solar; Jackie Spear
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-04

6.  Prenatal Cocaine Exposure Impacts Language and Reading Into Late Adolescence: Behavioral and ERP Evidence.

Authors:  Nicole Landi; Trey Avery; Michael J Crowley; Jia Wu; Linda Mayes
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 2.253

7.  Inferential Processing among Adequate and Struggling Adolescent Comprehenders and Relations to Reading Comprehension.

Authors:  Amy E Barth; Marcia Barnes; David J Francis; Sharon Vaughn; Mary York
Journal:  Read Writ       Date:  2015-05-01

8.  Cognitive control influences the use of meaning relations during spoken sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Megan A Boudewyn; Debra L Long; Tamara Y Swaab
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 9.  A context-dependent representation model for explaining text repetition effects.

Authors:  Gary E Raney
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-03

10.  The Effects of Suprasegmental Phonological Training on English Reading Comprehension: Evidence from Chinese EFL Learners.

Authors:  Gang Cui; Yuemin Wang; Xiaoyun Zhong
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2020-11-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.