Literature DB >> 25860787

[Diagnosis of periprosthetic hip infections].

C M Lüdemann1, N Schütze, M Rudert.   

Abstract

The diagnosis of periprosthetic infection requires a clear definition itself and structured procedure concerning anamnesis, clinical examination, laboratory findings, puncture and imaging diagnostics. The clinical presentation may vary considerable due to the time of their occurrence as early, delayed, or late infection. Recognition of risk factors and knowledge of differential diagnoses facilitate and confirm the diagnosis. The synovial fluid is assessed with regard to leukocyte count, protein content, and glucose. Intraoperative tissue specimen sampling has to be performed correctly; the histopathological and microbiological studies must be assessed using specific criteria. The examination and classification of periprosthetic membranes make discrimination of the causal pathological mechanism possible, especially distinction between septic and aseptic loosening. In this manner statements with regard to etiology and prosthesis durability are possible. Different causative microorganisms appear postoperatively at specific times. Pathogens that grow as biofilms are of great significance, as they may compound diagnosis and therapy. Early infections are often caused by virulent microorganisms (S. aureus) with acute onset. Delayed (low grade) infections are usually caused by less virulent microorganisms, such as S. epidermidis or coagulase-negative staphylococci. Many diagnostic imaging methods have been used in the assessment of periprosthetic infection: plain radiographs, arthrography, ultrasonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. Nuclear medicine with bone scintigraphy or positron-emission tomography enhance diagnostic capabilities. Cultures of samples obtained by sonication of prostheses are more sensitive than conventional periprosthetic tissue culture. Multiplex PCR of sonication fluid is a promising test for diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection. The promising diagnostic accuracy for interleukin-6 and procalcitonin has yet not been affirmed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25860787     DOI: 10.1007/s00064-015-0362-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol        ISSN: 0934-6694            Impact factor:   1.154


  37 in total

1.  Complications of total hip arthroplasty: MR imaging-initial experience.

Authors:  L M White; J K Kim; M Mehta; N Merchant; M E Schweitzer; W B Morrison; C R Hutchison; A E Gross
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  [Allergic reactions as differential diagnosis for periprosthetic infection].

Authors:  H Meyer; A Krüger; A Roessner; C H Lohmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  [Revision strategy for periprosthetic infection].

Authors:  B Lehner; D Witte; A J Suda; S Weiss
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  FDG-PET imaging can diagnose periprosthetic infection of the hip.

Authors:  Timothy Chryssikos; Javad Parvizi; Elie Ghanem; Andrew Newberg; Hongming Zhuang; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Diagnosis of periprosthetic infection.

Authors:  Thomas W Bauer; Javad Parvizi; Naomi Kobayashi; Viktor Krebs
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Mark B. Coventry Award: synovial C-reactive protein: a prospective evaluation of a molecular marker for periprosthetic knee joint infection.

Authors:  Javad Parvizi; Christina Jacovides; Bahar Adeli; Kwang Am Jung; William J Hozack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Improved diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection by multiplex PCR of sonication fluid from removed implants.

Authors:  Yvonne Achermann; Markus Vogt; Michael Leunig; Jürg Wüst; Andrej Trampuz
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Perioperative testing for joint infection in patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mark F Schinsky; Craig J Della Valle; Scott M Sporer; Wayne G Paprosky
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  The role of intraoperative frozen sections in revision total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  D S Feldman; J H Lonner; P Desai; J D Zuckerman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Sonication is superior to scraping for retrieval of bacteria in biofilm on titanium and steel surfaces in vitro.

Authors:  Geir Bjerkan; Eivind Witsø; Kåre Bergh
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  2 in total

1.  Evaluation of the use of sonication of retrieved implants for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection in a routine setting.

Authors:  Laura Prieto-Borja; Álvaro Auñón; Antonio Blanco; Ricardo Fernández-Roblas; Ignacio Gadea; Joaquín García-Cañete; Raúl Parrón; Jaime Esteban
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 2.  [Joint infections of the hand].

Authors:  F Unglaub; M F Langer; J M Unglaub; B Hohendorff; L P Müller; P Hahn; S Löw; C K Spies
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.000

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.