Literature DB >> 6389554

The infected hip after total hip arthroplasty.

G C Canner, M E Steinberg, R B Heppenstall, R Balderston.   

Abstract

We studied the cases of fifty-two patients with an infection at the site of a prosthetic total hip replacement, and are reporting the significant clinical features, infecting organisms, methods of treatment, and results at long-term follow-up. Forty-eight per cent of the hips had had an operation prior to the index arthroplasty, and 42 per cent had a wound complication. All patients had pain in the infected hip, but only 54 per cent had an erythrocyte sedimentation rate of more than thirty millimeters per hour, 44 per cent had fever, and 15 per cent had leukocytosis. In 88 per cent of the patients a single organism was grown on culture, and Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, and Escherichia coli were present in about 75 per cent. When antibiotic therapy alone was the initial treatment, the infection was eradicated in only one patient. Excisional arthroplasty was the definitive surgical procedure in thirty-three patients and the infection was eradicated in twenty-seven of them, but the clinical result was satisfactory in only twenty. Of ten patients who had a true Girdlestone arthroplasty, none had recurrence of the infection and all had a clinically satisfactory outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6389554

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  9 in total

1.  FDG-PET imaging can diagnose periprosthetic infection of the hip.

Authors:  Timothy Chryssikos; Javad Parvizi; Elie Ghanem; Andrew Newberg; Hongming Zhuang; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Two-Stage Revision Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Prosthetic Joint Infection.

Authors:  Ryan S Charette; Christopher M Melnic
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-09

3.  Resection arthroplasty: middle- and long-term results.

Authors:  T Herzog; W Link; S Engel; H Beck
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Aggressive early débridement for treatment of acutely infected cemented total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mohamed Sukeik; Shelain Patel; Fares Sami Haddad
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  [Risk factors for failed cleansing following periprosthetic delayed hip prosthesis infection].

Authors:  U Spiegl; R Pätzold; J Friederichs; M Militz; V Bühren
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Is there a role for tissue biopsy in the diagnosis of periprosthetic infection?

Authors:  Geert Meermans; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Two stage hip revision in periprosthetic infection: results of 41 cases.

Authors:  Giovanni Pignatti; Shingo Nitta; Nicola Rani; Dante Dallari; Giacomo Sabbioni; Cesare Stagni; Armando Giunti
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2010-06-11

8.  Metabolic Pattern of Asymptomatic Hip-Prosthesis by 18F-FDG-Positron-Emission-Tomography.

Authors:  Nermina Beslic; Daniel Heber; Rainer Walter Lipp; Charlotte Sonneck-Koenne; Peter Knoll; Siroos Mirzaei
Journal:  Iran J Radiol       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 0.212

9.  Staged Revision of Infected-hip Arthroplasty Using an Antibiotics-loaded Intra-articular Cement Spacer: Impact on Cemented and Cementless Stem Retention.

Authors:  Kyu-Sub Um; Joong-Won Lee; Byung-Ho Yoon; Yerl-Bo Sung
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2020-02-26
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.