Literature DB >> 27857477

Should well-fixed uncemented femoral components be revised in infected hip arthroplasty? Report of five trial cases.

Kiyokazu Fukui1, Ayumi Kaneuji1, Syusuke Ueda1, Tadami Matsumoto1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Well-fixed femoral component removal remains difficult and complicated.
METHODS: We report herein the outcomes of two-stage surgery involving retention of bone-ingrown uncemented stems, aggressive soft-tissue debridement, and delayed reimplantation of an acetabular component in 5 patients for infected hip arthroplasty.
RESULTS: By a mean follow-up point of 4.2 years after the second-stage operation, none of the 5 patients experienced recurrence of infection, and the mean Harris hip score had improved from 63 to 86 points by the latest follow-up evaluation.
CONCLUSION: Two-stage revision with retention of well-fixed uncemented stems could be an alternative treatment option in hip periprosthetic infection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FDG-PET; Fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography; Infected hip arthroplasty; Two-stage revision; Uncemented femoral component retention

Year:  2015        PMID: 27857477      PMCID: PMC5103038          DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2015.09.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop        ISSN: 0972-978X


  27 in total

1.  Removal of the well-fixed hip resurfacing acetabular component: a simple, bone preserving technique.

Authors:  Paul R P Taylor; K K Stoffel; D G Dunlop; P J Yates
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Comparison of one-stage revision with antibiotic cement versus two-stage revision results for infected total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ho-Rim Choi; Young-Min Kwon; Andrew A Freiberg; Henrik Malchau
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  FDG-PET imaging can diagnose periprosthetic infection of the hip.

Authors:  Timothy Chryssikos; Javad Parvizi; Elie Ghanem; Andrew Newberg; Hongming Zhuang; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Prosthetic joint infection following total hip replacement: results of one-stage versus two-stage exchange.

Authors:  Matthias Wolf; Heimo Clar; Jörg Friesenbichler; Gerold Schwantzer; Gerwin Bernhardt; Gerald Gruber; Mathias Glehr; Andreas Leithner; Patrick Sadoghi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  One-stage exchange arthroplasty for chronic periprosthetic hip infection: results of a large prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Valérie Zeller; Luc Lhotellier; Simon Marmor; Philippe Leclerc; Alysa Krain; Wilfrid Graff; Françoise Ducroquet; David Biau; Philippe Leonard; Nicole Desplaces; Patrick Mamoudy
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  A two-stage retention débridement protocol for acute periprosthetic joint infections.

Authors:  Chris S Estes; Chris P Beauchamp; Henry D Clarke; Mark J Spangehl
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Treatment of deep infection of the hip associated with massive bone loss: two-stage revision with an antibiotic-loaded interim cement prosthesis followed by reconstruction with allograft.

Authors:  P-H Hsieh; C-H Shih; Y-H Chang; M S Lee; W-E Yang; H-N Shih
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-06

8.  Outcomes of revision total hip replacement for infection after grading according to a standard protocol.

Authors:  S I S Oussedik; M B Dodd; F S Haddad
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2010-09

9.  Impregnation of vancomycin, gentamicin, and cefotaxime in a cement spacer for two-stage cementless reconstruction in infected total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  K H Koo; J W Yang; S H Cho; H R Song; H B Park; Y C Ha; J D Chang; S Y Kim; Y H Kim
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Retaining well-fixed cementless stem in the treatment of infected hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Young-Kyun Lee; Kee Haeng Lee; Jae-Hwi Nho; Yong-Chan Ha; Kyung-Hoi Koo
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2013-04-28       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  5 in total

1.  Partial component-retained two-stage reconstruction for chronic infection after uncemented total hip arthroplasty: good or bad?

Authors:  Zuyun Yan; Rui Fang; Tang Liu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Partial component-retained two-stage reconstruction for chronic infection after uncemented total hip arthroplasty: results of sixteen cases after five years of follow-up.

Authors:  Kun-Hui Chen; Shang-Wen Tsai; Po-Kuei Wu; Cheng-Fong Chen; Hsin-Yi Wang; Wei-Ming Chen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-05-27       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Hip and Knee Section, Treatment, Surgical Technique: Proceedings of International Consensus on Orthopedic Infections.

Authors:  Moneer M Abouljoud; David Backstein; Andrew Battenberg; Matthew Dietz; Alejo Erice; Andrew A Freiberg; Jeffrey Granger; Adam Katchky; Anton Khlopas; Tae-Kyun Kim; Per Kjaersgaard-Andersen; Kyung-Hoi Koo; Yona Kosashvili; Percia Lazarovski; Jennifer Leighton; Adolph Lombardi; Konstantinos Malizos; Jorge Manrique; Michael A Mont; Marianthe Papanagiotoy; Rafael J Sierra; Nipun Sodhi; John Stammers; Maik Stiehler; Timothy L Tan; Katsufumi Uchiyama; Derek Ward; Anna Ziogkou
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Treatment of periprosthetic hip infection with retention of a well-fixed stem: six to 13-year outcomes.

Authors:  Takuya Otani; Hideki Fujii; Yasuhiko Kawaguchi; Tetsuo Hayama; Toshiomi Abe; Motoi Takahashi; Keishi Marumo
Journal:  Arthroplasty       Date:  2019-08-01

5.  A Decision Support Framework for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Treatment: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Using Two Modeling Approaches.

Authors:  Vasiliy N Leonenko; Yulia E Kaliberda; Yulia V Muravyova; Vasiliy A Artyukh
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-07-26
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.