Literature DB >> 20434229

Impact of organic-liquid distribution and flow-field heterogeneity on reductions in mass flux.

Erica L DiFilippo1, Kenneth C Carroll, Mark L Brusseau.   

Abstract

A series of flow-cell experiments was conducted to investigate the impact of organic-liquid distribution and flow-field heterogeneity on the relationship between source-zone mass removal and reductions in contaminant mass flux from the source zone. Changes in source-zone architecture were quantified using image analysis, allowing explicit examination of their impact on the mass-flux-reduction/mass-removal behavior. The results showed that there was minimal reduction in mass flux until a large fraction of mass was removed for systems wherein organic liquid was present solely as residual saturation in regions that were hydraulically accessible. Conversely, significant reductions in mass flux occurred with relatively minimal mass removal for systems wherein organic liquid was present at both residual and higher saturations. The latter systems exhibited multi-step mass-flux-reduction/mass-removal behavior, and characterization of the organic-liquid saturation distribution throughout flushing allowed identification of the cause of the nonideal behavior. The age of the source zone (e.g., extent of mass removal prior to characterization) significantly influenced the observed mass-flux-reduction/mass-removal behavior. The results of this study illustrate the impact of both organic-liquid distribution and flow-field heterogeneity on mass-removal and mass-flux processes. 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20434229      PMCID: PMC2884052          DOI: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2010.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Contam Hydrol        ISSN: 0169-7722            Impact factor:   3.188


  14 in total

1.  Remediating chlorinated solvent source zones.

Authors:  Hans F Stroo; Marvin Unger; C Herb Ward; Michael C Kavanaugh; Catherine Vogel; Andrea Leeson; Jeffrey Marqusee; Bradley P Smith
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2003-06-01       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 2.  A review of NAPL source zone remediation efficiency and the mass flux approach.

Authors:  K Soga; J W E Page; T H Illangasekare
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2004-07-05       Impact factor: 10.588

3.  Assessing the impacts of partial mass depletion in DNAPL source zones I. Analytical modeling of source strength functions and plume response.

Authors:  Ronald W Falta; P Suresh Rao; Nandita Basu
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.188

4.  Determination of NAPL-water interfacial areas in well-characterized porous media.

Authors:  Richard Dobson; Martin H Schroth; Mart Oostrom; Josef Zeyer
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Source-zone characterization of a chlorinated-solvent contaminated Superfund site in Tucson, AZ.

Authors:  M L Brusseau; N T Nelson; Z Zhang; J E Blue; J Rohrer; T Allen
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2006-10-16       Impact factor: 3.188

6.  Temporal evolution of DNAPL source and contaminant flux distribution: impacts of source mass depletion.

Authors:  Nandita B Basu; P S C Rao; Ronald W Falta; Michael D Annable; James W Jawitz; K Hatfield
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2007-08-30       Impact factor: 3.188

7.  Evaluation of simplified mass transfer models to simulate the impacts of source zone architecture on nonaqueous phase liquid dissolution in heterogeneous porous media.

Authors:  Changyong Zhang; Hongkyu Yoon; Charles J Werth; Albert J Valocchi; Nandita B Basu; James W Jawitz
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 3.188

8.  Dissolution of nonuniformly distributed immiscible liquid: intermediate-scale experiments and mathematical modeling.

Authors:  Mark L Brusseau; Zhihui Zhang; Nicole T Nelson; R Brent Cain; Geoffrey R Tick; Mart Oostrom
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Reductions in contaminant mass discharge following partial mass removal from DNAPL source zones.

Authors:  Eric J Suchomel; Kurt D Pennell
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-10-01       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Controlled release, blind test of DNAPL remediation by ethanol flushing.

Authors:  Michael C Brooks; Michael D Annable; P Suresh C Rao; Kirk Hatfield; James W Jawitz; William R Wise; A Lynn Wood; Carl G Enfield
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.188

View more
  11 in total

1.  Impact of enhanced-flushing reagents and organic-liquid distribution on mass removal and mass-discharge reduction.

Authors:  Nihat Hakan Akyol; Ann Russo Lee; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  Water Air Soil Pollut       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 2.520

2.  An empirical model for the evaluation of the dissolution rate from a DNAPL-contaminated area.

Authors:  Antonella Luciano; Giuseppe Mancini; Vincenzo Torretta; Paolo Viotti
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Use of Historical Pump-and-Treat Data to Enhance Site Characterization and Remediation Performance Assessment.

Authors:  Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  Water Air Soil Pollut       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.520

4.  The impact of well-field configuration and permeability heterogeneity on contaminant mass removal and plume persistence.

Authors:  Zhilin Guo; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 10.588

5.  Mathematical modeling of organic liquid dissolution in heterogeneous source zones.

Authors:  Zhilin Guo; Ann E Russo; Erica L DiFilippo; Zhihui Zhang; Chunmiao Zheng; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 3.188

6.  1,4-Dioxane cosolvency impacts on trichloroethene dissolution and sorption.

Authors:  Justin Milavec; Geoffrey R Tick; Mark L Brusseau; Kenneth C Carroll
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 8.071

7.  Assessment of a simple function to evaluate the relationship between mass flux reduction and mass removal for organic-liquid contaminated source zones.

Authors:  Erica L DiFilippo; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 3.188

8.  Persistence of a Groundwater Contaminant Plume after Hydraulic Source Containment at a Chlorinated-Solvent Contaminated Site.

Authors:  D E Matthieu; M L Brusseau; Z Guo; M Plaschke; K C Carroll; F Brinker
Journal:  Ground Water Monit Remediat       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.019

9.  The Impact of Well-Field Configuration on Contaminant Mass Removal and Plume Persistence for Homogeneous versus Layered Systems.

Authors:  Zhilin Guo; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  Hydrol Process       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 3.565

10.  Characterizing long-term contaminant mass discharge and the relationship between reductions in discharge and reductions in mass for DNAPL source areas.

Authors:  M L Brusseau; D E Matthieu; K C Carroll; J Mainhagu; C Morrison; A McMillan; A Russo; M Plaschke
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.188

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.