Literature DB >> 18421537

FDG-PET imaging can diagnose periprosthetic infection of the hip.

Timothy Chryssikos1, Javad Parvizi, Elie Ghanem, Andrew Newberg, Hongming Zhuang, Abass Alavi.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: A battery of diagnostic tests is often required to differentiate aseptic loosening from periprosthetic infection since the gold standard remains elusive. We designed a prospective study to determine the accuracy of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) imaging in diagnosing periprosthetic infection in a large multicenter setting. One hundred and thirteen patients with 127 painful hip prostheses were evaluated by FDG-PET. Images were considered positive for infection if PET demonstrated increased FDG activity at the bone-prosthesis interface of the femoral component. A combination of preoperative tests, intraoperative findings, histopathology, and clinical followup constituted the gold standard for diagnosing infection. Among the 35 positive PET scans, 28 hips were confirmed infected according to our criteria for diagnosing periprosthetic infection. Of the 92 hip prostheses with negative FDG-PET findings, 87 were considered aseptic. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for FDG-PET were 0.85 (28 of 33), 0.93 (87 of 94), 0.80 (28 of 35), and 0.95 (87 of 92), respectively. The overall accuracy of this novel noninvasive imaging modality reached 0.91 (115 of 127). Based on our results, FDG-PET appears a promising and accurate diagnostic tool for distinguishing septic from aseptic painful hip prostheses. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, diagnostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18421537      PMCID: PMC2384031          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0237-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  20 in total

1.  Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030.

Authors:  Steven Kurtz; Kevin Ong; Edmund Lau; Fionna Mowat; Michael Halpern
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Total-hip arthroplasty: periprosthetic indium-111-labeled leukocyte activity and complementary technetium-99m-sulfur colloid imaging in suspected infection.

Authors:  C J Palestro; C K Kim; A J Swyer; J D Capozzi; R W Solomon; S J Goldsmith
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-position emission tomography: a highly accurate imaging modality for the diagnosis of chronic musculoskeletal infections.

Authors:  F de Winter; C van de Wiele; D Vogelaers; K de Smet; R Verdonk; R A Dierckx
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  The Coventry Award. The value of preoperative aspiration before total knee revision.

Authors:  R L Barrack; R W Jennings; M W Wolfe; A J Bertot
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  [The value of leukocyte scintigraphy in suspected implant infection in patients with chronic polyarthritis].

Authors:  D Lazovic; J Carls; A Flöel; K F Gratz
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  The infected hip after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  G C Canner; M E Steinberg; R B Heppenstall; R Balderston
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Evaluation of the painful prosthetic joint. Relative value of bone scan, sedimentation rate, and joint aspiration.

Authors:  K A Levitsky; W J Hozack; R A Balderston; R H Rothman; S J Gluckman; M M Maslack; R E Booth
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  The role of intraoperative frozen sections in revision total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  D S Feldman; J H Lonner; P Desai; J D Zuckerman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  The diagnostic value of C-reactive protein in infected total hip arthroplasties.

Authors:  L Sanzén; A S Carlsson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1989-08

10.  FDG PET for differentiation of infection and aseptic loosening in total hip replacements: comparison with conventional radiography and three-phase bone scintigraphy.

Authors:  Katrin D M Stumpe; Hubert P Nötzli; Marco Zanetti; Ehab M Kamel; Thomas F Hany; Gerhard W Görres; Gustav K von Schulthess; Juerg Hodler
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-03-24       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  18 in total

1.  [F-18]2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography after limb salvage surgery: post-surgical appearance, attenuation correction and local complications.

Authors:  Michael J Gelfand; Susan E Sharp
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-02-27

Review 2.  FDG-PET for diagnosing prosthetic joint infection: systematic review and metaanalysis.

Authors:  Thomas C Kwee; Robert M Kwee; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Should well-fixed uncemented femoral components be revised in infected hip arthroplasty? Report of five trial cases.

Authors:  Kiyokazu Fukui; Ayumi Kaneuji; Syusuke Ueda; Tadami Matsumoto
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2015-11-01

4.  FDG PET imaging for diagnosing prosthetic joint infection: discussing the facts, rectifying the unsupported claims and call for evidence-based and scientific approach.

Authors:  Thomas C Kwee; Sandip Basu; Drew A Torigian; Hongming Zhuang; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  18F FDG-PET/CT has poor diagnostic accuracy in diagnosing shoulder PJI.

Authors:  Thomas Falstie-Jensen; J Lange; H Daugaard; M H Vendelbo; A K Sørensen; B Zerahn; J Ovesen; K Søballe; L C Gormsen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  Applications of PET-Computed Tomography-Magnetic Resonance in the Management of Benign Musculoskeletal Disorders.

Authors:  James S Yoder; Feliks Kogan; Garry E Gold
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2019-01

7.  The role of synovial fluid analysis in the detection of periprosthetic hip and knee infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marcello De Fine; Gianluca Giavaresi; Milena Fini; Andrea Illuminati; Silvio Terrando; Giovanni Pignatti
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  [Diagnosis of periprosthetic hip infections].

Authors:  C M Lüdemann; N Schütze; M Rudert
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 1.154

9.  Preclinical Evaluation of Photoacoustic Imaging as a Novel Noninvasive Approach to Detect an Orthopaedic Implant Infection.

Authors:  Yu Wang; John M Thompson; Alyssa G Ashbaugh; Pavlo Khodakivskyi; Ghyslain Budin; Riccardo Sinisi; Andrew Heinmiller; Marleen van Oosten; Jan Maarten van Dijl; Gooitzen M van Dam; Kevin P Francis; Nicholas M Bernthal; Elena A Dubikovskaya; Lloyd S Miller
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.020

10.  Increased 18F-FDG uptake suggests synovial inflammatory reaction with osteoarthritis: preliminary in-vivo results in humans.

Authors:  Molly A Parsons; Mateen Moghbel; Babak Saboury; Drew A Torigian; Thomas J Werner; Domenico Rubello; Sandip Basu; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.690

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.